Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The Schwarzschild exterior datum is a smooth time-oriented Lorentzian four-manifold

Statement

Let c>0, GN>0, m∗>0 and let (M,g,N) be the Schwarzschild exterior datum of mass parameter m∗ with Schwarzschild radius s=2GNm∗/c2 (The Schwarzschild exterior model datum: domain, metric, mass parameter and time orientation). Then:

(a) Global metric and local components. M is a smooth four-manifold without boundary and g is the smooth symmetric covariant 2-tensor field globally defined by

g=−f d(x0)⊗d(x0)+f−1 dr⊗dr+r2 ι∗γS2.

In every spherical-polar product chart (x0,r,ϑ,φ) its components are

g00=−f(r),g11=1f(r),g22=r2,g33=r2sin⁡2ϑ,gab=0 (a≠b),

where f(r)=1−s/r, ι:M→S2 is the third projection and γS2 is the round metric of the unit sphere. The component display is local to the spherical-polar charts; the global tensor formula includes the poles.

(b) Lorentzian signature. At every p∈M the form gp is nondegenerate with inertia (3,1,0); consequently (M,g,N) is a smooth Lorentzian four-manifold of signature (−,+,+,+).

(c) Time orientation. The global product field N=∂0 is smooth and nowhere vanishing, and gp(Np,Np)=−f(r(p))<0 at every p; it is therefore a time orientation of (M,g). The globally defined base fields ∂0,∂r are orthogonal with squared norms −f and f−1. In a spherical-polar chart the angular coordinate fields are orthogonal with positive squared norms r2 and r2sin⁡2ϑ; at a pole use any angular chart and the positive-definite round metric instead.

(d) Domain of the coordinates. Product charts form an atlas covering M. Spherical-polar charts are defined on the regular angular locus 0<ϑ<π and omit the poles; pole charts are ordinary smooth charts of S2. The functions f and f−1 are smooth on r>s, and the spherical-polar component functions are smooth on their chart domains.

(e) Conventions. The global tensor identity holds on all of M; the displayed component identities are in spherical-polar product charts. In pole charts the sphere block is r2 times the round-metric component matrix.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Constants c>0, GN>0, m∗>0, the Schwarzschild radius s=2GNm∗/c2, the product manifold M=R×(s,∞)×S2, the assignments of clause (c) of The Schwarzschild exterior model datum: domain, metric, mass parameter and time orientation in product charts, and the field N=∂0.

[L1]

The metric is globally g=−f d(x0)⊗d(x0)+f−1 dr⊗dr+r2ι∗γS2; on the dense regular angular locus its spherical-polar components are g00=−f(r), g11=f(r)−1, g22=r2, g33=r2sin⁡2ϑ and all mixed components vanish. The round metric is smooth and positive definite also at the two poles; f(r)=1−s/r is smooth and strictly positive on (s,∞) (The Schwarzschild exterior model datum: domain, metric, mass parameter and time orientation clauses (b)-(c), The round metric on the sphere as an induced metric).

[L2]

M carries the product smooth structure: it is a Hausdorff, second-countable smooth four-manifold without boundary, and its smooth atlas is generated by products of charts of the factors; the projections x0, r, ι are smooth (Products of smooth manifolds have a canonical product smooth structure, Smooth manifolds and their smooth charts, Euclidean spheres and closed balls as subspaces of Rn, Cr and smooth maps between smooth manifolds).

[L3]

A covariant 2-tensor field is a family of bilinear forms whose components in every chart are C∞; specifying a symmetric matrix of component functions in the charts of one atlas defines a smooth symmetric covariant 2-tensor field when the assigned components transform by the covariant 2-tensor law on overlaps (Smooth covariant 2-tensor fields on a smooth manifold, Chart independence and the transformation law of a smooth covariant 2-tensor field).

[L4]

A smooth symmetric covariant 2-tensor field g on a smooth four-manifold M is a Lorentzian metric of signature (−,+,+,+) when gp is nondegenerate and has inertia (3,1,0) at every p, that is, some (equivalently every) basis of TpM diagonalizing gp has exactly one negative and three positive diagonal entries (Smooth time-oriented Lorentzian four-manifolds: the geometric objects of the model clause (a), Lorentz forms of inertia (3,1,0) on a 4-dimensional real vector space); a smooth vector field N with gp(Np,Np)<0 for every p is a time orientation (Smooth time-oriented Lorentzian four-manifolds: the geometric objects of the model clause (c)).

[L5]

On the overlap of two smooth charts, coordinates and component functions of a smooth tensor transform by the chain rule; in particular the transition maps of the standard spherical atlas of S2 are smooth and the round metric components transform as a (0,2)-tensor (Chart independence and the transformation law of a smooth covariant 2-tensor field, Coordinate derivations form a basis of the tangent space, Cr and smooth maps between smooth manifolds).

[L6]

The functions sin⁡ϑ and sin⁡2ϑ are smooth on 0<ϑ<π and strictly positive there; r2, r4sin⁡2ϑ, f(r) and f(r)−1 are smooth and positive on the ranges stated (Rational powers ar of a positive base, Intervals of R: the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length).

Proof

technique · use the global pullback formula, the product tangent-space splitting and positive definiteness of the round metric
1.1L1L2L3L5L6algebra

(Global smooth tensor.) The product manifold atlas covers M, including charts about both sphere poles, by [L2]. The projections x0,r,ι are smooth, f and f−1 are smooth on r>s, and γS2 is a smooth covariant tensor on all of S2 by [L1]-[L3]. Therefore each term of the coordinate-free expression in [L1] is a smooth tensor field on M, their sum is a smooth symmetric covariant 2-tensor field, and on the regular angular locus its polar components are the display of clause (a). By [L5], smooth changes of angular coordinates re-express this same tensor by the covariant component transformation law in the corresponding coordinate bases, including pole charts. This proves the global assertion and the chart-local statement.

1.2L1L4algebra

(Nondegeneracy and inertia, including the poles.) At p=(x0,r,ω) the product tangent space splits as TpM≅R⊕R⊕TωS2. For v=(a,b,w) in this splitting, gp(v,v)=−f(r)a2+f(r)−1b2+r2γS2,ω(w,w). Here f(r)>0, and γS2,ω is positive definite at every sphere point, including the poles. The first two summands thus have one negative and one positive direction, and the sphere summand has two positive directions; gp is nondegenerate with inertia (3,1,0) at every p. This proves (b).

2.1L1L4step 1.2algebra

(Time orientation.) The product field N=∂0 is smooth and nowhere zero. By [L1] and the global metric formula, g(N,N)=−f(r)<0 everywhere, so N is a time orientation. The base-vector signs and the polar angular signs in (c) follow from that formula and the positive-definite round metric.

3.1step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1given∎

(Conclusion.) Step 1.1 proves (a), step 1.2 proves (b) at all sphere points, and step 2.1 proves (c). Clauses (d)-(e) record the polar-chart domain of the component display and the global scope of the tensor formula. No property outside r>s is asserted.

Remarks

  • Why the poles cause no degeneracy. The global product tangent-space splitting separates the Lorentzian time-radial block from the positive round metric on S2. Polar coordinates are only a local component display; their failure at the poles does not affect the metric or its inertia.

  • No extension is claimed. The product-chart frame remains a basis at every point with r>s, while its component g11=f−1 diverges as r↓s. The chart has no point at r=s, so it has no frame limit there; this lemma asserts nothing at that boundary. The extension and Kruskal items of this page study the metric there in different charts.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources