Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Constant codes give the fixed points, and finite nonconstant word codes give homoclinic orbits converging to a fixed point at both ends

Statement

Fix a≥100, let R=a+3, L=a−2R, let x(s) and h be the coded sequence and coding map of The two-sign bilateral shift space, its coding map, and the ball of bounded bilateral real sequences, The square-root recurrence Ts(x)n=sna+xn−1+xn+1 is a contraction of BR with a unique coded solution and Finite symbol windows determine the code: locality of the iterates, coding continuity and injectivity of h(σ)=(x−1(σ),x0(σ)), and let F(x,y)=(y,y2−a−x). For u∈{−1,+1} write uˉ∈X± for the constant code uˉn:=u, and put

ru:=1+ua+1,

so that r+>0>r−, and write Ws,Wu for the stable and unstable sets of Stable and unstable cones, invariant line slopes, stable and unstable sets, and transverse homoclinic points of the quadratic family. Then:

  1. xn(uˉ)=ru for every n, and ru2=a+2ru; consequently h(uˉ)=(ru,ru) is a fixed point of F;
  2. if s∈X± satisfies sn=u for all ∣n∣≥N for some N≥0, then

Fn(h(s))⟶(ru,ru)as n→+∞and as n→−∞;

  1. if moreover s is not the constant code uˉ, then h(s)≠(ru,ru), Fn(h(s))≠(ru,ru) for every n∈Z, and h(s)∈Ws(ru,ru)∩Wu(ru,ru); hence h(s) is a homoclinic point of the fixed point (ru,ru);
  2. distinct codes s≠t of the kind in clause 2 give distinct points h(s)≠h(t); in particular the finite-word deviations from the two constant codes produce infinitely many distinct homoclinic points.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The parameter a≥100, the constants R,L, the coded sequence x(s) and map h, the phase map F, the constant codes uˉ, the numbers ru, and a code s with sn=u for ∣n∣≥N.

[F1]

Coding data (The square-root recurrence Ts(x)n=sna+xn−1+xn+1 is a contraction of BR with a unique coded solution, Finite symbol windows determine the code: locality of the iterates, coding continuity and injectivity of h(σ)=(x−1(σ),x0(σ))): x(s)∈BR is the unique fixed point of Ts, sign⁡xn(s)=sn, ∣xn(s)∣≥L, xn+1(s)+xn−1(s)=xn(s)2−a; locality: (Tsm0)n depends only on sj with ∣j−n∣≤m−1; uniform error: ∥Tsm0−x(s)∥∞≤2RL−m; h is injective; F(xn−1(s),xn(s))=(xn(s),xn+1(s)).

[F2]

Conjugacy and invariant set (The quadratic map F(x,y)=(y,y2−a−x) has a compact coded invariant set conjugate to the two-sign shift, with chaos under ACω): F(h(s))=h(S±s) for all s, and the coded set is invariant.

[F3]

Square roots and the equation r2=a+2r (Square roots exist: a unique a≥0 with (a)2=a; the positives are {x2:x≠0}, Absolute value in an ordered field): a+2ru>0, a+2ru=∣ru∣ and ru=ua+2ru, because ru2=a+2ru and sign⁡ru=u.

[F4]

Stable and unstable sets (Stable and unstable cones, invariant line slopes, stable and unstable sets, and transverse homoclinic points of the quadratic family): Ws(zˉ)={z:Fn(z) defined for all n≥0, Fn(z)→zˉ}, Wu(zˉ)={z:F−n(z)→zˉ}, and a homoclinic point of a fixed point zˉ is a point of Ws(zˉ)∩Wu(zˉ) different from zˉ; convergence is metric convergence (Convergence of a sequence in a metric space: xk→x iff d(xk,x)→0 in R, Metric space: d(x,y)=0 iff x=y, symmetry, and the triangle inequality; pseudometric and ultrametric).

[F6]

Absolute value and the base arithmetic (Basic properties of the absolute value, Absolute value in an ordered field): ∣uv∣=∣u∣∣v∣, ∣u+w∣≤∣u∣+∣w∣, and 102=100.

[F7]

Squaring is strictly increasing on the nonnegative reals (Squaring is monotone on the nonnegatives): if 0≤x<y then x2<y2, and if 0≤x≤y then x2≤y2.

Proof

technique · direct; check the constant codes against the recurrence, use the locality of the finite windows for the two-sided convergence, and invoke injectivity of the coding for the distinctness of finite-word homoclinic points
1.1givenF3F6F7algebra

The constants ru: since a≥100, [F7] applied to 102≤a=(a)2 gives a≥10. Also (a+1)2=a+2a+1>a+1, so [F7] gives a+1<a+1; and 12<a+1 gives a+1>1. Thus a+2−2a+1>a−2a=a(a−2)>0, so a+2ru=a+2+2ua+1>0 for both signs. The number ru=1+ua+1 satisfies ru2=1+2ua+1+(a+1)=a+2+2ua+1=a+2ru, and sign⁡ru=u by a+1>1. Hence by [F3] ru=ua+2ru.

2.1step 1.1F1F2F6F7algebra

Constant codes: let x~ be the constant sequence x~n:=ru. By step 1.1, (Tuˉx~)n=ua+ru+ru=ua+2ru=ru=x~n for all n; so x~ is a fixed point of Tuˉ in BR (indeed ∣ru∣≤1+a+1<a+2<R by [F7] and a≥100). By uniqueness ([F1]) x(uˉ)=x~, hence h(uˉ)=(ru,ru); and F(ru,ru)=(ru,ru2−a−ru)=(ru,ru) because ru2−a=2ru.

3.1step 2.1F1F2F5algebra

Convergence in the forward direction: let m≥0 and let n≥N+m−1; then every j with ∣j−n∣≤m−1 satisfies j≥n−(m−1)≥N, hence sj=u=uˉj. By [F1], (Tsm0)n=(Tuˉm0)n. Therefore ∣xn(s)−xn(uˉ)∣≤∣xn(s)−(Tsm0)n∣+∣(Tuˉm0)n−xn(uˉ)∣≤4RL−m for n≥N+m−1, using the uniform error bound of [F1] twice and x(uˉ)=x~ of step 2.1. Given ε>0, choose m with 4RL−m<ε, possible by [F5]; then ∣xn(s)−ru∣<ε for all n≥N+m−1. Hence xn(s)→ru as n→+∞, and therefore Fn(h(s))=(xn−1(s),xn(s))→(ru,ru) by [F1].

3.2step 2.1F1F2algebra

Nonconstancy: suppose s≠uˉ; then there is k with sk≠u, and by [F1] sign⁡xk(s)=sk≠u=sign⁡ru, so xk(s)≠ru and h(s)=(x−1(s),x0(s)); if h(s)=(ru,ru) then x−1(s)=x0(s)=ru, and then by the recurrence xn(s)=ru for all n, so sn=sign⁡xn(s)=u for all n, a contradiction. Hence h(s)≠(ru,ru). Since Fn(h(s))=h(S±ns) by [F2] and each S±ns is again not constant, the same argument gives Fn(h(s))≠(ru,ru) for all n∈Z.

4.1step 3.1F1algebra

Convergence in the backward direction: if n≤−N−(m−1) and ∣j−n∣≤m−1, then j≤n+(m−1)≤−N, so ∣j∣≥N and sj=u=uˉj. Locality [F1] therefore gives (Tsm0)n=(Tuˉm0)n, and the same two uniform error bounds as in step 3.1 yield ∣xn(s)−ru∣≤4RL−m. Hence xn(s)→ru as n→−∞. Since F is a bijection ([F1]) and Fn(h(s))=(xn−1(s),xn(s)), this says Fn(h(s))→(ru,ru) as n→−∞.

5.1step 3.1step 4.1step 3.2F1F4

Homoclinic points: by steps 3.1 and 4.1, the point h(s) lies in Ws(ru,ru)∩Wu(ru,ru) (the forward and backward orbits are defined for all times because F is a bijection and Fn(h(s))=(xn−1(s),xn(s)) for all n), and by step 3.2 it differs from the fixed point. By the definition [F4] it is a homoclinic point of (ru,ru).

6.1step 5.1F1∎

Distinctness: if s≠t then h(s)≠h(t) because h is injective by [F1]; the nonconstant finite-word codes are infinite in number (for example the codes differing from uˉ at exactly the coordinates 0,1,…,j for j≥0 are pairwise distinct), so there are infinitely many distinct homoclinic points.

Remarks

  • The convergence rates are uniform in the code: for a code that agrees with uˉ for ∣n∣≥N, the deviation satisfies ∣xn(s)−ru∣≤4RL−m whenever ∣n∣≥N+m−1.

  • The two constant codes give fixed points, not homoclinic points; homoclinic points arise precisely from nonconstant codes with constant tails, which are the finite-word deviations promised by the design.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources