Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The amplitude of the sinusoidally forced damped oscillator: location and value of its maximum

Statement

Let m>0, k>0, c>0 and f0≠0. For Ω≥0 let

A(Ω):=∣f0∣(k−mΩ2)2+c2Ω2

be the amplitude about zero of the steady response of Sinusoidal forcing: the steady response, its amplitude and phase, and resonance at Ω=k/m clause 1, and put

u∗:=km−c22m2,Ω∗:=u∗  when u∗>0.

Then:

  1. If u∗>0 (equivalently c2<2mk), A is strictly increasing on [0,Ω∗], strictly decreasing on [Ω∗,∞), and its maximum on [0,∞) is attained at Ω∗ and at no other point, with A(Ω∗)=2m∣f0∣c4mk−c2.
  2. If u∗≤0 then A is strictly decreasing on [0,∞) and its maximum on [0,∞) is attained at Ω=0 and at no other point.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The parameters m>0, k>0, c>0, f0≠0, the amplitude function A of the statement and the number u∗.

[F1]

For every Ω≥0 the denominator (k−mΩ2)2+c2Ω2 is strictly positive, and A(Ω)=∣f0∣/q(Ω2) with q(u):=(k−mu)2+c2u; this is the amplitude computed in Sinusoidal forcing: the steady response, its amplitude and phase, and resonance at Ω=k/m clause 1. [given]

[F2]

Derivatives: for a differentiable F with F′>0 on an interval, F is strictly increasing there, and with F′<0 strictly decreasing, by the mean value theorem (The mean value theorem, as the case g(x)=x of Cauchy's: for f continuous on [a,b] with a<b and differentiable on (a,b) there is c∈(a,b) with f(b)−f(a)=f′(c)(b−a)); polynomials are differentiated by the algebra of derivatives and the power rule, and composites by the chain rule. [thm-algebra-of-derivatives, lem-derivative-of-a-power, thm-chain-rule, def-interval]

[F3]

For 0<a<b one has 0<b−1<a−1 and 0<a<b, and x↦x is strictly increasing on [0,∞) (Inverses of positives are positive, and reciprocation reverses order, Squaring is monotone on the nonnegatives, with nonnegative roots supplied by Square roots exist: a unique a≥0 with (a)2=a; the positives are {x2:x≠0}). [def-interval]

Proof

technique · cases on the sign of the minimiser; compute the quadratic exactly, locate its vertex, and convert the monotonicity through the strictly increasing square-root map followed by the strictly decreasing reciprocal map on positive arguments
1.1givenalgebra

Write q(u)=(k−mu)2+c2u=m2u2+(c2−2mk)u+k2 and u∗=km−c22m2. [assume-case 1, assume-case 2] Expanding m2(u−u∗)2 and using −2m2u∗=c2−2mk gives q(u)=m2(u−u∗)2+(k2−m2u∗2),q′(u)=2m2(u−u∗), and the constant is (k2−m2u∗2)=(k−mu∗)(k+mu∗)=c22m⋅4mk−c22m=c2(4mk−c2)4m2, because k−mu∗=c22m and k+mu∗=4mk−c22m; in particular q is a quadratic with positive leading coefficient and unique global minimiser u∗ and q(u∗)=c2(4mk−c2)4m2. Also u∗>0 if and only if c2<2mk; in this branch 4mk−c2>0, so q(u∗)>0. For every u≥0, q(u)=(k−mu)2+c2u>0: at u=0 it equals k2>0, and at u>0 the second summand is positive.

2.1step 1.1F2

Monotonicity of Ω↦q(Ω2): by [F2], its derivative is 2Ω q′(Ω2)=4m2Ω(Ω2−u∗). Hence if u∗>0 this derivative is negative on (0,Ω∗) and positive on (Ω∗,∞), so q(Ω2) is strictly decreasing on [0,Ω∗] and strictly increasing on [Ω∗,∞) (strictness on the closed intervals follows from [F2] on every subinterval and continuity); if u∗≤0 the derivative is positive on (0,∞), so q(Ω2) is strictly increasing on [0,∞).

3.1step 2.1F1F3algebra∎

Conclusion. [cases-exhaustive: u∗>0; u∗≤0] If u∗>0, then on [0,Ω∗] the value q(Ω2) strictly decreases to q(Ω∗2)=q(u∗) and on [Ω∗,∞) it strictly increases from q(u∗); since x↦1/x is strictly decreasing on (0,∞) and x↦x strictly increasing on [0,∞) by [F3], A=∣f0∣/q(Ω2) is strictly increasing on [0,Ω∗] and strictly decreasing on [Ω∗,∞), so its maximum is attained exactly at Ω∗, with A(Ω∗)=∣f0∣/q(u∗)=2m∣f0∣c4mk−c2. If u∗≤0, then q(Ω2) is strictly increasing on [0,∞), so A is strictly decreasing there and its maximum is attained exactly at Ω=0.

Remarks

  • The undamped case. For c=0 the same computation gives q(u)=(k−mu)2, whose zero is u=k/m, i.e. Ω=ω0=k/m; there the denominator of the steady-response formula vanishes and A (the modulus of the response function) is unbounded above in every neighbourhood of ω0 meeting [0,∞)∖{ω0}. Hence for c=0 the amplitude has no maximum on [0,∞); it is strictly increasing on [0,ω0), which is the increasing branch that persists in the c>0 case above. This matches the resonant case of Sinusoidal forcing: the steady response, its amplitude and phase, and resonance at Ω=k/m clause 2, where the response has absolute values tending to infinity along the quarter-turn sequence when f0≠0.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources