How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Cm Math Approximation
1 · Prerequisites
- Absolute and Conditional Convergence; Rearrangement; Products
- Algebraic Closure, Embeddings, and Separability
- Algebraic Extensions, Extension Degree, and Finite Fields
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Bounded Linear Operators and Quotient Spaces
- Cm Math Balances
- Cm Math Dynamics
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Complex Differentiability and the Cauchy–Riemann Equations
- Composition Series, the Jordan–Hölder Theorem and Solvable Groups
- Congruences, the Integers Modulo n and the Chinese Remainder Theorem
- Connectedness
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Cyclic Groups and Direct Products
- Determinants of Matrices over a Commutative Ring
- Diagonalisation and the Minimal Polynomial
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Divisibility, Greatest Common Divisors and Bézout's Identity
- Dual Spaces, Bilinear and Quadratic Forms, and Sylvester's Law of Inertia
- Eigenvalues, Eigenvectors and the Characteristic Polynomial
- Filters and Ultrafilters
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Finite Dimensional Normed Spaces and Riesz Lemma
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Fundamental Trigonometric Identities
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Group Homomorphisms and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Inner Product Spaces, Gram-Schmidt, Projections and Adjoints
- Limits of Real Functions
- limsup, liminf, and Subsequential Limits
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Matrices, the Matrix of a Linear Map, and Change of Basis
- Metric Spaces
- Mixed Partials, Taylor Formulae, and Extrema
- Monotone Functions, Discontinuities, and Continuity Sets
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Normed and Banach Spaces
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Partitions of Unity and Paracompactness
- Picard-Lindelöf and First-Order Ordinary Differential Equations
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Power Series and Real-Analytic Functions
- Primes, Euclid's Lemma and the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic
- Properties of the Integral and the Working FTC
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Rⁿ as a Normed Space; Vector-Valued Functions
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Separation Axioms: the Hierarchy
- Sequences and Limits
- Sequences and Series of Functions; Uniform Convergence
- Series: Convergence and the Nonnegative Tests
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Sine, Cosine, and the Definition of Pi
- Splitting Fields
- Strongly Continuous Semigroups and Hille Yosida
- Subspaces, Products, and Quotients
- Suprema and Infima
- Sylow's Theorems, p-Groups and Nilpotent Groups
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- The Cantor Set, Baire Category, and Measure Zero in ℝ
- The Complex Exponential and Euler's Formula
- The Derivative and the Mean Value Theorems
- The Determinant of a Linear Operator, Cofactors and Cramer's Rule
- The Exponential Function
- The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra
- The Fundamental Theorem of Finite Abelian Groups
- The Fundamental Theorems of Calculus
- The Galois Correspondence
- The Inverse and Implicit Function Theorems
- The Inverse Function Theorem Completed
- The Riemann Integral: Definition and Integrability
- The Spectral Theorem, Positive Operators and Singular Value Decomposition
- The Topology of Euclidean Space
- The Total Derivative in ℝᵐ → ℝⁿ
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topology of ℝ
- Triangularisation, Generalised Eigenspaces and Jordan Canonical Form
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
2 · Summary
The approximation layer of the non-relativistic classical mechanics
collection, all of it mathematics: the exact solution theory of the linear damped
driven oscillator, the convolution (Green's kernel) representation of forced
solutions, the steady sinusoidal response with its resonance and amplitude peak,
the finite-time linearization error bound, the averaging estimate on the
time scale, and the adiabatic action-drift bound. Every item
carries domain: mathematics and depends only on mathematical suppliers;
nothing here asserts that any model describes nature, and the physical reading
of masses, forces, damping, driving and slow parameter variation belongs to the
consuming classical-mechanics pages.
The exact oscillator layer begins with The damped driven oscillator model: second-order equation, phase-plane system and characteristic data, which fixes the second-order model , its phase-plane system and its characteristic data. The homogeneous damped oscillator: solution classification by the discriminant and uniqueness for initial data classifies all solutions for by the discriminant (distinct real roots, a double root, and the oscillatory family ) and proves uniqueness for prescribed initial data; The degenerate and repulsive oscillator: solutions for k=0 and the explicit growing solution for k<0 covers and , including the explicit exponentially growing solution when , and Strictly damped homogeneous oscillator with : every solution tends to zero records the exponential decay of all homogeneous solutions when , .
The forcing layer is Differentiation of a variable-limit convolution integral with a C-one matrix kernel, the exact differentiation rule for variable-limit convolution integrals, and The forced oscillator with : unique global solution and the convolution (Green's function) formula, which represents the unique solution of the forced model with as a homogeneous solution plus the convolution of the forcing with the kernel , . Variation of constants for via the matrix exponential supplies the corresponding matrix-exponential formula for general linear systems, used again in the linearization estimate. Sinusoidal forcing: the steady response, its amplitude and phase, and resonance at identifies the steady response for , the resonant solution when and , and the decay of the transient when ; The amplitude of the sinusoidally forced damped oscillator: location and value of its maximum locates the maximum of the response amplitude at when this is positive and at otherwise. Forced quadratic system : decoupled forced modes and the convolution solution decouples the forced quadratic system into the scalar forced modes of the quadratic-mode theorem and writes their solutions by the same kernel.
The approximation layer proper comprises Finite-time linearization error bound: quadratic remainder, exponential growth bound and the variation-of-constants estimate (existence on under and the estimate ), Elementary bounds for the periodic average, the deviation and its time derivative (the explicit bounds , for the periodic deviation and its derivatives on the stated compact state ball), Averaging for fast periodic oscillations: order- agreement on the time scale (order- agreement of with the averaged system on under the trapping condition ), and Adiabatic action drift bound: order- change of the action on the time scale (the order- bound for the drift of the action along a one-frequency branch on the same time scale, conditional on a uniform action-angle chart with and on the branch staying in the chart). Scope and limits of the oscillator, linearization, averaging and adiabatic items on this page records the limits of every one of these statements: finite-time validity, the conditional character of the adiabatic chart hypothesis, the absence of any long-time linearization or stability claim, and the absence of empirical content.
The companion page cm-math-approximation-examples records worked checks: explicit oscillator initial value problems, the resonant response and the two regimes of the amplitude maximum, constant forcing with and without linear drag, a pendulum linearization estimate with explicit constants, an averaging estimate compared with its exact solution, an exactly solvable adiabatic branch compared with the drift bound, a nonuniqueness counterexample without a Lipschitz condition, and a finite-time escape from the domain of a bounded field.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, postulates, theorems and proofs
The damped driven oscillator model: second-order equation, phase-plane system and characteristic data
Definition
Let , and be given real numbers, let be an interval with nonempty interior (Intervals of : the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length) and let be continuous (Continuity of at a point of and on : the - condition, its agreement with at a limit point, and continuity at an isolated point). The damped driven oscillator model with data is the second-order equation
A solution of the model on an interval with nonempty interior is a twice differentiable such that the identity holds for every , derivatives being ordinary real derivatives (The derivative of at a point that is a limit point of , and differentiability on a set, The derivative and the Riemann integral of a vector-valued function: an intrinsic derivative and a componentwise integral). The model is called homogeneous when , undamped when , and strictly damped when .
The phase-plane equation of the model has right-hand side
Here is the phase plane, with coordinates , where is the displacement and the velocity. For an interval with nonempty interior, a differentiable curve solves the phase-plane equation when for every , using the domain-relative derivative at any included endpoint (The derivative of at a point that is a limit point of , and differentiability on a set). If is a solution of the model on , then solves this equation; conversely, if solves it, then and is a solution of the model on . When is open, this is the first-order system of First-order systems, initial value problems, and solutions on intervals on the open domain . For the homogeneous model the right-hand side is written .
The characteristic polynomial of the model is
with discriminant . When define the undamped frequency , the damping rate and, when , the damped frequency ; the corresponding square roots are the nonnegative real ones.
Remarks
-
Equilibrium of the homogeneous phase system. A point satisfies if and only if and ; hence the zero set of is when and the whole line when . For the forced model, holds if and only if and .
-
Interpretation. This item is a purely mathematical model: are real parameters, an arbitrary continuous real function, and no physical units, force law, constitutive assumption or empirical claim is made. The classical-mechanical reading of and any identification with measured data belong to the consuming physics item, not to this definition.
-
Regularity. is continuous relative to and, for each , Lipschitz in with constant , since and . At every interior time , its restriction to a sufficiently small open time interval about satisfies the Picard-Lindelof hypotheses of Picard-Lindelöf local existence and uniqueness for first-order systems. If includes an endpoint, this item does not assert existence across that endpoint unless is also defined on an open time neighborhood there.
Periodic averaging data: the average field, the oscillatory part and the periodic deviation
Definition
Let , let , let be open, and let be continuous (Vector-valued functions , their limits and continuity, with the dictionary to the metric notions). Assume that for each standard coordinate vector of , , and every , the vector-valued derivative at of exists, and that each resulting partial derivative is continuous on (Directional derivatives and partial derivatives of a map ). This is the meaning of continuously partially differentiable in the state variable here. Suppose also that is -periodic in time, that is
The average of such an is the map
where the integral is the componentwise Riemann integral of the continuous curve over the compact interval (The derivative and the Riemann integral of a vector-valued function: an intrinsic derivative and a componentwise integral, Intervals of : the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length); it is well defined and finite for every by componentwise application of A continuous function on is Riemann integrable, by Heine-Cantor and Riemann's criterion. The oscillatory part of is , and the deviation of is
Because by the linearity clause of The derivative and the Riemann integral of a vector-valued function: an intrinsic derivative and a componentwise integral and the componentwise constant-integral formula of If on then for every partition ; in particular every constant function is integrable, with , the formula for and defines a unique extension, again written , to all of ; it satisfies and for all , and on it is the integral displayed above.
The averaged (or reduced) system of for a parameter is the autonomous first-order system on
Remarks
-
Scope. The objects , and the averaged system are pure mathematics: is an arbitrary continuous, -periodic, continuously differentiable-in-state map on . No physical reading of , , or is asserted here; a physical model that identifies them with time, state, a small parameter and a force field is the consumer's responsibility.
-
The deviation is bounded on one period. For nonempty compact , is compact by Heine-Borel in : with the Euclidean metric a subset of is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded, and the proof by bisection uses no choice principle; the same holds on the real line, so is uniformly continuous there by Heine-Cantor: a continuous map from a compact metric space to any metric space is uniformly continuous. The integral norm inequality and monotonicity (For and integrable when , ; for , is integrable, If on and both are integrable then ; and ) give , hence continuity of on . Put . Then is continuous on the compact product and is finite by A continuous real-valued function on a nonempty compact metric space is bounded and attains a greatest and a least value. For and , splitting the integral at and using its orientation gives . Uniform continuity of proves joint continuity of on that product, so its norm has a finite maximum there. The periodic extension preserves this bound; for boundedness is vacuous. Quantitative bounds with explicit constants are supplied separately.
A one-frequency parameter-dependent action-angle branch, its transformed Hamiltonian and its drift generator
Definition
Let , let be open intervals, and let and be intervals with nonempty interiors (Intervals of : the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length). Let and be of class on these open Euclidean domains ( Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms), and suppose is -periodic in its second variable on :
The transformed Hamiltonian of the datum is
its frequency function is
its angle average is , and, on the set where , its drift generator is
The branch vector field of the datum is the restriction to of the map ,
and a branch solution on an interval with nonempty interior is a differentiable satisfying at every , with derivatives relative to at included endpoints. On open time intervals this is the first-order system of First-order systems, initial value problems, and solutions on intervals on the open domain (Directional derivatives and partial derivatives of a map ). Partial derivatives are those of the ambient Euclidean coordinates.
Remarks
-
Angle interpretation. Since is -periodic in , so are and on , hence the restriction of to is -periodic in the second variable: reading the second coordinate in gives a well-defined vector field on , and if is a branch solution, so is for every . The definition keeps the covering description on to avoid quotient notation; all statements about below are invariant under -translations.
-
Reading. A datum of this definition is the normal form of a one-frequency Hamiltonian problem in action-angle coordinates after the slow parameter is promoted to a state variable with : is the angle-independent part, the angle-dependent remainder including any contribution of the parameter-dependent chart, and the fast frequency. The definition asserts no existence theorem: whether a given mechanical family admits such a chart with the stated regularity, on which domain, and with , is a separate hypothesis of any consumer, and the adiabatic statements below are conditional on it.
-
Scope. This is pure mathematics: no physical identification of , , , , , or of the parameter variation with measured data is made here.
Differentiation of a variable-limit convolution integral with a C-one matrix kernel
Statement
Let , equip with the Euclidean inner product and norm of The Euclidean inner product on , and let be an interval with nonempty interior (Intervals of : the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length), let , let be an open interval with , let have entries (The vector space of by matrices over a field, with entrywise operations, Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms) and let be continuous (Vector-valued functions , their limits and continuity, with the dictionary to the metric notions). For and , define . This is a linear map by the coordinate formula; the Euclidean norm is a norm by Cauchy-Schwarz with its equality case, the triangle inequality for , the parallelogram law and polarisation, and the standard coordinate vectors form an ordered basis by The standard list with and for is an ordered basis of ; hence , and is the zero space with basis and dimension , so the map is bounded by A linear map from a finite-dimensional normed space is bounded. Let denote its induced operator norm (The operator norm as the least bound and as the unit-sphere or unit-ball supremum). All matrix actions in the integrals use this convention. Since , the value is defined. Define
with the oriented integral of The derivative and the Riemann integral of a vector-valued function: an intrinsic derivative and a componentwise integral and the matrix action just defined; the integrand is continuous in , hence integrable on every compact subinterval. Then:
- is differentiable at every interior point of (The derivative of at a point that is a limit point of , and differentiability on a set) and
- If moreover is bounded on compact subintervals of (which holds automatically because is ), then is of class on the interior of .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A natural number , an interval with nonempty interior, a point , an open interval , a matrix curve and a continuous curve .
The vector-valued derivative and the oriented Riemann integral are componentwise: and , with ; the integral is additive over subintervals and linear in the integrand (The derivative and the Riemann integral of a vector-valued function: an intrinsic derivative and a componentwise integral, For : is integrable on if and only if it is integrable on and on , and then ; with the oriented form for arbitrary ).
For and an integrable one has , and for real integrable one has (For and integrable when , ; for , is integrable, If on and both are integrable then ; and ). Consequently, for a continuous on the interval with endpoints and , , the supremum over that interval.
Leibniz's rule on a compact rectangle: if are continuous and for every fixed the slice is differentiable on with derivative , then is differentiable on with derivative (Leibniz's rule on a compact rectangle: an interior parameter derivative with a continuous extension may be passed through a Riemann integral). The component maps below satisfy these hypotheses: sums and products of functions are by the chain rule and the algebra of derivatives (The chain rule, in one line from Carathéodory: if is differentiable at and is differentiable at , then is differentiable at with , Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when ).
A closed rectangle in is compact (Heine-Borel in : with the Euclidean metric a subset of is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded, and the proof by bisection uses no choice principle; the same holds on the real line), a continuous map on a compact metric space is uniformly continuous (Heine-Cantor: a continuous map from a compact metric space to any metric space is uniformly continuous), and a continuous real function on a compact interval is bounded and Riemann integrable (A continuous function on is Riemann integrable, by Heine-Cantor and Riemann's criterion, A continuous real-valued function on a nonempty compact metric space is bounded and attains a greatest and a least value).
Differentiability at means that the difference quotients converge to as through nonzero values (The derivative of at a point that is a limit point of , and differentiability on a set).
The matrix action is linear by its coordinate formula (The vector space of by matrices over a field, with entrywise operations, Linear map between vector spaces over the same field). The Euclidean inner product and norm are those of The Euclidean inner product on , this norm makes a normed space by Cauchy-Schwarz with its equality case, the triangle inequality for , the parallelogram law and polarisation, and the standard coordinate vectors form an ordered basis by The standard list with and for is an ordered basis of ; hence , and is the zero space with basis and dimension . Hence each such matrix action is a bounded linear operator by A linear map from a finite-dimensional normed space is bounded, and its induced operator norm is (The operator norm as the least bound and as the unit-sphere or unit-ball supremum).
Proof
Fix and choose with and . For , additivity and linearity of the integral [F1] give with the second integral oriented and taken over the interval with endpoints and ; both integrands are continuous on their compact intervals, since every difference of two points of lies in .
For a component index , put for , where is the compact interval with endpoints and . This is continuous, and for fixed it is differentiable in with , which is continuous on the rectangle; [F3] therefore gives for directly, and for after reversing the orientation and applying [F3] on ; [F1] identifies the components.
For the second term put on the interval with endpoints and . Since is the value of the constant function there, [F1] gives and [F2] bounds its norm by over the interval with endpoints and . As the arguments lie between and (in either order) and tend to , and , so continuity of at and of at makes this supremum tend to ; hence the second term tends to .
Dividing the identity of step 1.1 by , the two summands are precisely the terms analysed in steps 2.1 and 2.2; their limits exist and sum to . By [F5] this is exactly the differentiability assertion of clause 1 at , and was arbitrary.
For clause 2 write by step 3.1, with . The term is continuous. Fix , let be the closed interval with endpoints , and put . Since is an open interval containing the compact interval , choose small enough that and . Put . For , additivity [F1] gives In the first integral, lies between and , so ; in the second, and . By [F2], the first integral has norm at most , which tends to . The second has norm at most , which tends to by uniform continuity of the matrix-valued on . Hence is continuous at , so is continuous on , proving clause 2.
The homogeneous damped oscillator: solution classification by the discriminant and uniqueness for initial data
Statement
Let , and , and consider the homogeneous damped oscillator model of The damped driven oscillator model: second-order equation, phase-plane system and characteristic data with time domain and forcing identically zero, with characteristic polynomial , discriminant , damping rate , and, when applicable, roots
A local solution here may have any interval with nonempty interior, with domain-relative derivatives at included endpoints. It has a unique extension to the global family below. A maximal solution means one that has no solution extension to a strictly larger interval; the maximal solutions of this global autonomous equation are precisely the family members on . For a homogeneous model restricted to a time domain , its solutions have and are restrictions of these same global members; their extensions solve the all- equation.
-
Distinct real roots. If , then are exactly the real roots of , and a function on an interval with nonempty interior is a solution of the model if and only if for some .
-
Double real root. If , then is the only root of , and is a solution if and only if for some .
-
Complex conjugate roots. If , then , the roots of are , and is a solution if and only if for some .
-
Initial data. In each of the three cases and for every there is exactly one solution with and . Its coefficients are
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The parameters , , , the homogeneous model of The damped driven oscillator model: second-order equation, phase-plane system and characteristic data with and , its phase-plane field , the characteristic polynomial , the discriminant , and, in the three cases, the constants of the statement.
The model, its solutions, the phase-plane system and the characteristic data are those of The damped driven oscillator model: second-order equation, phase-plane system and characteristic data with and : solves the model on exactly when solves on ; is continuous and locally Lipschitz in the state variable, with the global state-Lipschitz constant on . [given]
Local uniqueness and Lipschitz dependence: under the hypotheses of Continuous and Lipschitz dependence on the initial condition on a Picard-Lindelof cylinder with field , , centre , radius , , state-Lipschitz constant , and with , , for every the initial value problem , has exactly one solution on with graph in . [given]
Differentiation rules: for real the real exponential satisfies ; for complex and real the complex exponential satisfies ; sums, products and composites are differentiated by the algebra of derivatives and the chain rule; and . [thm-derivative-of-exponential, thm-complex-exponential-is-entire-with-derivative-itself, thm-algebra-of-derivatives, thm-chain-rule, thm-sine-and-cosine-derivatives]
Euler's form: for real and , . [cor-complex-exponential-cartesian-form-modulus-and-eulers-identity, given]
Proof
Algebraic reduction: for all , Hence: if the real roots of are exactly with ; if then is the only root, a double one; and if then has no real root, for the positive number , and the complex roots of are because . In particular in case 1 and in case 2.
Verification of the real-root families. [assume-case 1, assume-case 2] For a real number with the function satisfies by [F3]; and satisfies since and by [F3]; this vanishes exactly when , that is , and then also . By step 1.1 the roots in case 1 and the double root in case 2 do satisfy , so by linearity of the differential expression every and every is a solution on every interval.
Verification of the oscillatory family. [assume-case 3] Let , so that by step 1.1; by [F3] the complex-valued curve satisfies . Real and imaginary parts of a complex-valued solution of a real linear constant-coefficient equation solve that equation, by componentwise differentiation; by [F4], , so and are real solutions, and every is one by linearity. This family too is defined on all of .
Matching initial data: in case 1, the two linear conditions and are solved uniquely by the coefficients displayed in clause 4 because , and substitution verifies , . In case 2, has and by [F3], giving , . In case 3, has and, by [F3], , giving and since . Thus in each case there is a global solution with the prescribed data.
Exhaustiveness and uniqueness. [cases-exhaustive: , , ] Let solve the model on an interval with nonempty interior and choose an arbitrary . For the ordered fundamental pairs , and , the determinant of their value/derivative matrix is respectively , and , by [F3]. Each is nonzero, so there is a unique combination from the corresponding global family with and . Put . This set is nonempty and relatively closed by phase-curve continuity. It is relatively open: at choose a closed time neighborhood in and a state ball centered at the common phase value, containing both curves on a smaller time neighborhood. Choose within that neighborhood with and . Since is autonomous, translate to zero and apply [F2] with to the two phase curves; uniqueness gives equality on this neighborhood. The interval is connected, so . Continuity extends the equality to any endpoints belonging to , proving . Thus every local solution is a restriction of exactly one global member of the appropriate family. In particular the global members matched in step 3.1 are the unique solutions with the prescribed data at zero, and all four clauses follow. A proper interval solution therefore has a strictly larger all- extension, whereas an all- solution has no larger real time interval; this proves the maximality assertion. The same classification applies to a restricted homogeneous model on by restricting these family members to .
The degenerate and repulsive oscillator: solutions for k=0 and the explicit growing solution for k<0
Statement
Let , , let , and consider the model of The damped driven oscillator model: second-order equation, phase-plane system and characteristic data with time domain and forcing identically zero. In the three cases below, runs over solutions on intervals with nonempty interior.
A local solution here may have any interval with nonempty interior, with domain-relative derivatives at included endpoints. It has a unique extension to the global family below. A maximal solution means one that has no solution extension to a strictly larger interval; the maximal solutions of this global autonomous equation are precisely the family members on . For a homogeneous model restricted to a time domain , its solutions have and are restrictions of these same global members; their extensions solve the all- equation.
- Double zero root (, ). Then on every such interval , solves the model if and only if for some ; each such local solution is the restriction of a unique global member of this family. For every datum there is a unique global solution on with , , namely .
- Simple zero root (, ). Then on every such interval , solves the model if and only if for some ; each such local solution is the restriction of a unique global member of this family. For every datum there is a unique global solution on with , , namely the member with and . This global solution has limit as ; any local solution on an interval unbounded above has the same limit along that interval.
- One positive and one negative root (). Put Then , both are real roots of the characteristic polynomial, and on every such interval , solves the model if and only if for some ; each such local solution is the restriction of a global member of this family. In particular the global solution has data , and satisfies as : the model has an unbounded solution growing exponentially on .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The parameters , , , the model of The damped driven oscillator model: second-order equation, phase-plane system and characteristic data with , and phase field , and the constants of case 3.
The model, its solutions and the phase-plane system are those of The damped driven oscillator model: second-order equation, phase-plane system and characteristic data with and ; is a solution on exactly when solves on , and for the field is linear, hence continuous and globally Lipschitz in the state variable. [given]
Local uniqueness: Continuous and Lipschitz dependence on the initial condition on a Picard-Lindelof cylinder in the form used before: for the Lipschitz field , any two solutions of defined on a common interval and taking the same value at one point agree on that interval (this is its "exactly one solution through given data with graph in a Picard-Lindelof cylinder" clause together with the cylinder-local uniqueness, applied along the interval). [given]
Derivative rules: for real ; sums and products are differentiated by the algebra of derivatives and the chain rule. [thm-derivative-of-exponential, thm-algebra-of-derivatives, thm-chain-rule]
A differentiable function on an interval with identically zero derivative is constant (A function continuous on an interval whose derivative vanishes at every interior point of is constant on ; consequently two such functions with the same derivative differ by a constant). [def-interval]
Fundamental theorem of calculus for continuous integrands: if is a primitive of a continuous on an interval containing and , then for the evaluation clause of Every continuous function on an interval has a primitive; two primitives differ by a constant; and for any primitive gives . For , The integral with oriented limits: and gives by the same clause on ; for both sides vanish. Thus the formula holds for every ordering of .
The real exponential is strictly increasing, and its image is . [thm-exponential-is-strictly-increasing, cor-exponential-is-a-bijection-onto-positive-reals]
Proof
Case , . [assume-case 1] The model is . By [F4], is a constant on , and has zero derivative, hence is a constant on . Thus every solution on an arbitrary interval is , and conversely each such function solves by [F3]. For a global solution the data at zero give , .
Case , . [assume-case 2] Put . By [F3], , so [F4] gives for a constant on . Fix . Applying [F5] to the primitives and of gives for every . Hence and for constants with , without requiring . Conversely this family solves by [F3] and extends globally. Its extension is unique: if two such global members agree on , their difference vanishes on the nonempty open interval ; differentiating there and using and gives , then . On the global member, data at zero give and . The exponential term tends to zero at by monotonicity and surjectivity of the exponential in [F6]: for any , choose with ; whenever , and . Thus the global extension has limit ; when is unbounded above, the original solution agrees with this extension on its positive-time tail and has the same limit.
Case . [assume-case 3] Here , so and ; the completing-square identity shows that are exactly the two real roots of the characteristic polynomial. For a real root , solves the model because and by [F3]; by linearity every solves it. Finally as : given , surjectivity in [F6] gives with , and monotonicity gives for all .
Uniqueness and exhaustiveness. [cases-exhaustive: ; ; ] Cases 1 and 2 exhaust the arbitrary-interval solution sets by steps 1.1 and 1.2. In case 3 choose any . The value/derivative matrix of and at has determinant , so a unique global family member matches . By [F1] the full phase curves solve the same system, and [F2] gives equality on : cylinder-local uniqueness propagates on the connected interior using the closed-and-open set where both phase components agree, then extends to included endpoints by continuity. Thus . Each explicit family is defined on , its coefficient/data map at zero is invertible, and these exhaust all solutions, proving global existence and uniqueness for prescribed data. The repulsive member with data grows without bound by step 1.3. Because every interval solution has a unique all- extension and has no larger real time interval, these global family members are exactly the maximal solutions. Restricting them to gives the solutions of a restricted homogeneous model on .
Variation of constants for via the matrix exponential
Statement
Let , equip with the Euclidean inner product and norm of The Euclidean inner product on , let (The vector space of by matrices over a field, with entrywise operations), let and , and let be continuous (The derivative and the Riemann integral of a vector-valued function: an intrinsic derivative and a componentwise integral). The Euclidean norm is a norm by Cauchy-Schwarz with its equality case, the triangle inequality for , the parallelogram law and polarisation, and the standard coordinate vectors form an ordered basis by The standard list with and for is an ordered basis of ; hence , and is the zero space with basis and dimension . For and , define ; this is a linear map by Linear map between vector spaces over the same field, hence bounded by A linear map from a finite-dimensional normed space is bounded, and denotes its induced Euclidean operator norm (The operator norm as the least bound and as the unit-sphere or unit-ball supremum). Matrix powers and products use Rectangular matrix multiplication and the identity matrix , including zero-sized shapes; their action agrees with composition of the corresponding linear maps by distributing the finite sums in the displayed coordinate formula. Define the matrix exponential
Then:
- is well defined and of class , with , , for all , and for the operator norm (The operator norm as the least bound and as the unit-sphere or unit-ball supremum) subordinate to the Euclidean norm.
- The map satisfies and for every .
- Uniqueness: if is an interval with nonempty interior containing (Intervals of : the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length) and is differentiable with on and , then .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , identified with a linear endomorphism of , , a continuous , and the matrix exponential displayed above.
The matrix action defined in the Statement is a bounded linear endomorphism of normed Euclidean : the Euclidean norm is a norm, and the standard coordinate vectors form a finite ordered basis, so the finite-dimensional boundedness theorem applies (The Euclidean inner product on , Cauchy-Schwarz with its equality case, the triangle inequality for , the parallelogram law and polarisation, The standard list with and for is an ordered basis of ; hence , and is the zero space with basis and dimension , A linear map from a finite-dimensional normed space is bounded). Its induced metric agrees with (The Euclidean inner product on ), which is complete ( and for with the Euclidean metric are complete, componentwise from the Cauchy criterion in ); hence this normed space is Banach. For matrices and , , so matrix multiplication represents composition (Rectangular matrix multiplication and the identity matrix , including zero-sized shapes). The exponential series lemma applies to and gives absolute convergence in operator norm, with , , and (The exponential series of a bounded operator).
The convolution differentiation lemma (Differentiation of a variable-limit convolution integral with a C-one matrix kernel) applies with interval , open kernel domain , and : for every , the map is differentiable with derivative .
Differentiation rules: the chain rule and the algebra of derivatives differentiate products and compositions; for a differentiable matrix curve and constant vector , is differentiable with derivative . [thm-chain-rule, thm-algebra-of-derivatives]
Fundamental theorem for continuous derivatives: if is differentiable with continuous derivative on an interval containing , then (If is differentiable with integrable then ; and a bounded derivative makes Lipschitz); and (For and integrable when , ; for , is integrable, The derivative and the Riemann integral of a vector-valued function: an intrinsic derivative and a componentwise integral).
Gronwall: if a continuous real satisfies for with constants , then ; the time-reflected form with the integral from to applies for (Gronwall's integral inequality with variable and constant coefficients).
Proof
By [F1] the exponential is with , , and for all ; in particular is differentiable with derivative , by the chain rule for the affine inner map .
By step 1.1 and [F3], has derivative . By [F2] the integral term has derivative , where the second identity uses of step 1.1 and linearity of the integral. Hence by linearity of matrix-vector multiplication. Moreover , so clause 2 holds.
For clause 3 let solve on an interval containing with , and put . By step 2.1, and , so by [F4] and therefore for and the reflected inequality for . Applying [F5] with and to the nonnegative continuous function gives on both sides of , hence and .
Strictly damped homogeneous oscillator with : every solution tends to zero
Statement
Let , and , let be a solution of the homogeneous model with time domain and (The damped driven oscillator model: second-order equation, phase-plane system and characteristic data, The homogeneous damped oscillator: solution classification by the discriminant and uniqueness for initial data), and write , , in case and in case . Then as (Limits at and , and infinite limits at a point); more precisely, with the coefficients of the solution in the notation of The homogeneous damped oscillator: solution classification by the discriminant and uniqueness for initial data:
- if : and for all ;
- if : and for all ;
- if : and for all .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , , , a solution of the homogeneous model, and the notation of the statement.
The solution is one of the three explicit families of The homogeneous damped oscillator: solution classification by the discriminant and uniqueness for initial data, on all of , with the coefficients of the relevant case. [given]
Signs: if then because gives and hence ; if then ; and . [F1, algebra]
Ranges: and for every real (Signs, monotonicity intervals, and ranges of sine and cosine).
Exponential limits: as and as (The exponential tends to at and to at ); consequently for , as . The reciprocal identity and positivity hold by The exponential is positive and satisfies . For and , the exponential series has nonnegative terms, so and hence (The real exponential function and the number by a power series, A series of nonnegative terms converges iff its partial sums are bounded, and then the sum is their supremum).
Convergence to at is the quantified assertion of Limits at and , and infinite limits at a point: for every there is with for all .
The real exponential is strictly increasing (The exponential function is strictly increasing), so implies .
Proof
Bounds for the three families. [assume-case 1, assume-case 2, assume-case 3] By [F1], in case 1 the solution is with ; since and give , [F6] gives , the triangle inequality yields . In case 2, . In case 3, by [F3].
The three majorants tend to zero at . By [F2] the exponents are negative, so and by [F4]. For the middle case, [F4] gives : given , every has ; hence and therefore .
Since is bounded above in each case by the corresponding majorant, and all three majorants tend to , [F5] gives as in each case; the estimates are those displayed in clause 1.
The forced oscillator with : unique global solution and the convolution (Green's function) formula
Statement
Let , , , let be an interval with nonempty interior (Intervals of : the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length) and let be continuous. Fix and data . Let be the (unique) solution of the associated homogeneous model with time domain and zero forcing, with and .
Then:
- There is exactly one solution of the forced model with and . It is twice differentiable on , with derivatives at included endpoints taken relative to , and is continuous on in its relative topology.
- If is any homogeneous solution with and (it exists and is unique by The homogeneous damped oscillator: solution classification by the discriminant and uniqueness for initial data and The degenerate and repulsive oscillator: solutions for k=0 and the explicit growing solution for k<0), then
Remarks
- Explicit kernel. For and one has with ; for , and one has with and ; for , one has ; and for one has . These are the solutions of the homogeneous initial value problem displayed in The homogeneous damped oscillator: solution classification by the discriminant and uniqueness for initial data clauses 1-3 and The degenerate and repulsive oscillator: solutions for k=0 and the explicit growing solution for k<0 clauses 1-2, read off at the data ; the overdamped case has the two-exponential form .
- Scope. This is a statement about the linear model of The damped driven oscillator model: second-order equation, phase-plane system and characteristic data only: is an arbitrary continuous real function, and no physical interpretation of or of the formula as a superposition of physical impulses is asserted. The name "Green's function" here denotes the kernel of the convolution formula, not a distribution-theoretic object.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The parameters , , , the interval with nonempty interior, the continuous , the point and the data . The homogeneous kernel and member solve the associated all- homogeneous model; the forced model uses the given time domain . No extension of outside is used.
The model and its phase-plane system are those of The damped driven oscillator model: second-order equation, phase-plane system and characteristic data; solves the forced model on exactly when solves on . [given]
For the homogeneous model has exactly one global solution for every initial datum, and its three explicit solution families are those of The homogeneous damped oscillator: solution classification by the discriminant and uniqueness for initial data clauses 1-3; in particular the solution with data exists, is unique and is defined on all of . [given]
For the homogeneous model has exactly the solution families of The degenerate and repulsive oscillator: solutions for k=0 and the explicit growing solution for k<0 clauses 1-2, and every interval solution extends to a global member; in particular with data exists, is unique and is defined on all of . [given]
Convolution differentiation (Differentiation of a variable-limit convolution integral with a C-one matrix kernel): if is an interval, , is open with , is and is continuous, then is differentiable with derivative . Here , , ; when is , the same application with is legitimate. [given]
Homogeneous uniqueness from Variation of constants for via the matrix exponential: for a fixed and the globally continuous forcing , the global solution of with zero datum is , and every differentiable solution on an interval containing its initial time with that datum is its restriction. [given]
Proof
The kernel exists, is unique and is defined on all of by [F2] (case ) and [F3] (case ), with and . Since solves , we have ; the right-hand side is continuous because and are, so is continuous and is of class on .
Put for . Applying [F4] with kernel and gives, at every interior point, and applying [F4] once more with the kernel (legitimate by step 1.1) gives If includes an endpoint, the same split-difference-quotient argument as in the proof of Differentiation of a variable-limit convolution integral with a C-one matrix kernel applies with increments restricted to the side lying in ; it gives these formulas for the domain-relative endpoint derivatives, first for with kernel and then for with kernel . The displayed right-hand sides are continuous on , since are continuous and the integrals vary continuously on compact subintervals. In particular and .
Let be a homogeneous solution with the data (existing by [F2], [F3]) and set on . [construct] Then is twice differentiable on with continuous second derivative, using domain-relative derivatives at included endpoints, and, by step 2.1 and the linearity of the differential expression, because the bracket vanishes identically by step 1.1. Moreover and .
Uniqueness: let be any other solution with the prescribed data and put , where is the constructed solution of step 3.1. By linearity, solves the homogeneous equation on with . Its phase curve therefore solves on with , where . Apply [F5] with the globally continuous forcing : the unique global solution from zero data is zero, and clause 3 of the matrix variation-of-constants result makes every interval solution with the same data its restriction. Thus and . This proves uniqueness using only a forcing defined on its actual domain for the constructed solution.
Forced quadratic system : decoupled forced modes and the convolution solution
Statement
Let , let be symmetric positive definite, let be symmetric and non-negative, let with orthogonal and , (Decoupling of the constant-coefficient quadratic system into normal modes, with the zero-mode and energy identities), let be an interval with nonempty interior (Intervals of : the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length), let be continuous and let . Put
and for a curve whose first and second derivatives exist on (relative to at included endpoints) and whose second derivative is continuous on , put . Then:
- solves the forced quadratic system on if and only if solves the decoupled forced system on .
- For each , the unique solution of the scalar equation in clause 1 with data , is
- Consequently, for every initial datum there is exactly one solution of with that datum, and it is for the of clause 2.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The symmetric positive definite , symmetric non-negative , the orthogonal diagonalisation , the interval , the continuous , the point , and the transformed forcing .
The quadratic-mode theorem (Decoupling of the constant-coefficient quadratic system into normal modes, with the zero-mode and energy identities) supplies the positive-definite square-root factors and an orthogonal diagonalisation with . Its scalar solution classification is stated only for intervals containing ; the present interval is arbitrary, so the proof below uses only this algebraic diagonalisation and verifies the forced scalar responses at the prescribed .
The forced oscillator theorem (The forced oscillator with : unique global solution and the convolution (Green's function) formula) applies on this arbitrary interval at the specified : with , , and continuous , it gives exactly one solution and its homogeneous-plus-convolution formula. The homogeneous classification (The homogeneous damped oscillator: solution classification by the discriminant and uniqueness for initial data) and degenerate proposition (The degenerate and repulsive oscillator: solutions for k=0 and the explicit growing solution for k<0) classify homogeneous solutions on every interval. For , translating an interval by gives one containing , where the classification determines the homogeneous member from its data; for the proposition directly determines the affine member from its value and derivative at . Trigonometric derivatives and values at zero are , , , and (The derivatives of sine and cosine are cosine and minus sine).
, , and are the matrices of the modal theorem; and . [given]
Proof
Transport: differentiating twice gives , hence by the definition of and [F1], and is invertible. Therefore is equivalent to , which is the decoupled system of clause 1.
The -th scalar equation is an oscillator equation with , , and continuous forcing ; by [F2] its unique solution on with data at is the homogeneous solution with those data plus . If , set . By the chain rule and trigonometric derivatives in [F2], , , and ; translating any competing homogeneous solution to an interval containing and applying the classification in [F2] proves uniqueness. If , directly solves the homogeneous equation with the required data and is the unique affine family member. Likewise for and for solve the homogeneous equation and have , ; the classified families give uniqueness of the kernel. Substitution in the forced theorem's formula gives exactly the two expressions in clause 2.
Clauses 1 and 2 exhibit as the unique solution of the decoupled forced system with prescribed data; since is a bijection with linear and invertible (), clause 3 follows.
Sinusoidal forcing: the steady response, its amplitude and phase, and resonance at
Conventions
For a bounded real-valued curve , its amplitude about zero means .
Statement
Let , , , let and , and consider the forced model with time domain and forcing , (The damped driven oscillator model: second-order equation, phase-plane system and characteristic data). Put
-
Non-resonant response. If , then the function is a solution of the forced model on all of . Its amplitude about zero is . For and , a phase-lag angle relative to the drive means a real such that for every , with the signed factor retained in both drive and response. Such an angle exists: any satisfying has this property. No temporal phase is assigned when or .
-
Resonance. If and , then and is a solution of the forced model on all of ; if then is unbounded on .
-
Transient decay. If , then for every , and every solution of the forced model satisfies where is a homogeneous solution; consequently as (Limits at and , and infinite limits at a point) and is bounded on .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The parameters , , , the number and frequency , the all- forcing and , and .
The model and its phase system are those of The damped driven oscillator model: second-order equation, phase-plane system and characteristic data; the differential expression is linear over , so sums of solutions of the forced and homogeneous equations are solutions of the corresponding forced equation. [given]
Complex exponential: for complex and real , and , so ; complex conjugation and modulus are those of Real and imaginary parts, complex conjugation, and modulus, with and for . [thm-complex-exponential-is-entire-with-derivative-itself, cor-complex-exponential-cartesian-form-modulus-and-eulers-identity, def-complex-conjugate-real-imaginary-part-and-modulus]
Real derivatives: , ; sums and products are differentiated by the algebra of derivatives and the chain rule; and sine has period . [thm-sine-and-cosine-derivatives, thm-algebra-of-derivatives, thm-chain-rule, thm-quarter-turn-values-and-shift-formulas, thm-sine-cosine-zero-sets-and-fundamental-period]
For , every homogeneous solution is one of the three families of The homogeneous damped oscillator: solution classification by the discriminant and uniqueness for initial data, and if every homogeneous solution satisfies and is bounded on by Strictly damped homogeneous oscillator with : every solution tends to zero. [given]
Sine and cosine have range (Signs, monotonicity intervals, and ranges of sine and cosine); , and (Parity and the Pythagorean identity for sine and cosine). The addition formulas (The addition formulas for sine and cosine) and parity give for all real .
Proof
Non-resonant case. [assume-case 1] Suppose and put . By [F2], and , hence The differential expression has real coefficients and the real and imaginary parts of a complex-valued function may be differentiated separately, so satisfies on . The displayed real form follows from [F2] and , , . For the amplitude, put , and . By [F5], , so . If , then and , attaining that bound. If , the cosine range in [F5] supplies a real with ; the Pythagorean identity gives since , and replacing by if necessary makes while preserving its cosine. At the numerator equals , attaining . This also covers , proving the stated amplitude. When and , take from that construction. For this angle, and for any other angle with the stated sine and cosine, the difference formula in [F5] gives ; therefore for every , proving the phase relation with the declared signed convention.
Resonance. [assume-case 2] Suppose and , and put , so that and . By [F3], so : it is a solution on . For each , put . These times are nonnegative and tend to because and . Integer periodicity and the quarter-turn value in [F3] give , so whenever ; hence is unbounded on .
Transient decay. [assume-case 3, cases-exhaustive: ; , ; ] Suppose ; then would force , hence and , a contradiction, so for every and step 1.1 supplies the solution . Let be any solution of the forced model. Then satisfies the homogeneous model by linearity [F1]; by [F4] it is one of the three families of the classification theorem, and since , Strictly damped homogeneous oscillator with : every solution tends to zero gives as and boundedness of on ; is bounded by [F5] because , and in the real form of step 1.1. Hence and is bounded.
The amplitude of the sinusoidally forced damped oscillator: location and value of its maximum
Statement
Let , , and . For let
be the amplitude about zero of the steady response of Sinusoidal forcing: the steady response, its amplitude and phase, and resonance at clause 1, and put
Then:
- If (equivalently ), is strictly increasing on , strictly decreasing on , and its maximum on is attained at and at no other point, with
- If then is strictly decreasing on and its maximum on is attained at and at no other point.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The parameters , , , , the amplitude function of the statement and the number .
For every the denominator is strictly positive, and with ; this is the amplitude computed in Sinusoidal forcing: the steady response, its amplitude and phase, and resonance at clause 1. [given]
Derivatives: for a differentiable with on an interval, is strictly increasing there, and with strictly decreasing, by the mean value theorem (The mean value theorem, as the case of Cauchy's: for continuous on with and differentiable on there is with ); polynomials are differentiated by the algebra of derivatives and the power rule, and composites by the chain rule. [thm-algebra-of-derivatives, lem-derivative-of-a-power, thm-chain-rule, def-interval]
For one has and , and is strictly increasing on (Inverses of positives are positive, and reciprocation reverses order, Squaring is monotone on the nonnegatives, with nonnegative roots supplied by Square roots exist: a unique with ; the positives are ). [def-interval]
Proof
Write and . [assume-case 1, assume-case 2] Expanding and using gives and the constant is , because and ; in particular is a quadratic with positive leading coefficient and unique global minimiser and . Also if and only if ; in this branch , so . For every , : at it equals , and at the second summand is positive.
Monotonicity of : by [F2], its derivative is . Hence if this derivative is negative on and positive on , so is strictly decreasing on and strictly increasing on (strictness on the closed intervals follows from [F2] on every subinterval and continuity); if the derivative is positive on , so is strictly increasing on .
Conclusion. [cases-exhaustive: ; ] If , then on the value strictly decreases to and on it strictly increases from ; since is strictly decreasing on and strictly increasing on by [F3], is strictly increasing on and strictly decreasing on , so its maximum is attained exactly at , with . If , then is strictly increasing on , so is strictly decreasing there and its maximum is attained exactly at .
Remarks
- The undamped case. For the same computation gives , whose zero is , i.e. ; there the denominator of the steady-response formula vanishes and (the modulus of the response function) is unbounded above in every neighbourhood of meeting . Hence for the amplitude has no maximum on ; it is strictly increasing on , which is the increasing branch that persists in the case above. This matches the resonant case of Sinusoidal forcing: the steady response, its amplitude and phase, and resonance at clause 2, where the response has absolute values tending to infinity along the quarter-turn sequence when .
Elementary bounds for the periodic average, the deviation and its time derivative
Statement
Let , , open, and let be continuous, continuously partially differentiable in the second variable and -periodic in time, with average , oscillatory part and periodic deviation as in Periodic averaging data: the average field, the oscillatory part and the periodic deviation (Intervals of : the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length). Here denotes the total derivative in the state variable, with coordinate columns ; it exists and is continuous by If all partial derivatives exist on a neighbourhood and are continuous at a point, then the map is totally differentiable there with Jacobian derivative. The same notation is used for and when those total derivatives exist. Let , with (Open ball, closed ball and sphere in a metric space) and let satisfy
Then:
- and for all .
- is -periodic and for every and ; moreover for all and .
- for every ; consequently for and for all and .
- has continuous first partial derivatives on ; its partial derivative in the second variable is , and for , , with the operator norm on (The operator norm as the least bound and as the unit-sphere or unit-ball supremum). In particular is totally differentiable at every point of (If all partial derivatives exist on a neighbourhood and are continuous at a point, then the map is totally differentiable there with Jacobian derivative).
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The data of Periodic averaging data: the average field, the oscillatory part and the periodic deviation, the ball centre , radius , constants , and the derived objects and .
is continuous in ; for fixed , is continuous on and hence Riemann integrable there; the integrals below are componentwise oriented integrals (Periodic averaging data: the average field, the oscillatory part and the periodic deviation, The derivative and the Riemann integral of a vector-valued function: an intrinsic derivative and a componentwise integral, Vector-valued functions , their limits and continuity, with the dictionary to the metric notions).
For integrable vector-valued and : , and for real integrable : ; for constant and : (For and integrable when , ; for , is integrable, If on and both are integrable then ; and ).
Fundamental theorem of calculus: if is continuous on an interval and , then is a primitive of on (Every continuous function on an interval has a primitive; two primitives differ by a constant; and for any primitive ); in particular has derivative at every point of , and a periodic function is determined by its values on .
Leibniz's rule on a compact rectangle (Leibniz's rule on a compact rectangle: an interior parameter derivative with a continuous extension may be passed through a Riemann integral): if are continuous and for every fixed the slice is differentiable with derivative , then has derivative . The componentwise application of this rule to (whose partial derivatives in the state variable are continuous by hypothesis) supplies the identities of step 3.1 (If all partial derivatives exist on a neighbourhood and are continuous at a point, then the map is totally differentiable there with Jacobian derivative for the passage from partial derivatives to the total derivative).
A continuous scalar function on an interval with zero derivative at every interior point is constant (A function continuous on an interval whose derivative vanishes at every interior point of is constant on ; consequently two such functions with the same derivative differ by a constant); applying this to every coordinate gives the same assertion for vector-valued functions.
Proof
Bounds for : for , by [F2]; and for in the ball, again by [F2] and the assumed Lipschitz bound; this is clause 1.
Bounds for : for and in the ball, step 1.1 and [F2] give and for in the ball, Since is -periodic by its definition (it satisfies and ), the same bounds hold for all ; this is clause 2.
Time derivative: fix and put , a continuous -valued function; on the fundamental theorem [F4] gives . At the right difference quotient converges to , while for periodicity reduces the quotient to the left derivative of at , namely by periodicity of ; the same argument at every shows the derivative exists there with the same value, and away from these points it is . Hence everywhere. The oriented integral has the same derivative by [F4], so has zero derivative and vanishes at zero; [F6] gives for every real . The bounds on follow from the triangle inequality and step 1.1: and ; this is clause 3.
Second-variable derivative and its norm bound: first fix . For in the open ball and any unit vector , the assumed state-Lipschitz estimate gives for every sufficiently small nonzero ; taking yields . For a boundary point , the sequence lies in the open ball and tends to , so continuity of gives the same bound at . Taking the supremum over unit proves throughout the closed ball. Next fix any and a component index . The map , with near , is continuous and has continuous partial derivatives in ; [F5] applied componentwise at fixed and gives (first for in a compact interval, then by additivity for all ), and likewise . For and every unit , the vector integral inequality [F2] now gives , hence . Using the all-time integral identity of step 2.2, , continuously in . For , and every unit , another application of [F2] gives Taking the supremum over unit proves on one period; periodicity gives the same bound for all . This proves clause 4.
Finite-time linearization error bound: quadratic remainder, exponential growth bound and the variation-of-constants estimate
Statement
Let , let be open with , let be continuous and locally Lipschitz in the state variable, and let , , and satisfy (Open ball, closed ball and sphere in a metric space) and
where and use the matrix-action and induced Euclidean operator-norm convention of Variation of constants for via the matrix exponential.
Let with , let with , and let be the solution of the linear system , (Variation of constants for via the matrix exponential). Then:
- The maximal solution of , is defined on and satisfies for (Extensions, maximal solutions, maximal intervals, and global solutions).
- For every , where is the operator norm of for the Euclidean norm (The operator norm as the least bound and as the unit-sphere or unit-ball supremum).
Remarks
-
Where the quadratic remainder comes from. If is Lipschitz on with constant — equivalently, by the mean value inequality, if there — then for and the identity (fundamental theorem for the vector-valued curve , If is differentiable with integrable then ; and a bounded derivative makes Lipschitz) gives , so the hypothesis holds with (The mean value inequality: if is continuous and differentiable on with , then , Lipschitz map, -Hölder map for rational , and contraction). For fields with on the ball this is the case.
-
Scope. The bound is a finite-time statement on under the explicit smallness condition ; it asserts neither global validity of the linear approximation nor stability of the equilibrium, and it does not identify the nonlinear solution with the linear one beyond the displayed order- estimate.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The field and constants as in the statement, the datum with , the time with , and the linear solution with the matrix exponential of .
is continuous and locally Lipschitz in the state variable (Lipschitz map, -Hölder map for rational , and contraction for the Lipschitz terminology); on the compact ball the field is bounded by and Lipschitz with some finite constant (Heine-Borel in : with the Euclidean metric a subset of is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded, and the proof by bisection uses no choice principle; the same holds on the real line, Open ball, closed ball and sphere in a metric space). [given]
Local existence on a Picard-Lindelof cylinder and the a priori Lipschitz estimate are provided by Continuous and Lipschitz dependence on the initial condition on a Picard-Lindelof cylinder; every initial value problem has a unique maximal solution, and any solution is a restriction of it (Every Picard–Lindelöf initial value problem has one maximal solution on an open interval, Extensions, maximal solutions, maximal intervals, and global solutions). [given]
Compact continuation: a solution whose graph stays in a compact subset of near a finite endpoint extends past that endpoint (Compact continuation for locally Lipschitz ODEs: a solution whose graph stays in a compact subset of the domain near a finite endpoint extends past it). [given]
A curve solves through exactly when for in its interval of definition, and moreover (A first-order initial value problem is equivalent to its Volterra integral equation, For and integrable when , ; for , is integrable, If on and both are integrable then ; and , The derivative and the Riemann integral of a vector-valued function: an intrinsic derivative and a componentwise integral). [given]
Gronwall: if continuous satisfies on , then there (Gronwall's integral inequality with variable and constant coefficients). [given]
Matrix exponential data (Variation of constants for via the matrix exponential, The operator norm as the least bound and as the unit-sphere or unit-ball supremum): is , , , and ; in particular is the global solution of , , obtained by taking the globally continuous forcing .
Proof
Let be the maximal solution through and let be that part of its interval on which ; while , [F4] and the bound give so [F5] yields for all . In particular, if and then .
The maximal solution is defined on all of . Indeed, if its forward interval ended at some , then the graph of on would lie in the compact set by step 1.1 applied on — more precisely, should reach at some first time , step 1.1 would give at that time, a contradiction; so for all in the maximal forward interval that are , and the graph stays in the compact subset . By [F3] the solution extends past every finite endpoint below or at , so it is defined on and step 1.1 gives there; this is clause 1.
Finite-interval comparison identity: on put and . The curve is continuous on , and , . Define . By [F6], the chain rule and product rule, since . The vector-valued fundamental theorem of calculus, applied on the actual interval , gives ; multiplying by and using [F6]'s group law yields This derivation uses only the continuous values of on . Consequently, using for , the quadratic remainder hypothesis and clause 1, for every .
For the final estimate, and on , so ; substituting into step 3.1 gives the displayed product bound. This proves clause 2.
Averaging for fast periodic oscillations: order- agreement on the time scale
Statement
Let , , let be open, and let be continuous, continuously partially differentiable in the second variable and -periodic in time, with average and deviation as in Periodic averaging data: the average field, the oscillatory part and the periodic deviation. Here is the total derivative in the state variable defined in Elementary bounds for the periodic average, the deviation and its time derivative. Let , let with (Open ball, closed ball and sphere in a metric space), and let satisfy
being the operator norm (The operator norm as the least bound and as the unit-sphere or unit-ball supremum). Put
where and are parameters. Suppose is a solution of the averaged system
If , then the solution of , exists on all of and satisfies, for every ,
Remarks
- Scaling. The two curves agree to order on the time interval of length , For a fixed period , this horizon contains periods. The constant is explicit and grows like ; no claim is made for times longer than or beyond the trapping radius .
- Scope. , , , , are mathematical objects; no physical identification or empirical claim is made. The theorem compares two explicitly specified ODE solutions; the averaged system is a different model, not an exact description.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The data , the derived , and the parameters , , with a solution of the averaged system.
Derivative-to-Lipschitz bound and periodic-deviation bounds: for each fixed , the map is -Lipschitz on the convex ball . Indeed, for in the ball the segment lies in it, the composite is differentiable with derivative , and the vector-valued fundamental theorem estimate gives (If all partial derivatives exist on a neighbourhood and are continuous at a point, then the map is totally differentiable there with Jacobian derivative, The chain rule for total derivatives: , If is differentiable with integrable then ; and a bounded derivative makes Lipschitz). Thus Elementary bounds for the periodic average, the deviation and its time derivative applies and gives and on the ball; for , ; there; ; and is totally differentiable on . [given]
The field is continuous. Near any , choose a time interval and a convex state ball contained in on which continuity of bounds its operator norm by some finite . For each fixed time in that interval, the line-segment argument of [F1], with in place of , gives for states in that ball. This is local Lipschitz continuity in the state variable as defined in Local Lipschitz continuity in the state variable, locally uniform in time and parameters, so the Picard-Lindelof theorem gives a unique maximal solution of the initial-value problem (First-order systems, initial value problems, and solutions on intervals, Every Picard–Lindelöf initial value problem has one maximal solution on an open interval, Extensions, maximal solutions, maximal intervals, and global solutions). Every such solution satisfies the Volterra equation (A first-order initial value problem is equivalent to its Volterra integral equation), and compact continuation extends a maximal solution whose graph stays in a compact subset of near a finite endpoint (Compact continuation for locally Lipschitz ODEs: a solution whose graph stays in a compact subset of the domain near a finite endpoint extends past it). [given]
Chain rule: for a totally differentiable curve on and a differentiable curve , the composite is differentiable with derivative (The chain rule for total derivatives: ). [given]
Integral inequalities: and monotonicity for real integrands (For and integrable when , ; for , is integrable, If on and both are integrable then ; and , The derivative and the Riemann integral of a vector-valued function: an intrinsic derivative and a componentwise integral); Gronwall: if continuous satisfies on with constants , then (apply the nondecreasing- clause of Gronwall's integral inequality with variable and constant coefficients with and ). [given]
Proof
By [F2] let be the unique maximal solution of with , where . Define , with if this set is empty, and . For one has , so the bounds of [F1] apply; also is totally differentiable near , as required by [F3].
Estimate on . Put and . Since , . By [F3] and , so for . Using [F1], because , and . Therefore, by [F4], and the Gronwall inequality of [F4] with , , gives for . Hence
No exit and continuation. If , continuity lets the estimate of step 2.1 pass to ; then a contradiction. Hence for every , step 2.1 and the hypothesis on give . If were finite, the graph of near would stay in the compact subset of , so compact continuation [F2] would extend past , contradicting maximality. Thus , and is defined on all of ; continuity extends the estimate of step 2.1 to the endpoint, proving the claim.
Adiabatic action drift bound: order- change of the action on the time scale
Statement
Let , , , let be open intervals, and let and be intervals with nonempty interiors (A one-frequency parameter-dependent action-angle branch, its transformed Hamiltonian and its drift generator, Intervals of : the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length). Let and be , with -periodic in on . Let and be compact intervals, let , and suppose
Let be a branch solution of the branch vector field of the datum (A one-frequency parameter-dependent action-angle branch, its transformed Hamiltonian and its drift generator) with , and suppose that for every one has and . Then for every ,
where is the drift generator of the datum.
Remarks
- Conditional character. The bound is conditional on the branch solution staying in the compact sets , i.e. on the action coordinate not leaving the chart along the motion; the trapping is an explicit hypothesis, not a consequence. The chart itself — the existence of a smooth parameter-dependent action-angle family with — is likewise a hypothesis of the definition, not proved here. No claim of exact invariance is made: the right-hand side is a bound of order and grows linearly in the rescaled time .
- Comparison with the sources. Both cited treatments derive the order- (averaged) statement ; Tong's Section 4.6 explicitly remarks that stricter proofs are deferred to the literature, and Likharev's averaged identity likewise treats the parameter as frozen over one period. The present theorem replaces averaging by the exact chain-rule identity and hence yields a uniform-in-time bound on the stated horizon under the explicit trapping and frequency hypotheses. No exact conservation is asserted.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The intervals , the compact intervals , the constants , the data with -periodic in , the drift generator , and a branch solution as in the statement.
The branch vector field is with ; consequently , and with ; see A one-frequency parameter-dependent action-angle branch, its transformed Hamiltonian and its drift generator. [given]
The angle average is of class on the open parameter domain , with and , by differentiation under the integral sign on compact rectangles (Leibniz's rule on a compact rectangle: an interior parameter derivative with a continuous extension may be passed through a Riemann integral). Since on , the quotient is on a neighborhood of ; in particular there, because does not depend on . [given]
The suprema in the statement are finite: and its first partial derivatives and the partial derivatives are continuous on the compact set (periodicity of and of its derivatives in makes a full period; If all partial derivatives exist on a neighbourhood and are continuous at a point, then the map is totally differentiable there with Jacobian derivative for the differentiable structure used below). [given]
Chain rule for a composite : if is totally differentiable at the relevant points and is differentiable, then (The chain rule for total derivatives: ). [given]
Fundamental theorem and norm bound: a differentiable curve on an interval with continuous derivative satisfies (If is differentiable with integrable then ; and a bounded derivative makes Lipschitz, The derivative and the Riemann integral of a vector-valued function: an intrinsic derivative and a componentwise integral), and for real continuous (For and integrable when , ; for , is integrable for the one-dimensional case, or monotonicity of the integral). [given]
Proof
Along the branch solution the composite is differentiable, and by [F1], [F2], [F4], Since by [F2], this gives , hence that is, at every .
Integrating: by [F5] applied to the curve , whose derivative is continuous by step 1.1 and [F3], so by [F3] and the norm bound of [F5], , where and .
Conclusion: writing and using the triangle inequality, which is the displayed bound.
Scope and limits of the oscillator, linearization, averaging and adiabatic items on this page
Scope of the approximation items
Every item on this page is mathematics: parameters, forcing functions, initial data and error constants are mathematical objects, and none of the statements asserts a physical law, a unit convention or an empirical fact. The following limits are part of the claims and must be carried by any consumer.
-
Linear oscillator results are exact for the stated model only. The homogeneous damped oscillator: solution classification by the discriminant and uniqueness for initial data and The degenerate and repulsive oscillator: solutions for k=0 and the explicit growing solution for k<0 classify all solutions of the constant-coefficient model with the stated parameter ranges (, resp. ) and are exact equivalences, including the free zero mode when and the exponential growth when . Strictly damped homogeneous oscillator with : every solution tends to zero needs and ; for no decay is claimed. The forced oscillator with : unique global solution and the convolution (Green's function) formula gives the exact convolution representation for continuous forcing and ; the kernel formula is a formula for that model, not a physical superposition principle. Sinusoidal forcing: the steady response, its amplitude and phase, and resonance at separates the steady response from the homogeneous transient; the resonant clause supplies an exact solution of the undamped resonant model, unbounded when and identically zero when , and The amplitude of the sinusoidally forced damped oscillator: location and value of its maximum locates the unique maximum of the response amplitude for and (for and the non-resonant amplitude is unbounded near ; for it is zero wherever its formula is defined). Forced quadratic system : decoupled forced modes and the convolution solution is exact for constant coefficient matrices and continuous forcing; it asserts nothing about nonlinear systems or configuration-dependent .
-
Finite-time linearization is not a stability statement. Finite-time linearization error bound: quadratic remainder, exponential growth bound and the variation-of-constants estimate is conditional on the explicit smallness condition and on a quadratic remainder bound on the ball, and concludes only on the finite horizon . It neither asserts long-time agreement of the nonlinear and linear evolutions nor Lyapunov stability of the origin. For a mechanical system with a configuration-dependent kinetic metric, the remainder hypothesis must be verified for the full first-order field (derivatives of and included), not for the potential alone.
-
Averaging compares two different models. Averaging for fast periodic oscillations: order- agreement on the time scale compares the solutions of and and gives agreement of order on the horizon under the trapping condition . The averaged equation is not equivalent to the oscillatory one; a longer horizon requires the trapping and smallness hypotheses to be checked again, and the theorem says nothing about stability or about invariant sets of the exact flow.
-
Adiabatic bounds need the chart, the frequency gap and the trapping. Adiabatic action drift bound: order- change of the action on the time scale is conditional on a parameter-dependent action-angle datum with on the stated compact sets and on the branch solution staying in them. The existence of such a family for a given mechanical model, uniform in the parameter, is a separate hypothesis; resonances (), separatrix crossings and action values leaving the chart are excluded, and the conclusion is a bound of order on a finite rescaled-time horizon, not exact conservation of the action.
-
Downstream use. Physical pages that read these results must adopt their own postulates and interpretations for masses, forces, damping, driving and adiabatic parameter variation, and must re-state the empirical qualifications of any measured input; none of the mathematics above supplies such interpretations.
5 · Examples, experiments and counterexamples
None yet.
Sources
- K. Likharev, Essential Graduate Physics, Classical Mechanics (complete 252-page volume), Chapter 5 Section 5.1, Eqs. (5.1)-(5.13a): harmonic oscillator, linear drag force, damping coefficient and the forced equation $m\ddot q+\eta\dot q+\kappa q=F(t)$; printed pages 1-3 of Chapter 5 (PDF pages 87-89)
- I. Stewart, Advanced Classical Mechanics (MIT 8.09 Fall 2014, complete course text), Chapter 7 Section 7.1.3, Eq. (7.15): the linearised forced damped oscillator and the underdamped, critically damped and overdamped solution cases, printed pages 147-148
- K. Likharev, Essential Graduate Physics, Classical Mechanics (complete 252-page volume), Chapter 5 Section 5.3, Eqs. (5.52)-(5.57): harmonic balance and the reduced (RWA) equations obtained by time averaging over one period, printed pages 12-14 of Chapter 5 (PDF pages 99-101)
- I. Stewart, Advanced Classical Mechanics (MIT 8.09 Fall 2014, complete course text), Chapter 5 Sections 5.2-5.3, Eqs. (5.25)-(5.28): averaging the first-order perturbation over one period and the secular change of the averaged variable, printed pages 95-98
- D. Tong, Classical Dynamics (Cambridge lecture notes, January 2015 version), Section 4.6, Eqs. (4.149)-(4.158): the action $I=\frac1{2\pi}\oint p\,dq$ of a one-dimensional family with slow parameter $\lambda(t)$ and the averaged statement $\langle\dot I\rangle=0$, printed pages 113-115
- K. Likharev, Essential Graduate Physics, Classical Mechanics (complete 252-page volume), Chapter 10 Sections 10.2-10.3, Eqs. (10.28)-(10.42): action variable $J=\frac1{2\pi}\oint p\,dq$, the averaged energy-change identity and the adiabatic-invariance conclusion $J=\text{const}$, printed pages 5-8 of Chapter 10 (PDF pages 241-244)
- G. Teschl, Ordinary Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems (retrieved 365-page online edition), Section 3.1, printed pp. 59-61 (matrix action and exponential), and Section 3.4, Theorem 3.12, printed pp. 83-84 (variation of constants). The convolution derivative is proved locally.
- J. Lebl, Basic Analysis I, Section 8.4 (the second fundamental theorem of calculus and differentiation of parameter integrals), online text
- K. Likharev, Essential Graduate Physics, Classical Mechanics (complete 252-page volume), Chapter 5 Section 5.1, Eqs. (5.6)-(5.12): characteristic equation $\lambda^2+2\delta\lambda+\omega_0^2=0$, its roots (5.8) and the free solution (5.9); printed pages 2-3 of Chapter 5 (PDF pages 88-89)
- I. Stewart, Advanced Classical Mechanics (MIT 8.09 Fall 2014, complete course text), Chapter 7 Section 7.1.3, Eq. (7.16): underdamped, critically damped and overdamped solution cases of the linearised oscillator, printed page 148
- G. Teschl, Ordinary Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems (retrieved 365-page online edition), Section 3.1, printed pp. 59-61 (matrix exponential). The three scalar families and their exhaustiveness are verified locally from the declared mathematical suppliers.
- K. Likharev, Essential Graduate Physics, Classical Mechanics (complete 252-page volume), Chapter 5 Section 5.1, Eqs. (5.6)-(5.9): characteristic equation and the free damped solutions, including the high-damping and free cases, printed pages 2-3 of Chapter 5 (PDF pages 88-89)
- I. Stewart, Advanced Classical Mechanics (MIT 8.09 Fall 2014, complete course text), Chapter 7 Section 7.1.3, Eq. (7.16) and the surrounding classification of linearised oscillator solutions, printed page 148
- G. Teschl, Ordinary Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems (retrieved 365-page online edition), Section 3.1, Eqs. (3.2)-(3.12), printed pp. 59-61; Section 3.4, Theorem 3.12, Eq. (3.97), printed pp. 83-84.
- K. Likharev, Essential Graduate Physics, Classical Mechanics (complete 252-page volume), Chapter 5 Section 5.1, Eqs. (5.27)-(5.30): the temporal Green's function as the response to a short pulse, $q(t)=\int f(t')G(t-t')\,dt'$, printed pages 6-7 of Chapter 5 (PDF pages 92-93)
- K. Likharev, Essential Graduate Physics, Classical Mechanics (complete 252-page volume), Chapter 5 Section 5.1, Eqs. (5.9)-(5.12): exponential decay of the free damped oscillations with time constant $\tau=1/\delta$ and the quality factor, printed pages 2-3 of Chapter 5 (PDF pages 88-89)
- I. Stewart, Advanced Classical Mechanics (MIT 8.09 Fall 2014, complete course text), Chapter 7 Section 7.1.3, Eq. (7.16): the transient term of the linearised oscillator decays away exponentially, printed page 148
- K. Likharev, Essential Graduate Physics, Classical Mechanics (complete 252-page volume), Chapter 5 Section 5.1, Eqs. (5.13)-(5.18) and (5.27)-(5.30): the forced equation, the response function and the temporal Green's function $q(t)=\int f(t')G(t-t')\,dt'$, printed pages 3-7 of Chapter 5 (PDF pages 89-93)
- G. Teschl, Ordinary Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems (retrieved 365-page online edition), Section 3.4, Theorem 3.12 and Eqs. (3.92)-(3.97), printed pp. 83-84 (continuous inhomogeneous linear forcing).
- G. Teschl, Ordinary Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems (retrieved 365-page online edition), Section 8.4, Eqs. (8.77)-(8.80), printed pp. 245-246 (quadratic harmonic model and modal transformation); Section 3.4, Theorem 3.12, printed pp. 83-84 (inhomogeneous linear response). The present mass convention and forced mode formulas are checked locally.
- D. Tong, Classical Dynamics (Cambridge lecture notes, January 2015 version), Section 2.6 (normal modes and their equations), printed pages 40-45
- K. Likharev, Essential Graduate Physics, Classical Mechanics (complete 252-page volume), Chapter 5 Section 5.1, Eqs. (5.14)-(5.22): the response function, the forced amplitude (5.18), the resonance value (5.19) and the resonance discussion, printed pages 3-5 of Chapter 5 (PDF pages 89-91)
- I. Stewart, Advanced Classical Mechanics (MIT 8.09 Fall 2014, complete course text), Chapter 7 Section 7.1.3, Eqs. (7.15)-(7.16): transient plus steady state forced motion with resonant behaviour at drive frequency equal to the natural frequency, printed pages 147-148
- K. Likharev, Essential Graduate Physics, Classical Mechanics (complete 252-page volume), Chapter 5 Section 5.1, Eqs. (5.18)-(5.22) and Fig. 5.1: the forced amplitude and the resonance peak, printed pages 4-5 of Chapter 5 (PDF pages 90-91)
- I. Stewart, Advanced Classical Mechanics (MIT 8.09 Fall 2014, complete course text), Chapter 7 Section 7.1.3: 'the steady state forced motion (whose amplitude exhibits resonant behavior at omega_D = 1)', printed page 148
- K. Likharev, Essential Graduate Physics, Classical Mechanics (complete 252-page volume), Chapter 5 Section 5.3, Eqs. (5.52)-(5.57): time averaging over one period and the reduced equations, with the first-order-order-of-magnitude bookkeeping, printed pages 12-14 of Chapter 5 (PDF pages 99-101)
- I. Stewart, Advanced Classical Mechanics (MIT 8.09 Fall 2014, complete course text), Chapter 5 Sections 5.2-5.3, Eqs. (5.25)-(5.28): average over one period and size of the oscillatory versus secular parts, printed pages 95-98
- G. Teschl, Ordinary Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems (retrieved 365-page online edition), Section 2.4, Theorem 2.10, printed pp. 45-48 (smooth dependence and variational equation); Section 3.4, Theorem 3.12, printed pp. 83-84 (variation of constants). The explicit quadratic error estimate is derived locally.
- I. Stewart, Advanced Classical Mechanics (MIT 8.09 Fall 2014, complete course text), Chapter 7 Section 7.1.3: the linearised version of the damped oscillator and the limits of linear reasoning, printed pages 147-148
- K. Likharev, Essential Graduate Physics, Classical Mechanics (complete 252-page volume), Chapter 5 Section 5.3, Eqs. (5.52)-(5.57): the reduced (averaged) equations for a weakly perturbed oscillator, obtained to first order in the small parameter, printed pages 12-14 of Chapter 5 (PDF pages 99-101)
- I. Stewart, Advanced Classical Mechanics (MIT 8.09 Fall 2014, complete course text), Chapter 5 Sections 5.2-5.3, Eqs. (5.22)-(5.28): splitting a perturbation into periodic and secular parts and averaging over one period, printed pages 96-98
- K. Likharev, Essential Graduate Physics, Classical Mechanics (complete 252-page volume), Chapter 10 Sections 10.2-10.3, Eqs. (10.28)-(10.42): the adiabatic regime, the averaged energy-change identity and the invariance of the action variable to the accuracy of the averaged argument, printed pages 5-8 of Chapter 10 (PDF pages 241-244)
- D. Tong, Classical Dynamics (Cambridge lecture notes, January 2015 version), Section 4.6, Eqs. (4.148)-(4.158): the averaged statement $\langle\dot I\rangle=0$ for a slowly varying parameter, with the author's explicit note that more rigorous proofs exist elsewhere, printed pages 113-115
- I. Stewart, Advanced Classical Mechanics (MIT 8.09 Fall 2014, complete course text), Chapter 5 Sections 5.2-5.3, Eqs. (5.23)-(5.28): secular versus periodic first-order effects after averaging over one period, printed pages 96-98
- K. Likharev, Essential Graduate Physics, Classical Mechanics (complete 252-page volume), Chapter 5 Sections 5.1 and 5.3 and Chapter 10 Sections 10.2-10.3: the perturbative and averaged character of the oscillator, reduced-equation and adiabatic discussion
- D. Tong, Classical Dynamics (Cambridge lecture notes, January 2015 version), Section 4.6: the author's explicit remark that the intuitive adiabatic argument is approximate and that stricter proofs exist elsewhere