Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Killing-multiplier current and its observer density

Physical scope

Pure mathematical contraction convention; it asserts no conservation, positivity, matter realization, or empirical result.

Definition

Assume ACω for the tangent-bundle smooth structure of the Lorentzian conventions.

Let (M,g,N) be a smooth time-oriented Lorentzian four-manifold, let U⊆M be open, let Sab be a smooth symmetric covariant 2-tensor field on U, and let X be a smooth Killing field on U. For Xb:=gbcXc and Sab:=gacgbdScd, define the Killing-multiplier current by

jXa:=−SabXb.

At a point p∈U and for an observer n∈TpM with gp(n,n)=−1 and n future-directed, define the associated Killing-multiplier density by

ρX(p;n):=−gp(n,jX)=Sab(p)naXb.

The current and density are defined for every such S,X,n. The definition imposes no conservation equation, sign condition, or coercivity property.

Remarks

The definition makes no conservation, positivity, or coercivity claim for jX or ρX.

The smooth tangent-bundle convention assumes only countable choice ACω; no stronger choice principle is used.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources