Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pendingjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Static electrostatic test-energy first integral

Example

Let Ω⊆R3 be open and let ϕ∈C∞(Ω,R), assigned volts in SI bookkeeping. On M=Rx0×Ω with Minkowski metric, orientation dx0∧dx1∧dx2∧dx3, future time-orientation N=∂0, and length coordinate x0=ct, take the static one-form A=−(ϕ/c)dx0 and F=dA. Let I⊆R be an open interval with nonempty interior (Intervals of R: the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length) and let z:I→M be an existing C2 future-timelike curve parametrized by proper time τ in the sense of Timelike worldlines, proper time, length and four-velocity on a Lorentzian four-manifold, with U=dz/dτ, g(U,U)=−c2, and m∇UU=qF♯(U) for constants m>0 and q∈R, assigned kilograms and coulombs respectively. Write w=dx/dt, ∣w∣<c, and γL=(1−∣w∣2/c2)−1/2.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The stated Minkowski metric and static potential, a supplied timelike curve satisfying the Lorentz-force equation, and the constants c,m,q.

[F1]

Smooth formal matter, EM tensors and observer quantities: a local potential is a supplied one-form A with F=dA; F♯(U)a=FabUb.

[F2]

Killing exchange current and gauge-compensated charged first integral: if ξ is Killing, LξA=dχ, and the supplied curve satisfies m∇UU=qF♯(U), then mg(U,ξ)+q(A(ξ)−χ) is constant. Its current stress clause remains conditionally open at its draft Maxwell-stress supplier; this example uses only the separate test-particle clause at its exact interface.

[F3]

Timelike worldlines, proper time, length and four-velocity on a Lorentzian four-manifold: proper-time parametrization of a C2 future-timelike curve gives g(U,U)=−c2; this normalization is also stated explicitly in the Example.

[A1]

The metric and potential are prescribed; the curve is assumed to exist in Ω. No self-field or coupled-field existence claim is included.

Verification

1.1F1F2A1algebra

The vector field ξ=∂x0 is Killing because the Minkowski components are constant. The potential is independent of x0, so LξA=0=dχ with χ=0. The hypotheses of the test-particle clause in [F2] are exactly those in the Example.

2.1F1F2F3step 1.1algebra∎

Put t=x0/c, so U0=c dt/dτ and Ui=wi dt/dτ. The normalization g(U,U)=−c2 gives −(c2−∣w∣2)(dt/dτ)2=−c2; because the curve is future-directed, dt/dτ>0, hence dt/dτ=γL and U0=γLc. Thus g(U,ξ)=g00U0=−γLc, while A(ξ)=A0=−ϕ/c. The conserved scalar is C=−γLmc−qϕ/c, and multiplying by −c gives the conserved energy expression γLmc2+qϕ.

Remarks

This is a test-particle first integral in a prescribed static background. It does not assert that Minkowski space with nonzero F solves the coupled Einstein equation. The expression uses kinetic momentum and the stated potential gauge; general gauge changes are covered by the compensator in the supplier theorem.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources