Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Continuous differential-form integrals over smooth singular chains in Euclidean domains

Physical scope

Pure mathematics; no physical premises or physical claim.

Definition

Let V⊆Rn be open, let 1≤k≤n, let ω be a continuous k-form on V, and let σ:Δk→V be a smooth singular simplex. Here a continuous k-form is a field of alternating covariant k-tensors with continuous coordinate coefficient functions; for smooth forms this is the usual type of A smooth differential k-form. No injectivity or immersion is required. Extend pullback to this regularity by the slot formula

(σ∗ω)u(v1,…,vk):=ωσ(u)(Dσuv1,…,Dσuvk).

In the fixed positive affine coordinates u1,…,uk on its standard parameter simplex, write the resulting continuous pullback as σ∗ω=gσ(u) du1∧⋯∧duk. Define

∫σω:=∫Δkgσ(u) du.

For a finite real smooth singular k-chain c=∑σaσσ, define ∫cω:=∑σaσ∫σω. The orientation is the fixed standard affine orientation; reversing a chain coefficient reverses its contribution. This definition applies to every continuous form, including forms with continuous first derivatives and their continuous exterior derivatives; C1 means Continuously differentiable maps, local inverses, and local diffeomorphisms. For smooth ω, this is the same affine pullback integral used in Integral of a form over a smooth singular simplex.

Each standard parameter simplex is compact Jordan, so every integral in the Definition exists; this is verified below.

Definition references

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An open V⊆Rn, an integer 1≤k≤n, a continuous k-form ω on V, and a finite real smooth singular k-chain in V.

[F1]

Smooth singular simplex defines σ by a smooth extension to an open neighbourhood of the compact standard simplex, so its coordinate functions and first derivatives are continuous on Δk.

[F2]

The pullback of a differential form and The pullback of a covariant tensor field use the displayed slot formula in the smooth setting, and A smooth differential k-form fixes the alternating-tensor type; here the formula extends pointwise to continuous coefficients. Its coordinate coefficient is a finite sum of products of form coefficients composed with σ and first partial derivatives of σ.

[F3]

Continuity of a map of topological spaces at a point and globally defines continuity by neighbourhood preimages, and Topological spaces and continuous maps form the large locally small category Top says composites of continuous maps are continuous.

[F4]

The standard topological simplex and its affine face maps defines the standard simplex by barycentric coordinates ti≥0, ∑i=0kti=1. Standard orientation of the affine simplex identifies its positive affine coordinates with ui≥0, ∑i=1kui≤1, and fixes the signed faces.

[F6]

The graph of a continuous function on a compact Euclidean set has content zero makes the graph of a continuous face function over a compact coordinate projection content zero.

[F7]

Measure zero and content zero in Rm by countable and finite cube covers defines content zero by finite cube covers; Laws of finite sums and finite products lets finitely many such covers combine with summed volume at most the sum of their bounds. A bounded set in Rm is Jordan measurable iff its boundary is null, equivalently of content zero characterizes a bounded Jordan set by its content-zero boundary.

[F8]

Standard orientation of the affine simplex fixes the positive affine parameter coordinates and signed faces.

[F10]

Smooth singular chain and cochain complexes defines finite real chains as finitely supported coefficients on smooth simplex maps; Finite sums and finite products, by recursion fixes the empty-sum value. Linearity, monotonicity, the absolute-value estimate and coordinate-slice additivity for the Riemann integral in Rm gives linearity of the Riemann integral.

[F11]

Integral of a form over a smooth singular simplex uses the same pullback coefficient and fixed positive affine parameter coordinates when the form is smooth.

[F12]

Continuously differentiable maps, local inverses, and local diffeomorphisms defines C1 on Euclidean open sets by total differentiability with continuous first derivative.

Proof

Given: The data in the Definition, with the parameter orientation fixed by [F4].

1.1F1F2F3F4given

In coordinates, each pullback coefficient is the finite sum of products described in [F2]. Every form coefficient composed with σ is continuous by [F1] and [F3], and each derivative of σ is continuous by [F1]. Finite sums of continuous real functions are continuous by the triangle inequality. For a product fg at a point u0, first restrict to a neighbourhood where ∣g(u)−g(u0)∣<1, so ∣g(u)∣≤∣g(u0)∣+1, then use ∣f(u)g(u)−f(u0)g(u0)∣≤∣f(u)−f(u0)∣(∣g(u0)∣+1)+∣f(u0)∣∣g(u)−g(u0)∣. Continuity of f and g makes the right side arbitrarily small. Induction proves continuity for every finite product, hence gσ is continuous on Δk. If two smooth extensions of σ are chosen, they agree as functions on the relative interior of Δk, which is open in its affine span; hence their tangential derivatives and pullback coefficients agree there. For any boundary point u, the points us=(1−s)u+sb, where b=(1/(k+1),…,1/(k+1)) and 0<s≤1, have all coordinates positive and coordinate sum below 1, so they lie in the relative interior and converge to u. Continuity of both coefficient functions makes them equal at u too. Thus gσ is independent of the extension. No immersion is needed; when Dσu has rank below k, alternation makes the pullback coefficient zero at u.

1.2F4F5F6F7given

The set Δk in [F4] is closed and bounded, hence compact by [F5]. Its boundary consists of its coordinate faces ui=0 and its upper face ∑iui=1. If k=1, these are the two endpoints 0,1, covered by two intervals of arbitrarily small total length, so the boundary has content zero by [F7]. If k≥2, each coordinate face is the graph of the constant zero function over its closed bounded coordinate projection, and the upper face is the graph of uk=1−∑i<kui over the closed bounded simplex {ui≥0,∑i<kui≤1}. These bases are compact by [F5]. The upper-face function is continuous because ∣∑i<k(ui−vi)∣≤(k−1)∥u−v∥2, and the lower-face functions are constant; [F6] therefore makes each face content zero. Given ε>0, cover each of the finitely many faces by a finite cube family with total volume less than ε/(k+1); their union is a finite cover of the boundary with total volume less than ε by [F7]. Thus ∂Δk has content zero, and [F7] makes the bounded set Δk Jordan measurable.

2.1F9step 1.1step 1.2

By [F9], the continuous coefficient gσ is Riemann integrable on the compact Jordan simplex from step 1.2, so each simplex integral in the Definition is finite.

3.1F8F10F11F12step 2.1∎

A finite chain has finitely many nonzero coefficients by [F10]. Its integral is therefore a finite sum of finite real numbers; the zero chain has the empty sum, equal to 0 by [F10]. If a chain is presented with repeated copies of the same simplex, [F10] and linearity combine their coefficients without changing the result. The positive affine parameter orientation is fixed by [F8]. The Definition covers C1 coefficient forms and the continuous coefficients of their first exterior derivatives by [F12]. For smooth ω, the coefficient and affine parameter integral are exactly those in [F11], so the two integral conventions agree.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources