Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-22
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Complex projective bundle and tautological complex line

Definition

Assume AC. Let E→B be a numerable complex vector bundle of rank n≥1 over a paracompact Hausdorff CW complex B, with zero section 0B and total space E. Its projective bundle is the quotient P(E):=(E∖0B(B))/C×, where λ∈C× acts fiberwise by v↦λv; write [ℓ] for the class of a nonzero vector. The projection p:P(E)→B, p([v])=π(v), is well defined because scaling preserves the base point.

P(E) is a fiber bundle over B with fiber CPn−1: over a complex linear chart U×Cn of E the quotient is U×CPn−1. On an overlap, the transition matrix gUV(b)∈GL⁡n(C) induces (b,[v])↦(b,[gUV(b)v]); this is a homeomorphism with inverse induced by gVU, depends continuously on b, and the cocycle identities descend unchanged to projective classes. These quotient charts therefore form a fiber-bundle atlas with fiber CPn−1. Under the identification CPn−1=Gr⁡1(Cn) supplied by Stiefel spaces, Grassmannians, and tautological bundles, a point of the fiber over b∈B is a complex line ℓ⊆Eb.

The tautological complex line γE⊆p∗E is the subbundle whose fiber over ℓ⊆Eb is ℓ itself, with the complex structure induced from E; its transition functions are the projectivized linear maps restricted to the selected line, so it is a complex line bundle over P(E).

Here is the base and orientation justification needed to define its Euler class. The numeration for E also numerates the displayed projective charts. The CW complex B is CGWH. The fiber CPn−1 is compact Hausdorff and a finite CW complex (with one cell in dimensions 0,2,…,2n−2). Thus Compact-fibre bundle totals preserve paracompactness, and CW type under CW-type hypotheses applies and makes P(E) paracompact Hausdorff, CGWH, and of CW type. The tautological line is locally trivial: in a projective coordinate chart vj≠0, choose the unique representative with vj=1 and write each vector on the line as its scalar multiple. These charts, combined with the charts of E, give linear trivializations. Under AC (hence DC), Under choice and dependent choice, every open cover of a paracompact Hausdorff space admits a locally finite subordinate partition of unity numerates their open cover.

Orient the underlying real line bundle by the frame (v,iv) in each such complex trivialization. Changing v to (a+ib)v has real matrix (a−bba), of determinant a2+b2>0. Hence these orientations agree on overlaps by Oriented real bundles and oriented frame bundles. This direct rank-one construction uses no CW structure on P(E) itself. The resulting numerable oriented real rank-two bundle is in the general Thom scope, so Euler class by zero-section pullback of the Thom class defines x=xE:=e((γE)R)∈H2(P(E);Z). Defining x by the Euler class of the tautological line avoids any circular use of Chern classes, which are introduced only afterwards on this page. For the zero bundle of rank 0 we set P(0B):=∅, and x is not defined there; for a line bundle L the map P(L)→B is a homeomorphism over B and γL corresponds to L under it.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources