Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Smooth formal matter, EM tensors and observer quantities — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

Scope

These examples calculate an advected but spatially varying charged-dust ratio without Maxwell closure, local Ohmic heating in an imposed field, anisotropic magnetic stress and a future-null observer energy-current vector, and a static electrostatic test-particle first integral. They are exact mathematical calculations under their displayed fields, domains, and supplier hypotheses. They report no measurements and do not assert a coupled Einstein–Maxwell solution, matter evolution, or a singular point-particle model.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, postulates, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, experiments and counterexamples

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck pendingjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Advected nonconstant charge ratio without Maxwell closure

Example

Let M=R4 with length coordinates (x0,x1,x2,x3), Minkowski metric η=diag⁡(−1,1,1,1), orientation dx0∧dx1∧dx2∧dx3, future time-orientation N=∂0, and x0=ct. In SI bookkeeping, assign [ρ0]=kg m−3, [L]=m, and [α∗]=C kg−1. Choose ρ0>0, L>0, and α∗≠0. Set

U=c ∂0,ρ=ρ0,α(x)=α∗(1+(x1/L)2),σ=ρ0α,F=0.

The fields are smooth and the ratio α=σ/ρ is nonconstant in space. This is a mathematical example of the matter balance and transport equations; the sourced Maxwell equation is not imposed.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The stated Minkowski coordinates and fields; ρ0,L>0 and α∗≠0.

[F1]

Smooth formal matter, EM tensors and observer quantities: g(U,U)=−c2, Tmab=ρUaUb, ja=σUa, and the sourced Maxwell equation would be ∇aFab=−μ0jb with μ0>0.

[F2]

Charged dust balance equivalence and advected charge ratio: on a positive-density domain, dust exchange is equivalent to continuity and the Lorentz-force equation; under continuity, ∇aja=0 is equivalent to Ua∇aα=0.

Verification

1.1givenF1F2algebra

The constant Minkowski connection gives g(U,U)=−c2, ∇a(ρUa)=∂0(ρ0c)=0, and Ua∂aα=c∂0α=0. Since ρ0>0, [F2] yields charge-current conservation ∇a(σUa)=0.

2.1givenF2step 1.1algebra

The acceleration of U is zero, and FbcUc=0 because F=0. Thus the force equation and mass continuity in [F2] hold, so the matter-exchange equation holds. But α(0)=α∗ and α(L)=2α∗, which differ because α∗≠0; hence α is not spatially constant.

3.1givenF1algebra∎

The factor 1+(x1/L)2 is at least 1, so j=ρ0αU is nonzero everywhere. For F=0, the sourced Maxwell equation would read 0=−μ0jb, which fails. Hence matter balance and charge transport alone do not supply Maxwell closure.

Remarks

The example is not a coupled Einstein–Maxwell solution and makes no claim about physical existence. It shows exactly why constant σ/ρ is not a consequence of the dust exchange identity.

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck pendingOpen item page →

Explicit local conduction-energy calculation

Example

Let M=R4 with global length coordinates (x0,x1,x2,x3) and metric components gab=ηab=diag⁡(−1,1,1,1) in the coordinate frame ∂a:=∂/∂xa. Use this metric to raise and lower indices and its Levi–Civita connection ∇. Take orientation dx0∧dx1∧dx2∧dx3, future time-orientation N=∂0, and the positive parameters c,μ0 of Smooth formal matter, EM tensors and observer quantities, with x0=ct. Choose constants with SI units [E0]=V m−1, [χ]=S m−1, and [ϵi]=[p0]=J m−3, with E0≠0, χ>0, ϵi>0, and p0∈R. Let I=(−ϵi/(2χE02),ϵi/(2χE02)), which has units of seconds; put t=x0/c and restrict all fields to the open spacetime domain D:={x∈R4:t(x)∈I}≅R3×I. The maps E,B:D→R3 below give the spatial components relative to the positively oriented orthonormal frame (∂0,∂1,∂2,∂3), with ex=(1,0,0). Define

U=c∂0,E=E0ex,B=0,ϵ(t)=ϵi+χE02t,p=p0,σ=0,qa=(0,χE0,0,0).

Let F be the antisymmetric covariant two-tensor with F01=−E0/c and all other independent components zero, and set j=q. All the displayed scalar, vector and tensor fields are smooth on D. The interval gives ϵi/2<ϵ(t)<3ϵi/2 throughout D. The imposed field is a fixed background for the matter calculation; the nonzero current is not claimed to solve its Maxwell equation.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The stated fields on R3×I, with χ,ϵi>0, E0≠0, and U=(c,0,0,0).

[F1]

Smooth formal matter, EM tensors and observer quantities: Tmab=(ϵ+p)UaUb/c2+pgab, EUa=FabUb, and the formal exchange force is fb=Fbcjc.

[F2]

Perfect-fluid exchange projections and conduction heating: if q⋅U=0 and q=χEU, then the comoving exchange term is −Ubfb=χg(EU,EU).

[A1]

The current is imposed as j=q with qaUa=0; the fixed F is not asserted to satisfy the sourced Maxwell equation.

Verification

1.1F1A1algebra

The constant diagonal metric has inverse gab=ηab=diag⁡(−1,1,1,1) and zero Levi–Civita Christoffel symbols. Thus Ua=(−c,0,0,0), g(U,U)=−c2, and g(U,N)=−c<0, so U is future timelike with the required normalization. The chosen q is orthogonal to U, and EU1=F10U0=(E0/c)c=E0, with its other components zero. Thus q=χEU. The stress tensor has Tm00=ϵ(t), Tmii=p0, and zero off-diagonal components, so ∇aTma0=∂0ϵ=(1/c)dϵ/dt=χE02/c while ∇aTmai=0.

2.1F1F2step 1.1algebra

Raising the first index with η gives F01=E0/c and Fi1=0 for i=1,2,3. Hence f0=F01q1=χE02/c and fi=0. The component equations verify ∇aTmab=fb, and [F2] gives −Ubfb=χE02>0.

3.1F1A1algebra∎

Since F is constant, ∇aFab=0, whereas −μ0j1=−μ0χE0≠0. Thus the matter exchange and positive heating calculation is conditional on the imposed background and is not a sourced Maxwell solution.

Remarks

The calculation is local and includes no equation of state, entropy balance, electromagnetic backreaction, or global fluid solution. The units [χ]=S m−1 and [E0]=V m−1 make χE02 a power density, but the example reports no measurement.

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck pendingjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Anisotropic magnetic stress and null energy-current vector

Example

Work pointwise on Minkowski space with length coordinates x0=ct, signature (−,+,+,+), orientation dx0∧dx1∧dx2∧dx3, and future time-orientation N=∂0. In SI bookkeeping assign [B0]=T and [E0]=V m−1. First take E=0, B=B0ez with B0≠0. Then take E=E0ex, B=(E0/c)ey with E0≠0. These are explicit field-component calculations; no coupled Einstein solution is asserted.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Maxwell tensor and observer conventions of Smooth formal matter, EM tensors and observer quantities, with μ0,c>0.

[F1]

Smooth formal matter, EM tensors and observer quantities: TEMab=μ0−1(FacFbc−14gabFcdFcd) and F0i=−Ei/c, Fij=ϵijkBk in an oriented orthonormal frame.

[F2]

EM, dust and perfect-fluid energy inequalities: TEM is trace-free and satisfies DEC; its observer current is −Tabnb.

[F3]

The observer rest-space decomposition and the spatial projection: the orthogonal complement of a future timelike vector in a Lorentzian four-space is three-dimensional and has positive-definite metric.

[F4]

Smooth formal matter, EM tensors and observer quantities: a perfect-fluid tensor has Tmab=(ϵ+p)UaUb/c2+pgab for a future timelike U with g(U,U)=−c2 and real ϵ,p.

[A1]

B0≠0 and E0≠0 in the two respective examples. All quantities are pointwise mathematical components.

Verification

1.1F1A1algebra

For the pure magnetic case, the only independent nonzero component is F12=B0, so FabFab=2B02. Substitution in [F1] gives u=B02/(2μ0) and TEMab=diag⁡(u,u,u,−u) in the order (0,x,y,z), with all off-diagonal entries zero. The rest observer n=∂0 has current −Tabnb=(u,0,0,0), which is timelike.

1.2F3F4algebra

The mixed tensor is Tab=diag⁡(−u,u,u,−u), so its two distinct eigenvalues each have eigenspace dimension two because u>0. For a perfect fluid, [F4] gives Tab=(ϵ+p)UaUb/c2+pδab. This map sends the timelike vector U to −ϵU and every vector orthogonal to U to p times that vector; U⊥ is three-dimensional by [F3] applied to U/c. If −ϵ=p, the map is the scalar map pI and all four eigenvalues coincide; otherwise its eigenvalue multiplicities are one and three. The magnetic tensor has neither spectrum, so it cannot be a perfect-fluid tensor in any observer frame.

2.1F1F2A1algebra∎

For the crossed-field case, F01=−E0/c and F31=E0/c are the only independent nonzero components. They give FabFab=0 and u=E02/(μ0c2). Direct substitution yields T00=T03=T30=T33=u and all other components zero. Therefore −Tabnb=(u,0,0,u) for n=∂0, whose norm is −u2+u2=0 and whose time component is positive. The DEC current is future null, so its causal bound is saturated.

Remarks

The first tensor is anisotropic even though its rest-frame spatial energy-current component vanishes. In the crossed-field case, the observer energy-current vector is future null, while the physical SI energy-flux vector is the nonzero spatial vector (E02/(μ0c))ez with magnitude cu. These are exact algebraic consequences of the displayed tensors and do not describe measured fields.

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck pendingjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Static electrostatic test-energy first integral

Example

Let Ω⊆R3 be open and let ϕ∈C∞(Ω,R), assigned volts in SI bookkeeping. On M=Rx0×Ω with Minkowski metric, orientation dx0∧dx1∧dx2∧dx3, future time-orientation N=∂0, and length coordinate x0=ct, take the static one-form A=−(ϕ/c)dx0 and F=dA. Let I⊆R be an open interval with nonempty interior (Intervals of R: the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length) and let z:I→M be an existing C2 future-timelike curve parametrized by proper time τ in the sense of Timelike worldlines, proper time, length and four-velocity on a Lorentzian four-manifold, with U=dz/dτ, g(U,U)=−c2, and m∇UU=qF♯(U) for constants m>0 and q∈R, assigned kilograms and coulombs respectively. Write w=dx/dt, ∣w∣<c, and γL=(1−∣w∣2/c2)−1/2.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The stated Minkowski metric and static potential, a supplied timelike curve satisfying the Lorentz-force equation, and the constants c,m,q.

[F1]

Smooth formal matter, EM tensors and observer quantities: a local potential is a supplied one-form A with F=dA; F♯(U)a=FabUb.

[F2]

Killing exchange current and gauge-compensated charged first integral: if ξ is Killing, LξA=dχ, and the supplied curve satisfies m∇UU=qF♯(U), then mg(U,ξ)+q(A(ξ)−χ) is constant. Its current stress clause remains conditionally open at its draft Maxwell-stress supplier; this example uses only the separate test-particle clause at its exact interface.

[F3]

Timelike worldlines, proper time, length and four-velocity on a Lorentzian four-manifold: proper-time parametrization of a C2 future-timelike curve gives g(U,U)=−c2; this normalization is also stated explicitly in the Example.

[A1]

The metric and potential are prescribed; the curve is assumed to exist in Ω. No self-field or coupled-field existence claim is included.

Verification

1.1F1F2A1algebra

The vector field ξ=∂x0 is Killing because the Minkowski components are constant. The potential is independent of x0, so LξA=0=dχ with χ=0. The hypotheses of the test-particle clause in [F2] are exactly those in the Example.

2.1F1F2F3step 1.1algebra∎

Put t=x0/c, so U0=c dt/dτ and Ui=wi dt/dτ. The normalization g(U,U)=−c2 gives −(c2−∣w∣2)(dt/dτ)2=−c2; because the curve is future-directed, dt/dτ>0, hence dt/dτ=γL and U0=γLc. Thus g(U,ξ)=g00U0=−γLc, while A(ξ)=A0=−ϕ/c. The conserved scalar is C=−γLmc−qϕ/c, and multiplying by −c gives the conserved energy expression γLmc2+qϕ.

Remarks

This is a test-particle first integral in a prescribed static background. It does not assert that Minkowski space with nonzero F solves the coupled Einstein equation. The expression uses kinetic momentum and the stated potential gauge; general gauge changes are covered by the compensator in the supplier theorem.

Sources