How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
EM, dust and perfect-fluid energy inequalities
Statement
Use the energy-condition definitions of Pointwise Maxwell and matter energy-condition vocabulary and the matter and Maxwell tensor definitions of Smooth formal matter, EM tensors and observer quantities. At every point of an oriented time-oriented Lorentzian domain, the Maxwell tensor of that definition is symmetric, trace-free, and satisfies WEC, NEC, SEC and DEC. Its observer energy density and energy flux in a positively oriented orthonormal rest frame are
and the DEC flux is future causal or zero. A charged-dust tensor with satisfies all four conditions. For a perfect-fluid tensor with rest energy density and pressure , the exact pointwise conditions are
At a point, finite sums of tensors satisfying any one of these conditions still satisfy that condition; in particular satisfies all four for nonnegative dust. No general matter positivity assumption is made, and adding to an arbitrary fluid need not repair a violated fluid inequality.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A smooth Lorentzian metric and the tensors, observer, field, and energy-condition definitions of Smooth formal matter, EM tensors and observer quantities. For dust, assume ; for a perfect fluid, use the displayed rest-frame tensor with real .
Smooth formal matter, EM tensors and observer quantities: ; the observer convention is , ; the matter tensors have the displayed dust and perfect-fluid forms.
Pointwise Maxwell and matter energy-condition vocabulary: WEC, NEC, SEC and DEC have the exact pointwise definitions used in the Statement; in particular DEC requires to be future causal or zero for every future timelike .
Smooth time-oriented Lorentzian four-manifolds: the geometric objects of the model, Oriented Lorentzian fields, observers and coordinate conventions and The observer rest-space decomposition and the spatial projection: each tangent space has signature ; a future unit observer has a positive-definite rest space , so choosing an orthonormal basis there and orienting it gives a positively oriented orthonormal basis with time vector . The time orientation selects the future cone.
Dust uses only in the dust clauses. No sign restriction is assumed for or before deriving the perfect-fluid equivalences.
Proof
In a positively oriented orthonormal frame with future unit time vector , the convention in [F1] gives , , and . Substitution in the tensor formula yields and . Symmetry follows because is symmetric in ; its trace is .
In a fluid rest frame . For a future timelike vector , , its quadratic form is . Thus and suffice for WEC; past timelike vectors give the same value as their negatives. Necessity follows by taking , which forces , and then with : if , the displayed value tends to that negative number, so is negative for some . For a nonzero future null , , so NEC is equivalent to .
The mixed tensor of the perfect fluid is in the same frame. Hence . If , then its time component is nonnegative and its squared norm is ; it is therefore future causal or zero for every . Conversely the rest vector forces , while requiring the vector to be causal for gives for every . Letting yields . This proves DEC iff .
Put and . For any future unit observer used as the time vector of such a frame, the observer energy current has components . The component identity and give . Its time component is nonnegative and its squared norm is , so it is future causal or zero for every future unit observer. Every future timelike is a positive multiple of a future unit vector; the current scales by that same positive factor, proving DEC for all such .
The trace is . The trace-reversed tensor has rest energy density and pressure . Applying the WEC equivalence from step 1.2 to this tensor gives SEC iff and .
For a future timelike , DEC gives a future-causal . In the rest frame of , with and , so ; this proves WEC for future timelike vectors, and proves it for past timelike vectors too. For a nonzero future null , vectors are future timelike for every and tend to , so continuity of the quadratic form proves NEC. Since has zero trace by step 1.1, its trace-reversed tensor equals itself; SEC is therefore WEC.
For dust, write and ; then is the perfect-fluid tensor. Steps 1.2–3.1 give all four conditions because .
For a finite family, the future causal cone in an orthonormal frame consists of with . If lie in this cone, then , so their sum is future causal. Since the DEC current is linear in , finite sums preserve DEC. The WEC and NEC inequalities are linear in , and trace reversal is linear in , so finite sums preserve WEC, NEC and SEC as well. Therefore the Maxwell and nonnegative-dust conclusions add.
Remarks
- The strong condition here is defined on the trace-reversed tensor and uses no Einstein field equation. This avoids importing a physical postulate into a mathematical statement.
- The vector in the Statement is the spatial component of the observer energy-current, with SI units . The physical SI energy-flux vector is , in ; it is times that current component.
- A magnetic field parallel to one spatial axis has principal stresses ; Example Anisotropic magnetic stress and null energy-current vector ↗ verifies the anisotropy and its consequence for perfect-fluid form.
Depends on
Smooth formal matter, EM tensors and observer quantities
Pointwise Maxwell and matter energy-condition vocabulary
Smooth time-oriented Lorentzian four-manifolds: the geometric objects of the model
Oriented Lorentzian fields, observers and coordinate conventions
The observer rest-space decomposition and the spatial projection
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Sources
- Sean M. Carroll, Lecture Notes on General Relativity, arXiv:gr-qc/9712019v1 (1997), §1.4.1, equation (1.111), PDF p. 36 (printed p. 30)
- David Tong, General Relativity, full author-hosted lecture notes, 2019, §§4.5.3–4.5.4 and §4.5.7, equations (4.52)–(4.55), (4.60)–(4.62), PDF pp. 190–194 and 201–204 (printed pp. 183–187 and 194–197)