Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The ideal planar pendulum: equation of motion, conserved energy, Lyapunov stability and the frequency g/l

Example

Let m,l,g>0 and let Ω:=(−π,π)⊆R. Consider the embedding

X:Ω→R2,X(θ):=(lsin⁡θ, −lcos⁡θ),

the ambient mass M:=mI2 and the constant force F:=(0,−mg). Let I⊆R be a nonempty open interval (Intervals of R: the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length), let θ:I→Ω be a C2 curve and put x(t):=X(θ(t)). Then:

  1. X is a C3 immersion with ∥X′(θ)∥2=l for every θ; if the ambient motion satisfies Mx′′=F+R with R(t)⋅X′(θ(t))δ=0 for all δ∈R, then

ml2θ′′(t)+mglsin⁡θ(t)=0(t∈I);

  1. the reduced energy E(θ,θ′):=12ml2θ′2−mglcos⁡θ is constant along every solution of the equation;
  2. θ=0 is a strict local minimum of the reduced potential Ured(θ):=−mglcos⁡θ on Ω, and the equilibrium (0,0) of the pendulum system θ′=v, v′=−(g/l)sin⁡θ is Lyapunov stable;
  3. the linearisation at θ=0 is ml2ξ′′+mglξ=0, a quadratic mode with angular frequency

ω=g/l.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The parameters m,l,g>0, the embedding X, the matrix M=mI2, the force F=(0,−mg), the nonempty open interval I, a C2 curve θ:I→Ω with x=X∘θ, and a reaction R as in clause 1.

[F1]

Derivatives of X: since sin⁡′=cos⁡, cos⁡′=−sin⁡ (The derivatives of sine and cosine are cosine and minus sine), X′(θ)=(lcos⁡θ,lsin⁡θ) and X′′(θ)=(−lsin⁡θ,lcos⁡θ); hence ∥X′(θ)∥22=l2, X′(θ)⋅X′′(θ)=0 and X′(θ)⋅F=−mglsin⁡θ (The Euclidean inner product ⟨x,y⟩=∑k<nxkyk on Rn, The chain rule for total derivatives: D(g∘f)(a)=Dg(f(a))∘Df(a)). Since ∥X′(θ)∥2=l≠0, the derivative X′(θ) is injective and X is an immersion (Submersions and immersions between Euclidean open sets).

[F2]

The reduced d'Alembert corollary (Reduced d'Alembert equation for an immersion: generalized forces and the quadratic correction): under the hypothesis on R in clause 1, X′(θ)TMX′(θ) θ′′=X′(θ)TF−X′(θ)TMX′′(θ) θ′2.

[F3]

The batch-3 energy-stability theorem (A strict local minimum of the potential gives a Lyapunov stable equilibrium of the mechanical system, by energy conservation, The mechanical first-order field, Lagrangian and energy of a configuration-dependent kinetic metric in a chart): for an open Ω⊆R, a constant positive mass M0, a C2 potential U and a strict local minimum θ0 of U with U′(θ0)=0, the equilibrium (θ0,0) of θ′=v, v′=−U′(θ)/M0 is Lyapunov stable.

[F4]

The quadratic-mode theorem (Decoupling of the constant-coefficient quadratic system Mq′′+Kq=0 into normal modes, with the zero-mode and energy identities): for a symmetric positive definite mass M and a symmetric non-negative stiffness K, the linear system Mξ′′+Kξ=0 has modes of frequency λ with λ the eigenvalues of M−1/2KM−1/2.

Verification

technique · direct; contract the ambient equation with $X'$ and identify the resulting one-dimensional mechanical system, then invoke the stability and mode theorems
1.1F1F2algebra

Clause 1: by [F2] and [F1], X′TMX′ θ′′=l2m θ′′=X′TF−X′TMX′′θ′2=−mglsin⁡θ−0⋅θ′2, because M=mI2 and X′⋅X′′=0. Dividing by ml2>0 gives ml2θ′′+mglsin⁡θ=0.

2.1F5step 1.1algebra

Clause 2: along a solution, by the product and chain rules [F5], ddtE(θ,θ′)=ml2θ′θ′′+mglsin⁡θ θ′=θ′(ml2θ′′+mglsin⁡θ)=0, so by [F5] the energy is constant on I.

2.2F5step 1.1algebra

Clause 3: the reduced potential Ured(θ)=−mglcos⁡θ is C2 with Ured′(θ)=mglsin⁡θ, so Ured′(0)=0; and for 0<∣θ∣<π one has θ∉2πZ, hence cos⁡θ<1 by [F5], so Ured(θ)−Ured(0)=mgl(1−cos⁡θ)>0. Thus 0 is a strict local minimum of Ured on Ω. With M0:=ml2>0, U:=Ured and θ0:=0, the mechanical vector field of [F3] is (θ,v)↦(v, (ml2)−1(−mglsin⁡θ))=(v,−(g/l)sin⁡θ), which is the pendulum system; [F3] makes (0,0) Lyapunov stable.

2.3F4step 1.1algebra

Clause 4: the right-hand side of the pendulum equation is −(g/l)sin⁡θ; since sin⁡0=0 and sin⁡′(0)=cos⁡0=1 (The derivatives of sine and cosine are cosine and minus sine), the linearisation at θ=0 is ml2ξ′′+mglξ=0. This is the constant-coefficient quadratic system of [F4] with M=ml2 and K=mgl; the transformed stiffness is λ=K/M=g/l>0, so [F4] gives a mode of angular frequency ω=λ=g/l.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1step 2.2step 2.3∎

Clauses 1-4 are proved.

Remarks

  • The example is a mathematical model of an ideal frictionless planar pendulum in a uniform downward force field; statements about a real pendulum require apparatus, friction and measurement assumptions that are not part of this item. The stability conclusion is Lyapunov stability, not asymptotic attraction, and it concerns the exact pendulum equation in the chart Ω=(−π,π).

  • The frequency g/l is the frequency of the linearised mode by [F4]; no claim is made that the nonlinear pendulum oscillates periodically with that frequency for finite amplitude.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources