Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Quasilocal completion of finite matrix registers

Definition

Fix q≥1 and the ordered registers VN=(Cq)⊗N, with V0=C. Here End⁡(VN) is the space of linear maps VN→VN as in Linear map between vector spaces over the same field. For such a map define its operator norm by ∥A∥:=sup⁡∥x∥=1∥Ax∥, using the ordered tensor inner product of Ordered tensor registers, their inner product, and wire permutations. In its ordered orthonormal product basis define the adjoint by (A∗)ij=Aji‾. For the linear-first inner product this gives ⟨Ax,y⟩=⟨x,A∗y⟩ for all x,y∈VN. Embed AN=End⁡(VN) into AN+1 by ιN(A)=A⊗Iq. Write a vector in VN⊗Cq as x=∑j=1qxj⊗∣j⟩. Then ∥(A⊗Iq)x∥2=∑j=1q∥Axj∥2≤∥A∥2∑j=1q∥xj∥2=∥A∥2∥x∥2. Testing on unit simple tensors v⊗∣1⟩ and taking the supremum over unit v gives the reverse norm inequality, hence ∥A⊗Iq∥=∥A∥. The embeddings are isometric unital *-homomorphisms. For m≥N, define ιN,m(A)=A⊗Iq⊗(m−N) and identify A∈AN with its image at every larger register. For a two-step inclusion the maps fit into this commutative diagram:

ANAN+1AN+2NN;N+2N+1

The curved arrow tensors with two identities, and the upper path tensors with one identity twice; both send A to A⊗Iq⊗Iq. Let Aloc=⋃N≥0AN with the induced norm, product and adjoint. Define A=Aloc‾ in this norm. This is the quasilocal matrix algebra for the one-dimensional ordered register chain; it is a unital C*-algebra with unit the common image of 1∈A0.

The sequence (AN,ιN) is the specified inductive system. This definition concerns one fixed local matrix size q and makes no claim about a physical lattice geometry or dynamics.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: q≥1, the ordered finite tensor registers, and their finite operator norms.

[F1]

Ordered tensor registers, their inner product, and wire permutations: the ordered product basis spans each finite tensor register and its inner product is the product inner product.

[F2]

C star algebra: a C*-algebra is a complete normed -algebra satisfying the C-identity.

[F3]

Finite Hermitian diagonalization: every finite Hermitian matrix has an orthonormal eigenbasis with real eigenvalues.

[F4]

Cauchy–Schwarz: ∣⟨x,y⟩∣≤∥x∥ ∥y∥, with equality exactly for dependent pairs: the inner-product pairing obeys ∣⟨u,v⟩∣≤∥u∥∥v∥.

Proof

1.1givenF1algebra

The decomposition x=∑jxj⊗∣j⟩ is orthogonal in the product basis [F1], and A⊗Iq sends each summand to Axj⊗∣j⟩. The displayed sum-of-squares formula follows. It proves ∥A⊗Iq∥≤∥A∥. For every unit v, ∥(A⊗Iq)(v⊗∣1⟩)∥=∥Av∥; taking the supremum over unit v proves the opposite inequality. Thus ιN is isometric.

2.1givenF1F2F3F4step 1.1algebra∎

The conjugate-transpose formula gives (αA+βB)∗=α‾A∗+β‾B∗, (A∗)∗=A and (AB)∗=B∗A∗ by conjugating and reversing the finite coordinate sums for matrix multiplication. For A∈AN, the finite Hermitian matrix A∗A is nonnegative, since x∗A∗Ax=∥Ax∥2≥0. By [F3] its eigenvalues are nonnegative, and in an orthonormal eigenbasis ∥A∥2=sup⁡∥x∥=1x∗A∗Ax=max⁡spec⁡(A∗A)=∥A∗A∥. Indeed, if its eigenvalues are λi≥0, then x∗A∗Ax=∑iλi∣xi∣2 and ∥A∗Ax∥2=∑iλi2∣xi∣2. The unit-vector suprema are max⁡iλi and (max⁡iλi)2, respectively. Thus every local matrix algebra satisfies the C*-identity. Tensor multiplication and adjoint give (A⊗I)(B⊗I)=(AB)⊗I and (A⊗I)∗=A∗⊗I, while I⊗I is the unit. Hence these maps are unital -homomorphisms, and their compatible inclusions make the union operations well-defined. Operator-norm submultiplicativity follows from ∥ABx∥≤∥A∥∥B∥∥x∥. By [F4], ∥z∥=sup⁡∥x∥=1∣⟨z,x⟩∣, with equality at x=z/∥z∥ when z≠0. The adjoint identity gives ∥A∗y∥=sup⁡∥x∥=1∣⟨y,Ax⟩∣≤∥A∥∥y∥; applying this to A∗ proves ∥A∗∥=∥A∥. Hence the union is a normed -algebra satisfying the C-identity. The norm completion preserves product, involution and that identity by continuity, and is complete by construction. By [F2] it is a C-algebra.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources