Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The single-flip code at a=100: a nonperiodic coded orbit converging to the fixed point at both ends

Example

Take a=100 and let s∈X± be the code with

s0=−1,sn=+1 (n≠0),

the single-flip code. Then s is constant outside a finite set (indeed outside {0}), is not the constant code +1ˉ, and is not periodic: S±ms≠s for every m≥1, because the unique coordinate at which S±ms equals −1 is −m≠0 whereas s equals −1 only at 0. Consequently the coded point z:=h(s) satisfies z≠(r+,r+) and Fm(z)≠z for every m≥1, while

Fn(z)⟶(r+,r+)(n→+∞ and n→−∞).

Facts & Assumptions

[L1]

Finite-word data (Constant codes give the fixed points, and finite nonconstant word codes give homoclinic orbits converging to a fixed point at both ends): a code that equals the constant code uˉ outside a finite set has coded orbit converging to (ru,ru) at both ends, and h(s)≠(ru,ru) for s≠uˉ; distinct codes give distinct points.

[L2]

Conjugacy and injectivity (The quadratic map F(x,y)=(y,y2−a−x) has a compact coded invariant set conjugate to the two-sign shift, with chaos under ACω, Finite symbol windows determine the code: locality of the iterates, coding continuity and injectivity of h(σ)=(x−1(σ),x0(σ))): Fn(h(t))=h(S±nt) for all t and n, and h is injective; hence Fm(h(s))=h(s) would force S±ms=s, and h(s)=h(+1ˉ) would force s=+1ˉ.

[L3]

The constant code (Constant codes give the fixed points, and finite nonconstant word codes give homoclinic orbits converging to a fixed point at both ends, clause 1): h(+1ˉ)=(r+,r+) with r+=1+101.

Verification

technique · direct; combine the finite-word convergence with the injectivity of the coding to exclude periodicity
1.1givenalgebra

Nonperiodicity of the code: for m≥1, the coordinate 0 of S±ms equals sm=+1, while s0=−1; hence S±ms≠s. Also s≠+1ˉ because s0=−1.

2.1givenstep 1.1L2L4

The point differs from the fixed point: by [L4], x0(s)<0<r+, so h(s)≠(r+,r+) directly; alternatively this follows from the injectivity and s≠+1ˉ in [L1], [L2].

2.2step 1.1L2

No return to the initial point: if Fm(h(s))=h(s) for some m≥1, then h(S±ms)=h(s) by [L2], so S±ms=s by injectivity, contradicting step 1.1.

3.1step 2.1step 2.2L1L3∎

Two-sided convergence: the code s equals +1ˉ outside {0}, so [L1] applies with u=+1 and gives Fn(h(s))→(r+,r+) as n→±∞. Together with steps 2.1 and 2.2 this exhibits h(s) as a nonperiodic homoclinic point of the fixed point (r+,r+).

Remarks

  • The verification uses only the coding dictionary and the finite-word convergence; it does not compute the coordinates of h(s), which have no closed form.

  • The same argument applies to every nonconstant code that is constant outside a finite set: none of these coded orbits is periodic, and each converges to the corresponding fixed point in both time directions.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources