Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pendingjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

EM, dust and perfect-fluid energy inequalities

Statement

Use the energy-condition definitions of Pointwise Maxwell and matter energy-condition vocabulary and the matter and Maxwell tensor definitions of Smooth formal matter, EM tensors and observer quantities. At every point of an oriented time-oriented Lorentzian domain, the Maxwell tensor TEM of that definition is symmetric, trace-free, and satisfies WEC, NEC, SEC and DEC. Its observer energy density and energy flux in a positively oriented orthonormal rest frame are

u=∣E∣2/c2+∣B∣22μ0,E×Bμ0c,

and the DEC flux is future causal or zero. A charged-dust tensor with ρ≥0 satisfies all four conditions. For a perfect-fluid tensor with rest energy density ϵ and pressure p, the exact pointwise conditions are

WEC  ⟺  ϵ≥0 and ϵ+p≥0,NEC  ⟺  ϵ+p≥0,

SEC  ⟺  ϵ+p≥0 and ϵ+3p≥0,DEC  ⟺  ϵ≥∣p∣.

At a point, finite sums of tensors satisfying any one of these conditions still satisfy that condition; in particular TEM+Tm satisfies all four for nonnegative dust. No general matter positivity assumption is made, and adding TEM to an arbitrary fluid need not repair a violated fluid inequality.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A smooth Lorentzian metric and the tensors, observer, field, and energy-condition definitions of Smooth formal matter, EM tensors and observer quantities. For dust, assume ρ≥0; for a perfect fluid, use the displayed rest-frame tensor with real ϵ,p.

[F1]

Smooth formal matter, EM tensors and observer quantities: TEMab=μ0−1(FacFbc−14gabFcdFcd); the observer convention is F0i=−Ei/c, Fij=ϵijkBk; the matter tensors have the displayed dust and perfect-fluid forms.

[F2]

Pointwise Maxwell and matter energy-condition vocabulary: WEC, NEC, SEC and DEC have the exact pointwise definitions used in the Statement; in particular DEC requires −Tabvb to be future causal or zero for every future timelike v.

[F3]

Smooth time-oriented Lorentzian four-manifolds: the geometric objects of the model, Oriented Lorentzian fields, observers and coordinate conventions and The observer rest-space decomposition and the spatial projection: each tangent space has signature (−,+,+,+); a future unit observer n has a positive-definite rest space n⊥, so choosing an orthonormal basis there and orienting it gives a positively oriented orthonormal basis with time vector n. The time orientation selects the future cone.

[A1]

Dust uses ρ≥0 only in the dust clauses. No sign restriction is assumed for ϵ or p before deriving the perfect-fluid equivalences.

Proof

1.1F1F3algebra

In a positively oriented orthonormal frame with future unit time vector n=e0, the convention in [F1] gives F0i=−Ei/c, Fij=ϵijkBk, and FabFab=2(∣B∣2−∣E∣2/c2). Substitution in the tensor formula yields TEM00=u and TEM0i=ϵijkEjBk/(μ0c). Symmetry follows because gcdFacFbd is symmetric in a,b; its trace is μ0−1(FcdFcd−14⋅4FcdFcd)=0.

1.2F1F2F3algebra

In a fluid rest frame Tab=diag⁡(ϵ,p,p,p). For a future timelike vector v=(v0,v), v0>∣v∣, its quadratic form is T(v,v)=ϵ((v0)2−∣v∣2)+(ϵ+p)∣v∣2. Thus ϵ≥0 and ϵ+p≥0 suffice for WEC; past timelike vectors give the same value as their negatives. Necessity follows by taking v=(1,0,0,0), which forces ϵ≥0, and then v=(1,r,0,0) with r↑1: if ϵ+p<0, the displayed value tends to that negative number, so is negative for some r<1. For a nonzero future null ℓ, T(ℓ,ℓ)=(ϵ+p)∣ℓ∣2, so NEC is equivalent to ϵ+p≥0.

1.3F1F2F3algebra

The mixed tensor of the perfect fluid is Tab=diag⁡(−ϵ,p,p,p) in the same frame. Hence −Tabvb=(ϵv0,−pv). If ϵ≥∣p∣, then its time component is nonnegative and its squared norm is −ϵ2(v0)2+p2∣v∣2≤−ϵ2((v0)2−∣v∣2)≤0; it is therefore future causal or zero for every v0>∣v∣. Conversely the rest vector forces ϵ≥0, while requiring the vector to be causal for (1,r,0,0) gives ϵ2−p2r2≥0 for every 0<r<1. Letting r↑1 yields ϵ≥∣p∣. This proves DEC iff ϵ≥∣p∣.

2.1step 1.1F1F3algebra

Put a=E/c and b=B. For any future unit observer used as the time vector of such a frame, the observer energy current −Tabnb has components (u,(a×b)/μ0). The component identity ∣a×b∣2=∣a∣2∣b∣2−(a⋅b)2 and (∣a∣−∣b∣)2≥0 give ∣a×b∣/μ0≤∣a∣∣b∣/μ0≤(∣a∣2+∣b∣2)/(2μ0)=u. Its time component is nonnegative and its squared norm is −u2+∣a×b∣2/μ02≤0, so it is future causal or zero for every future unit observer. Every future timelike v is a positive multiple of a future unit vector; the current scales by that same positive factor, proving DEC for all such v.

2.2step 1.2F1F2algebra

The trace is −ϵ+3p. The trace-reversed tensor Tab−12(gcdTcd)gab has rest energy density (ϵ+3p)/2 and pressure (ϵ−p)/2. Applying the WEC equivalence from step 1.2 to this tensor gives SEC iff ϵ+3p≥0 and ϵ+p≥0.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1F1F2F3algebra

For a future timelike v, DEC gives a future-causal Ja=−Tabvb. In the rest frame of v, v=(v0,0,0,0) with v0>0 and J0≥0, so Tabvavb=−g(J,v)=v0J0≥0; this proves WEC for future timelike vectors, and T(−v,−v)=T(v,v) proves it for past timelike vectors too. For a nonzero future null ℓ, vectors ℓ+δn are future timelike for every δ>0 and tend to ℓ, so continuity of the quadratic form proves NEC. Since TEM has zero trace by step 1.1, its trace-reversed tensor equals itself; SEC is therefore WEC.

3.2A1step 1.2step 1.3step 2.2algebra

For dust, write ϵ=ρc2 and p=0; then Tmab=ϵUaUb/c2 is the perfect-fluid tensor. Steps 1.2–3.1 give all four conditions because ρ≥0.

4.1step 2.1step 3.1step 3.2F2F3algebra∎

For a finite family, the future causal cone in an orthonormal frame consists of (t,x) with t≥∣x∣. If Ji=(ti,xi) lie in this cone, then ∑iti≥∑i∣xi∣≥∣∑ixi∣, so their sum is future causal. Since the DEC current is linear in T, finite sums preserve DEC. The WEC and NEC inequalities are linear in T, and trace reversal is linear in T, so finite sums preserve WEC, NEC and SEC as well. Therefore the Maxwell and nonnegative-dust conclusions add.

Remarks

  • The strong condition here is defined on the trace-reversed tensor and uses no Einstein field equation. This avoids importing a physical postulate into a mathematical statement.
  • The vector E×B/(μ0c) in the Statement is the spatial component of the observer energy-current, with SI units J m−3. The physical SI energy-flux vector is E×B/μ0, in W m−2; it is c times that current component.
  • A magnetic field parallel to one spatial axis has principal stresses (u,u,−u); Example Anisotropic magnetic stress and null energy-current vector ↗ verifies the anisotropy and its consequence for perfect-fluid form.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources