How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Constant magnetic slow-orbit error
Example
Let with global length coordinates , , Minkowski metric , orientation , and future direction . Use the SI convention of Smooth formal matter, EM tensors and observer quantities. Write and use the Euclidean product , norm , and orthogonality convention iff . Let and , and write . Let be a charge parameter with units and a mass parameter with units ; set , with units . Let dimensionless and length . For dimensionless , define smooth fields by
Here and ; the corresponding smooth two-form on is specified by and .
Choose a dimensionless initial velocity with , and put . Let the exact relativistic trajectory and the weak/slow comparison trajectory have the same initial position and velocity at . On every finite interval , where and both trajectories are followed, their dimensionless velocities and positions satisfy
Here , , a prime denotes , and the comparison equation is , . For , define . The uniform magnetic field is a prescribed test background: these orbit calculations do not assert an exact coupled Einstein–Maxwell solution on unchanged Minkowski space.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Minkowski geometry, the stated SI field convention, , , , transverse initial velocity with , and matched initial position and velocity.
Smooth formal matter, EM tensors and observer quantities and Controlled weak/slow charged test trajectory comparison give the field convention, the exact prescribed-background Lorentz equation, and the scaled Newton comparison equation.
Smooth source/dust scaling and test-backreaction obstructions shows that a nonzero Maxwell field with positive observer energy does not satisfy the vacuum Einstein equation on unchanged Minkowski space.
The addition formulas for sine and cosine, The derivatives of sine and cosine are cosine and minus sine and Parity and the Pythagorean identity for sine and cosine give the rotation addition, derivative and orthogonality identities.
Square roots exist: a unique with ; the positives are and Inverses of positives are positive, and reciprocation reverses order give the unique positive square root and reciprocal used to define the Lorentz factor.
The mean value theorem, as the case of Cauchy's: for continuous on with and differentiable on there is with and [F3] give : for , the mean value theorem between and gives , and follows from .
Cauchy-Schwarz with its equality case, the triangle inequality for , the parallelogram law and polarisation gives the Euclidean norm triangle and Cauchy–Schwarz inequality. The second fundamental theorem: if is differentiable on with and is integrable, then , Integrable functions on form a set closed under sums and scalar multiples, and , If on and both are integrable then ; and and A continuous function on is Riemann integrable, by Heine-Cantor and Riemann's criterion apply to the continuous trajectory components.
Lorentzian exterior calculus and Hodge star gives the oriented Lorentzian Hodge-star formula; for the positively oriented Minkowski coframe used here it gives .
The field is the prescribed spatially uniform magnetic test field in the Example. No self-field, source construction, radiation reaction, or Einstein equation is imposed.
Verification
In Minkowski coordinates , where . Since , we have . With , the time component of gives , hence . The spatial component gives ; canceling and then using constancy of yields . The dot product with is zero, so and stay constant. Initially, The radicand is at least , so the positive root is defined.
Rescaling time and velocity in the exact equation gives . Differentiating the planar rotation matrix with [F3] verifies the solution The comparison equation in the Statement similarly has the solution , with and . These rotations preserve speed, and keeps the exact speed strictly below . Integrate to define and set . The resulting curve is timelike for every finite . Substitution gives and , so it is an exact worldline. The matrix is orthogonal on the -plane by , and the addition formulas in [F3] give .
Put . Orthogonality and the rotation addition law reduce the velocity difference to . Expanding its two planar components and cancelling the cross terms gives By [F5], its square root is at most . Also This proves the stated velocity bound.
At , the matched initial positions give , which is the claimed bound. Now let . The position difference is the integral of . For any continuous vector function on , Cauchy–Schwarz gives ; taking to be the unit vector in the direction of shows (the zero-integral case is immediate). Thus the velocity bound from step 3.1 gives . Since , the function is continuous and integrable on the nondegenerate interval , and is a primitive; [F6] therefore gives . This proves the claimed position bound. The estimates hold on every specified finite interval; no uniform-in-time bound is asserted.
Put . By the SI convention of [F1], the prescribed two-form is ; [F7] gives . Both forms have constant coefficients in Minkowski coordinates, so , , and . Also because and . Thus the fixed Minkowski metric, , and satisfy the source-free hypotheses of [F2]; taking there gives positive observer energy and a nonzero residual. Hence the prescribed orbit background is not a fully coupled flat Einstein–Maxwell solution with unchanged Minkowski metric. The example establishes only the conditional trajectory calculation and its finite-time comparison.
Depends on
Controlled weak/slow charged test trajectory comparison
Smooth source/dust scaling and test-backreaction obstructions
Smooth formal matter, EM tensors and observer quantities
Lorentzian exterior calculus and Hodge star
The addition formulas for sine and cosine
The derivatives of sine and cosine are cosine and minus sine
Parity and the Pythagorean identity for sine and cosine
The mean value theorem, as the case of Cauchy's: for continuous on with and differentiable on there is with
Square roots exist: a unique with ; the positives are
Inverses of positives are positive, and reciprocation reverses order
Cauchy-Schwarz with its equality case, the triangle inequality for , the parallelogram law and polarisation
The second fundamental theorem: if is differentiable on with and is integrable, then
Integrable functions on form a set closed under sums and scalar multiples, and
If on and both are integrable then ; and
A continuous function on is Riemann integrable, by Heine-Cantor and Riemann's criterion
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Sources
- H. S. Reall, General Relativity, Cambridge Part III lecture notes, 12 October 2022 revision, §6.2, equations (6.9)–(6.10)
- Eric Poisson, Adam Pound and Ian Vega, The Motion of Point Particles in Curved Spacetime, author manuscript arXiv:1102.0529v3 (2011), §18.1, equations (18.3)–(18.10)
- S. M. Carroll, Lecture Notes on General Relativity, arXiv:gr-qc/9712019v1 (1997), §1.4.1, equation (1.103), PDF p. 35 (printed p. 28)