Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Explicit isotropic-to-areal conversion and the second-order scalar-coefficient comparison of the Schwarzschild exterior

Example

Let (M,g,N) be the Schwarzschild exterior datum with Schwarzschild radius s>0, f(r)=1−s/r and g11=1/f (The Schwarzschild exterior model datum: domain, metric, mass parameter and time orientation, The Schwarzschild exterior datum is a smooth time-oriented Lorentzian four-manifold). Let

R(ρ):=ρ(1+s4ρ)2,ρ>s4,

be the isotropic-to-areal radius map of The isotropic coordinate form of the Schwarzschild exterior metric and the isothermal radius shift and let ρ0:(s,∞)→(s/4,∞) be its inverse, so that the isotropic coefficient of the spatial metric is the function ρ↦(1+s/(4ρ))4 and the areal coefficient is r↦(1−s/r)−1. The two displayed functions are coefficients in different radial bases. The following scalar-function comparisons do not identify their tensor components after a change of basis; that transformation is included in clause 5.

  1. Exact form and positivity. R(ρ)=ρ+s2+s216ρ and R′(ρ)=1−s216ρ2>0 on (s/4,∞); the inverse is ρ0(r)=(r−s2)+r(r−s)2.

  2. Conversion and areal expansion. With ρ=ρ0(r), ρ0(r)=r−s2−s216r+O ⁣(s3r2),1ρ0(r)=1r+s2r2+O ⁣(s2r3). These are expansions as r/s→∞ with fixed s>0. The areal coefficient satisfies, exactly for r>s, (1−s/r)−1=1+sr+(s/r)21−s/r, so its expansion is 1+sr+s2r2+O ⁣(s3r3).

  3. Isotropic coefficient after argument substitution. With ρ=ρ0(r) one has s4ρ0(r)=s4r+s28r2+O(s3/r3) and (1+s4ρ0(r))4=1+sr+78s2r2+O ⁣(s3r3). Hence these scalar functions agree through first order and differ at second order by 18s2r2.

  4. Failure of the unconverted comparison. Evaluating the isotropic coefficient at ρ=r instead of at ρ=ρ0(r) gives (1+s4r)4=1+sr+38s2r2+O ⁣(s3r3), which differs from the areal coefficient of clause 2 by 58s2r2 at second order: the consistency of the leading Newtonian-type term is unaffected, but the comparison of coefficients in the unchanged chart is already wrong at relative order (s/r)2.

  5. Radial tensor transformation. Put a(r)=s/(4ρ0(r)). Differentiating R(ρ0(r))=r gives ρ0′(r)=(1−a(r)2)−1. Consequently the radial coefficient in the areal basis is exactly grr=(1+a(r))4(ρ0′(r))2=(1−s/r)−1. Moreover (ρ0′)2=1+s2/(8r2)+O(s3/r3), so this coefficient is 1+s/r+s2/r2+O(s3/r3): the apparent 1/8 discrepancy of clause 3 disappears when the basis is transformed.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The exterior datum with Schwarzschild radius s>0, the functions R, ρ0, the areal coefficient 1/f and the isotropic coefficient (1+s/(4ρ))4.

[L1]

R(ρ)=ρ(1+s/(4ρ))2 is a smooth bijection of (s/4,∞) onto (s,∞) with smooth inverse ρ0(r)=(r−s/2)+r(r−s)2, R′(ρ)=1−s2/(16ρ2)>0, the exact algebraic identity R(ρ)=ρ+s2+s216ρ, and the asymptotic expansion ρ0(r)=r−s2−s216r+O(s3/r2) for fixed s>0 as r/s→∞ (The isotropic coordinate form of the Schwarzschild exterior metric and the isothermal radius shift clauses (a) and (c), The derivative f′(c)=lim⁡x→cf(x)−f(c)x−c of f:A→R at a point c∈A that is a limit point of A, and differentiability on a set, Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: (f+g)′(c)=f′(c)+g′(c), (αf)′(c)=αf′(c), (fg)′(c)=f′(c)g(c)+f(c)g′(c), and (f/g)′(c)=(f′(c)g(c)−f(c)g′(c))/g(c)2 when g(c)≠0, Rational powers ar of a positive base).

[L3]

In the isotropic chart of the datum the spatial coefficient is gρρ=(1+s/(4ρ))4 and in a spherical-polar product chart g11=(1−s/r)−1 (The isotropic coordinate form of the Schwarzschild exterior metric and the isothermal radius shift clause (b), The Schwarzschild exterior datum is a smooth time-oriented Lorentzian four-manifold clause (a), The Schwarzschild exterior model datum: domain, metric, mass parameter and time orientation clause (c)).

[L5]

The chain rule for differentiable functions on open real intervals gives R′(ρ0(r))ρ0′(r)=1 from R∘ρ0=id (The chain rule, in one line from Carathéodory: if g is differentiable at c and f is differentiable at g(c), then f∘g is differentiable at c with (f∘g)′(c)=f′(g(c)) g′(c)); the radial term of the metric in [L3] is (1+s/(4ρ))4dρ2, so dρ=ρ0′(r)dr in the areal chart.

Proof

technique · use the inverse-radius expansion proved in the isotropic-coordinate lemma, expand the reciprocal and fourth power with explicit remainders, and compare the coefficients after the coordinate conversion
1.1L1algebra

(Exact form and inverse.) By [L1], R(ρ)=ρ+s2+s216ρ, so R′(ρ)=1−s216ρ2, which is positive exactly because ρ2>s2/16, that is ρ>s/4; [L1] also gives the displayed inverse ρ0, and the identity R(ρ0(r))=r holds on (s,∞). This is clause 1.

1.2L1algebra

(Expansion of the inverse.) By [L1], for fixed s>0 and r/s→∞, ρ0(r)=r−s2−s216r+O ⁣(s3r2). Write ρ0(r)=r(1+δ(r)), where δ(r)=−s/(2r)−s2/(16r2)+O(s3/r3)=O(s/r). For all sufficiently large r/s, ∣δ(r)∣≤1/2, and the exact identity (1+δ)−1=1−δ+δ2/(1+δ) gives 1ρ0(r)=1r+s2r2+O ⁣(s2r3). All remainder estimates here are for fixed s>0 and r/s→∞. This proves the two expansions of clause 2.

1.3L2L4algebra

(Areal expansion.) For r>s the identity (1−s/r)−1=1+s/r1−s/r=1+sr+(s/r)21−s/r is exact by [L2]; since 0<s/r<1 by [L4], the last term is positive and satisfies (s/r)21−s/r=(s/r)2(1+O(s/r)), so (1−s/r)−1=1+sr+s2r2+O(s3/r3) with remainder at most s3/r31−s/r, which is O(s3/r3) on r≥2s. This is the second display of clause 2.

2.1step 1.2L3L4algebra

(Isotropic coefficient after conversion.) By step 1.2, s4ρ0(r)=s4r+s28r2+O(s3/r3), so with x:=s4ρ0(r), [L4] gives (1+x)4=1+4x+6x2+O(x3), hence (1+x)4=1+sr+s22r2+6s216r2+O(s3/r3)=1+sr+78s2r2+O(s3/r3). Combining with step 1.3, the two coefficients agree in their constant and 1/r terms and differ in their 1/r2 terms by 18s2r2; this is clause 3.

2.2step 1.3L3L4algebra

(Unconverted comparison.) Evaluating at ρ=r gives x=s4r and by [L4] (1+s4r)4=1+sr+6s216r2+O(s3/r3)=1+sr+38s2r2+O(s3/r3); subtracting the areal expansion of step 1.3 termwise gives the mismatch (1−38)s2r2=58s2r2 at second order, while the constant and first-order terms continue to agree. This is clause 4 as a comparison of scalar coefficient functions, not a metric transformation.

3.1L1L3L5step 1.2step 1.3step 2.1algebra∎

(Transforming the radial basis.) By [L1] and [L5], ρ0′=1/(1−a2) with 0<a<1. Since f(r)=(1−a)2/(1+a)2 for r=R(ρ0(r)), the transformed radial coefficient is (1+a)4/(1−a2)2=(1+a)2/(1−a)2=f(r)−1. Step 1.2 gives a2=s2/(16r2)+O(s3/r3); for u=a2, the exact remainder identity (1−u)−2−1−2u=u2(3−2u)/(1−u)2 gives (ρ0′)2=1+s2/(8r2)+O(s3/r3). Multiplication by the expansion of step 2.1 changes its second-order coefficient from 7/8 to 7/8+1/8=1, exactly as in step 1.3. This proves clause 5.

Remarks

  • What the example checks. The computation is exact finite algebra with remainder bounds as r/s→∞: after argument substitution alone, the second-order isotropic coefficient is 1/2+3/8=7/8, where 1/2 comes from the coordinate shift in 1/ρ0 and 3/8 from the fourth-power expansion. The areal coefficient has second-order coefficient 1, so their difference is 1/8; the O(s2/r3) remainder of 1/ρ0 contributes only at third order. The radial tensor coefficient additionally includes the squared Jacobian of clause 5 and agrees exactly with the areal coefficient. No numerical value of s, no observed system and no measurement occurs.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources