Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck pendingjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The One-Box Fixed Point for U(1)

Example

Assume full AC. Let V=W=C, let ζ>0, and let T=(S1)2×S1 have rotation characters t1,t2 and a framing-circle factor acting on W in its defining representation. Write h∈U(W)=S1 for a framing element; its character on W is e1−1, and e1 is the dual character. The action on ADHM data is (t1,t2,h)⋅(B1,B2,I,J)=(t1B1,t2B2,Ih−1,t1t2hJ). Put ϵi=c1T(ti) and a1=c1T(e1), and work over K=Q(ϵ1,ϵ2,a1) with algebraically independent generators. Let M1,1ζ be the quotient by GL(V) of data satisfying [B1,B2]+IJ=0 and span⁡{B1m1B2m2I(W):m1,m2≥0}=V, in the positive stability chamber, and let q be the formal variable in the theorem's fixed-point series.

The datum B1=B2=J=0, I=1 is stable and satisfies the complex moment-map equation. The full-AC fixed-point theorem classifies the fixed points by one-color partitions; at total size one the unique tuple is Y1={(0,0)}. Its tangent character is t1+t2, with additive tangent weights ϵ1,ϵ2. Define its tangent Euler product as the product of those additive weights, so EY1=ϵ1ϵ2. The theorem's formal series Z1fp(q) has degree-k coefficient ∑∣Y1∣=kEY1−1; hence the degree-one contribution is (ϵ1ϵ2)−1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Full AC, N=k=1, V=W=C, ζ>0, the stated ADHM equation, stability condition and exact T-action, and algebraically independent formal weights.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice: full AC is required by the theorem supplier’s stable-quotient and fixed-scheme arguments that yield the fixed-point and tangent results; this example’s finite character calculation uses no additional choices.

[F1]

ADHM linear data, stability, costability and FI levels: for N=1, the raw ADHM maps, equation, word stability, and dual-framing torus action have the conventions displayed in the Example.

[F2]

ADHM Fixed Points and the Equivariant Instanton Count: under full AC, the stable quotient is smooth, the fixed points are indexed by one-tuples of partitions, their tangent characters are computed from the ADHM deformation complex, and the formal series sums inverse tangent Euler products.

Verification

1.1givenF1algebra

The chosen datum has IJ=0, so the complex moment-map equation holds. Since I=1 maps W onto V, its image already spans V, so the datum is stable. The GL(V)=C× action removes the nonzero scalar choice of I; the quotient coordinates are B1,B2.

2.1givenA1F2step 1.1algebra

There is exactly one partition of k=1 for N=1, namely Y1={(0,0)}, so [F2] gives the unique fixed point. Here VY⃗=e1 and W=e1−1, whence V∨V=1, V∨W∨=1, and t1t2WV=t1t2. Substitution in the tangent character gives t1+t2; the two additive weights are ϵ1,ϵ2, so the Euler class is ϵ1ϵ2.

3.1givenA1F2step 2.1algebra∎

The degree-one coefficient is the sum over the single fixed point, so it equals (ϵ1ϵ2)−1. This is a formal equivariant fixed-point contribution, not an asserted continuum path-integral value.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels