How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Completed local mode Lie algebra of a conformal vertex algebra
Definition
Let be a conformal vertex algebra of CFT type and set . For a formal parameter , let be the space of Laurent series with one finite lower bound and coefficients in the finite-dimensional space . Put . A local one-form is represented by . Quotient by the covariant-derivative relations where . The resulting space is .
On representatives set For series representatives and , choose finite bases of their finite-dimensional coefficient spaces. Field truncation gives a common with for all basis pairs when . In the coefficient of any fixed power , terms satisfy with , , and ; there are finitely many such triples, so the bracket coefficient is a finite sum. Its state coefficients lie in the finite span of the finitely many basis-pair products with . The previously established full local chiral Jacobi identity makes this quotient a Lie algebra. Here a -module has the vacuum and full module Jacobi axioms of the earlier ordinary vertex-algebra module definition: is a complex vector space and is linear in . Its lower truncation means that for every and there is an integer such that for all . No conformal grading of is required here. On such a module, the residue action is For a fixed module vector this sum is finite: the states lie in a finite-dimensional , so lower truncation is uniform on a basis of their coefficient space. The Lie representation and independence of representatives are proved in the representation lemma below.