Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Explicit root margins at a=100: endpoint signs 25 and 43, and d=2/13 for η=1

Example

Take a=100 in Root bounds and C1 dependence for the perturbed scalar recurrence v2−a−u−w+e(u,v,w)=0, so that R=13, l=7, and suppose the defect bound is η=1. Then:

  1. for all u,w∈[−13,13] the unperturbed quadratic v2−100−u−w satisfies

v2−100−u−w∣v=7≤49−100+26=−25,v2−100−u−w∣v=13≥169−100−26=43,

so the signs at the endpoints are strictly opposite with margins 25 and 43; 2. the derivative bound is d=(1+η)/(2l−η)=(1+1)/(14−1)=2/13, and

2d=413<1,d(12+2)=513<1,d1−d/2=2/1312/13=16<23;

  1. the root margins are at least 24/27>3/4 and 42/27>3/4, since the slope of Pu,w is bounded by 2R+η=27 on [7,13].

Facts & Assumptions

[L1]

Perturbed root data (Root bounds and C1 dependence for the perturbed scalar recurrence v2−a−u−w+e(u,v,w)=0): with η as the defect bound, the root map satisfies ∣∂uMs∣,∣∂wMs∣≤d=(1+η)/(2l−η) and every root v=Ms(u,w) satisfies sv−l≥34 and R−sv≥34.

[L2]

Elementary arithmetic (Square roots exist: a unique a≥0 with (a)2=a; the positives are {x2:x≠0}, Absolute value in an ordered field, Basic properties of the absolute value, Intervals of R: the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length): 72=49, 132=169, 2⋅13=26, 14−1=13, 4/13<1, 5/13<1, 1/6<2/3, and 24/27>3/4, 42/27>3/4.

Verification

technique · direct; evaluate the quadratic at the two endpoints in the worst case and substitute the numerical data into the general bounds
1.1givenL2algebra

Endpoint signs: for u,w∈[−13,13] the sum u+w ranges over [−26,26], so v2−100−u−w at v=7 is at most 49−100+26=−25<0, and at v=13 is at least 169−100−26=43>0.

1.2givenL1L2algebra

Derivative bound and cone constants: substituting l=7, η=1 into d=(1+η)/(2l−η) gives d=2/13, and the displayed inequalities follow from [L2].

2.1givenstep 1.1L1L2algebra∎

Margins: with η=1 and 2R+η=27, the endpoint margins guaranteed by the root lemma are 24/27 and 42/27: the endpoint values of Pu,w have magnitudes at least 25−1=24 and 43−1=42, and ∣Pu,w′∣≤27 on [7,13]. Thus the root distances are at least 24/27>3/4 and 42/27>3/4, consistent with the general margins of [L1].

Remarks

  • Every number is evaluated symbolically at the worst case a=100 and η=1; larger a or smaller η only improve the margins.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources