Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Exponential growth of the Nyquist mode above the CFL bound

Physical scope

An exact mathematical failure mode of the scalar benchmark above its stated time-step bound; no Einstein solver or physical evolution is asserted.

Statement

Let N≥4 be even, let h=2π/N, and choose the Courant--Friedrichs--Lewy (CFL) step ratio λ:=k/h>1. Run the periodic wave algorithm with uj0=(−1)j and vj0=0, with any integer nmax⁡≥1. For every integer 0≤n≤nmax⁡ the output has the form ujn=an(−1)j, where, with c:=1−2λ2<−1,

an=zgrown+zdecayn2,zgrow:=c−c2−1<−1,zdecay:=c+c2−1∈(−1,0).

Consequently ∣an∣≥∣zgrow∣n/2, so allowing more time steps causes exponential growth of this alternating mode. The strict hypothesis 0<k/h<1 in the preceding mode theorem excludes this example; no endpoint claim at k/h=1 is made here.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An even integer N≥4, the benchmark step ratio λ>1, and the real initial arrays uj0=(−1)j, vj0=0.

[F1]

A finite periodic scalar-wave benchmark: the initialization and periodic update are u1=u0+kv0+(k2/2)Dhu0 and un+1=2un−un−1+k2Dhun.

[F2]

Termination and operation count of the periodic wave benchmark: for every finite nmax⁡ the algorithm outputs every level through unmax⁡.

[F3]

Fourier-mode stability of the periodic leapfrog benchmark: the preceding unit-circle result assumes 0<k/h<1 and makes no claim for k/h>1.

[F4]
[F5]

Absolute value in an ordered field: for real x, ∣x∣=x if x≥0 and ∣x∣=−x if x<0.

[F6]

Basic properties of the absolute value: ∣x∣≥0, ∣x∣=0 exactly when x=0, and ∣xy∣=∣x∣∣y∣ for real x,y.

Verification

Given: The even periodic grid, the stated time-step ratio, and the alternating initial array.

1.1givenF1F3algebra

Because N is even, both periodic neighbors of (−1)j equal −(−1)j. Hence (Dhu0)j=−4h−2(−1)j, and the startup in [F1] gives a0=1 and a1=1−2(k/h)2=c. This mode has index ℓ=N/2; it is outside the strict range of [F3].

2.1givenF1F4step 1.1algebra

Substitution of ujn=an(−1)j into the update [F1] gives an+1−2can+an−1=0. Since c<−1, [F4] supplies r=c2−1>0. The two roots zgrow=c−r and zdecay=c+r satisfy zgrowzdecay=1; also zgrow<−1 and zdecay=1/zgrow∈(−1,0).

3.1step 1.1step 2.1F1F2F5F6algebra∎

The sequence (zgrown+zdecayn)/2 satisfies the recurrence because each root satisfies z2−2cz+1=0, and its values at n=0,1 are 1,c. Induction identifies it with an. For even n the two powers are nonnegative, and for odd n they are both negative; since 1/2>0, their half-sum has the same sign. The piecewise definition [F5] therefore gives ∣an∣=(∣zgrown∣+∣zdecayn∣)/2, while induction using multiplicativity [F6] gives ∣zgrown∣=∣zgrow∣n and ∣zdecayn∣=∣zdecay∣n. Since zgrow<−1, [F5] gives ∣zgrow∣=−zgrow>1, while ∣zdecay∣n≥0 by [F6]; hence ∣an∣≥∣zgrow∣n/2.

Diagram

The following N=8 picture illustrates the periodic alternating data; the last edge identifies the two ends of the grid. The proof above uses the recurrence and applies to every even N≥4; the drawing is not a proof.

+1¡1+1¡1+1¡1+1¡1

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources