How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Finite pair dynamics immediately creates correlations
Statement
Use the finite-N model and units of Smooth periodic finite-N and scaled mean-field phase data. Let , , mass in kilograms, side length in metres, and choose a smooth, even, nonconstant periodic potential in joules with force in newtons. Let in kilogram-metres per second and . Let be the quotient position volume induced from Euclidean Lebesgue measure on and let be momentum Lebesgue measure as defined from The one-dimensional torus and its normalized Haar integral. The canonical phase volume is as in Exact normalized BBGKY hierarchy. The normalized initial density relative to is
The density factorizes into uniform position densities and centered Gaussian momentum densities. Under the exact smooth periodic finite-particle flow, the one-particle marginal has , while
which is nonzero on a nonempty open subset of phase space. Thus the evolved two-particle law fails to remain a product for every sufficiently small nonzero time. No factorization or chaos assumption is made at positive time.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The smooth even periodic pair model, , the displayed normalized product density, and countable choice for the completed-product hierarchy input.
Smooth periodic finite-N and scaled mean-field phase data: positions lie in , momenta in , and the pair force is the odd periodic field in the stated model.
Exact normalized BBGKY hierarchy: the exact normalized hierarchy follows from the finite- Liouville equation under symmetry, smoothness, rapid tails and countable choice.
The Axiom of Countable Choice (): assume countable choice as required by the completed-product integration input in [F2].
The one-dimensional torus and its normalized Haar integral: the position measure on is induced by Lebesgue measure on , and is a normalized probability.
Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product: nonnegative product integrals on sigma-finite Euclidean product spaces equal their iterated integrals.
Proof
By [F3], the position density is normalized on . Scaling and applying [F4] gives ; Tonelli [F5] factors the -dimensional integral, so . Therefore integrates to one relative to . It is symmetric and smooth; every momentum derivative is a polynomial times a Gaussian, so it has all rapid-tail bounds required by [F2]. Its one-particle marginal is .
Use the case of [F2]: At , the streaming derivative vanishes because is independent of . Also : by [F3], this is the normalized fundamental-cube integral of a periodic derivative of , which is zero in each coordinate by the fundamental theorem of calculus and periodicity. Thus the force average in the marginal equation is identically zero before its momentum divergence, and .
The joint Liouville equation in [F2] has interaction coefficient . The initial position derivatives vanish, and . Consequently Because is nonconstant, its gradient is nonzero at some point; continuity gives an open set of differences where . For each such difference, the condition holds on a nonempty open momentum set, and is strictly positive there. Hence the joint derivative is nonzero on a nonempty open set.
If the evolved joint density remained the product of its two one-particle marginals on a time interval around zero, differentiating that product at would give by step 2.1. Step 2.2 gives a nonzero joint derivative on an open set, a contradiction. At a point in that set, differentiability makes the difference between the joint density and the product density nonzero for all sufficiently small nonzero times. Thus correlations appear immediately from this initially factorized law.
Remarks
This example shows that an initially factorized law need not remain factorized under the exact finite- interaction. It does not contradict a large- propagation-of-chaos limit, which is a separate asymptotic claim. Here “correlation production” means only loss of the exact factorization .