Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Closed flux form without global vector potential

Physical scope

Pure mathematical example; no magnetic-charge or physical premise is asserted.

Example

Put N=R3∖{0}, r=(x2+y2+z2)1/2, and define the smooth two-form β=(x dy∧dz+y dz∧dx+z dx∧dy)/r3 on N. Let T be the tetrahedron with vertices (1,1,1),(1,−1,−1),(−1,1,−1),(−1,−1,1), which contains the origin in its interior. Label these vertices v0,v1,v2,v3 in the displayed order. For 0≤j≤3, let σj:Δ2→N be the affine simplex whose ordered vertices are v0,…,v^j,…,v3, and put cj=(−1)j+1. Let q:N→S2 be q(p)=p/∥p∥2 and ι:S2↪N the inclusion. Then z=∑j=03cj(ι∘q∘σj) is a finite smooth singular two-cycle in N representing the outward-oriented tetrahedron boundary projected to the unit sphere. Then dβ=0 and ∫zβ=4π, so β is not globally exact on N.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The punctured domain, the form β, the tetrahedron T, and its outward orientation as in the Example.

[F1]

The local coordinate formula for the exterior derivative gives dβ=(∂xX1+∂yX2+∂zX3) dx∧dy∧dz when β=X1 dy∧dz+X2 dz∧dx+X3 dx∧dy.

[F3]

Smooth singular chain and cochain complexes defines a smooth singular cycle as a finite smooth chain with zero signed boundary.

[F4]

Lorentzian Hodge star and periods defines the period of a closed form on a finite real smooth singular cycle as the finite signed sum of its simplex integrals, and exactness means a global smooth primitive exists.

[F5]

Integral of a form over a smooth singular simplex defines ∫σβ as the integral of the pullback over the affine simplex, with the chosen orientation determining its sign.

[F6]

The cross product in R3 gives the coordinate cross product used for tangent area vectors.

[F7]

Unit normal fields, orientations, and flux through a regular surface patch fixes the surface orientation through the parameter cross product; an outward-oriented face parametrization has its cross product in the outward normal direction; the boundary orientation is outward normal first.

[F9]

Computing form integrals by finite parametrizations identifies a compactly supported top-form integral on an oriented manifold with the sum of pullback integrals over finitely many orientation-preserving patches whose interiors are disjoint and whose closures cover the support.

[F10]

Unit-sphere area form and outward radial flux defines the outward area form ωu(v,w)=u⋅(v×w) on S2 and computes ∫S2ω=4π.

[F11]

Local two-form potentials and global obstruction says that a smooth closed form with a nonzero period on a smooth singular cycle cannot be globally exact.

[F12]

Change of variables for an injective C1 map on a compact Jordan set applies to an injective C1 map on an open Euclidean set with invertible derivative and a compact Jordan subset. For the coordinate swap R(u,v)=(v,u) on the standard closed parameter triangle K={u,v≥0:u+v≤1}, R(K)=K and det⁡DR=−1. Thus, for a continuous two-form h(u,v) du∧dv near K, its pullback by R has integral −∫Kh.

[F13]

A bounded set in Rm is Jordan measurable iff its boundary is null, equivalently of content zero makes a bounded set with content-zero boundary Jordan measurable; the boundary of K consists of three line segments and has two-dimensional content zero. A continuous real function on a compact Jordan measurable set is Riemann integrable over that set makes each continuous coefficient integrable on K. Changing a bounded integrand on a content-zero set does not change its Riemann integral permits setting it to zero on ∂K without changing its integral. The zero-extension definition in The Riemann integral of a bounded function over a bounded Jordan measurable set then identifies that value with its integral on K∘.

Verification

1.1F1F2givenalgebra

Put s=x2+y2+z2>0. Repeated application of the positive-base power rule in [F2] gives derivatives of every order of u−1/2 and u−3/2 on u>0; the chain and product rules then show that q(p)=ps−1/2 and every coefficient of β are smooth on N. Writing X=(x,y,z)/r3, the coordinate formula in [F1] gives dβ=(∂x(xr−3)+∂y(yr−3)+∂z(zr−3)) dx∧dy∧dz. By [F2], ∂x(xr−3)=r−3−3x2r−5, with the analogous formulas for y,z; their sum is 3r−3−3(x2+y2+z2)r−5=0. Thus dβ=0 throughout N.

2.1F2F3F7givenstep 1.1algebra

The edge matrix with columns v1−v0=(0,−2,−2), v2−v0=(−2,0,−2) and v3−v0=(−2,−2,0) has determinant −16. Since v0+v1+v2+v3=0, the origin has strictly positive barycentric coordinates and lies in the interior of T. Each face avoids it, so step 1.1 supplies smooth extensions of qσj near Δ2. The ordered tetrahedron has negative orientation; its outward boundary therefore has coefficients −(−1)j=cj on the ordered faces σj. In the formal signed boundary of ∑jcjσj, every ordered edge occurs twice with opposite coefficients: deleting indices i<j in either order changes the boundary sign by −1. Composing these identical edge maps with ιq preserves their equality, so ∂z=0 by [F3]. This uses no extension of q across the origin.

2.2F2F6F7F10givenstep 1.1algebra

A ray from the interior point 0 meets the compact convex tetrahedron in an interval [0,tu] with tu>0 and meets its boundary only at tuu. Hence q:∂T→S2 is bijective. On a face n⋅p=h with outward unit normal n, h>0 and the inverse is u↦hu/(n⋅u); it is smooth on the spherical face interior, where n⋅u>0. These interiors give disjoint open patches whose closures cover S2. For any tangent vectors v,w at p∈N, Dqp(v)=(v−(q⋅v)q)/∥p∥2; expanding the cross product gives q⋅(Dqp(v)×Dqp(w))=p⋅(v×w)/∥p∥23=βp(v,w). Thus q∗ω=β on N, and ι∗β=ω on S2. For positively oriented face vectors the displayed value is positive, because p⋅(v×w)=hn⋅(v×w)>0. Hence radial projection preserves the outward face orientation.

3.1F4F5F8F9F10F12F13step 2.1step 2.2algebra

In the positive affine coordinates on Δ2, write Gj=qσj on K. The orientation sign of Gj is cj by steps 2.1–2.2. Set Hj=Gj when cj=1 and Hj=Gj∘R when cj=−1, with R as in [F12]. Each Hj is smooth near K and restricts on its interior to an orientation-preserving diffeomorphism onto its spherical face patch. By [F12], ∫KHj∗ω=cj∫KGj∗ω in both cases. The simplex definition [F5], the pullback identity in step 2.2, and the finite signed sum [F4] give ∫zβ=∑jcj∫KGj∗ω=∑j∫KHj∗ω. The parameter triangles are compact Jordan sets; their edges have content zero, and the smooth pullback coefficients are bounded, so their closed-triangle integrals equal the open-interior integrals by [F13]. Compact support follows from [F8]; the four patches satisfy [F9], yielding ∫zβ=∫S2ω=4π by [F10].

4.1F11step 1.1step 3.1∎

Step 3.1 gives ∫zβ=4π≠0. Since step 1.1 proved dβ=0, [F11] makes β nonexact on the punctured domain.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels