Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The Gaussian ground state: position and momentum laws and the saturated bound

Physical scope

The ground state of the one-dimensional oscillator model: its explicit Gaussian representative, its position and momentum outcome laws with means zero and variances l^2/2 and hbar^2/(2l^2), and the saturation of the model's position-momentum relation in the ground preparation. The example is a conditional computation inside the adopted model and asserts no measured distribution, no apparatus realisation and no empirical value.

Example

Adopt the state and composition postulate P1, the observable and probability postulate P2 and the kinematics and massive-particle model postulate P5, read through the one-dimensional oscillator model of The quadratic-potential oscillator model of the framework clauses (a), (b), (c), and assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). Let ψ0 be the ground eigenvector of the model's energy operator H1, let ℓ=ℏ/(mω), and let Q, P be the model's position and momentum observables. Then:

(a) the class ψ0 has the representative ψ0(x)=ℓ−1/2π−1/4e−x2/(2ℓ2), it is a unit vector, it is the model's coherent state of label 0, and H1ψ0=ℏω2ψ0;

(b) the position outcome law of the assigned observable (Q,m) in the ground preparation has the density f(x)=ℓ−1π−1/2e−x2/ℓ2, with ∫Rf=1, mean 0 and second moment ℓ2/2; hence Δψ0Q=ℓ/2;

(c) the momentum outcome law of the assigned observable (P,kg m s−1) has the density g(p)=ℓℏπe−ℓ2p2/ℏ2, with ∫Rg=1, mean 0 and second moment ℏ2/(2ℓ2); hence Δψ0P=ℏ/(ℓ2);

(d) consequently Δψ0Q Δψ0P=ℏ/2: the ground preparation is one of the coherent preparations of Fluctuations of the oscillator coherent states and the position-momentum relation of the model, and it saturates the model's position-momentum relation;

(e) the computation is one preparation of the adopted model; it identifies no measured distribution with f or g and no laboratory state with the ground state.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the model of The quadratic-potential oscillator model of the framework with parameters m,ω,ℏ>0, length ℓ=ℏ/(mω), energy operator H1, eigenbasis (ψn) and ground vector ψ0; the operators Q and P with their domains.

[F1]

The ground vector from the scaling theorem. With g0(y)=π−1/4e−y2/2 and D the scaling unitary of Oscillator scaling and exact realization, one has ψ0=Dg0, ψ0(x)=ℓ−1/2g0(x/ℓ)=ℓ−1/2π−1/4e−x2/(2ℓ2), ∥ψ0∥=1, and H1ψ0=ℏω2ψ0; moreover ψ0=Ψ0 is the coherent state of label 0 (Oscillator scaling and exact realization clauses (a), (b); Hermite recurrence clause (a); The coherent states of the oscillator model clause (c); The energy observable of the oscillator model: spectrum, eigenbasis and outcome law clause (a)).

[F2]

The position law. (Q,m) is an assigned sharp observable of the model with Q=Mx on D(Q)={f:xf∈L2} and law μψQ(B)=∥EQ(B)ψ∥2; for the real multiplier m(x)=x on the σ-finite space (R,Lebesgue) the assignment E(B)=M1x−1(B) is the spectral projection-valued measure of Mx and ∥E(B)ψ∥2=∫x−1(B)∣ψ∣2 dx (The quadratic-potential oscillator model of the framework clause (b); Assigned sharp observables and the outcome law of the framework clause (b); Spectral measure of a real L2 multiplication operator clauses (b), (c)).

[F3]

Heat kernel and its moments. For t>0 and n=1, Γ(x,t)=(4πt)−1/2e−x2/(4t) satisfies ∫Γ(x,t)dx=1, and all first and second moments are absolutely integrable with ∫xΓ(x,t)dx=0 and ∫x2Γ(x,t)dx=2t (The heat kernel on Rn and its causal extension, Normalisation, parabolic scaling, heat equation and derivative bounds for the heat kernel clause (i), First and second Gaussian heat-kernel moments).

[F4]

The momentum law. F2(Pψ)(ξ)=2πℏ ξ F2ψ(ξ) for ψ∈D(P), and D(P)={ψ:ξF2ψ∈L2}; with g(ξ):=2πℏξ and Mg the multiplication operator on L2(R,dξ) one has P=F2−1MgF2 with D(P)=F2−1D(Mg), so by the transport lemma the spectral projection-valued measure of P is EP(B)=F2−1EMg(B)F2 and, for a unit ψ, μψP(B)=∥EMg(B)F2ψ∥2; the multiplication lemma applied to Mg gives EMg(B)=M1g−1(B) and μψP(B)=∫g−1(B)∣F2ψ(ξ)∣2 dξ (Componentwise position and momentum operators on the component-valued wave-function space clause (b) at d=1, r=1; Transport of spectral projection-valued measures along isometric bijections clauses (b), (c); Spectral measure of a real L2 multiplication operator clauses (b), (c)).

[F5]

Gaussian Fourier transform and linear change of variables. F2(e−πtx2)(ξ)=t−1/2e−πξ2/t for t>0 (Euclidean Gaussian transform with the 2π normalization); and for the C1 diffeomorphism T(ξ)=2πℏξ of R and h∈L1, ∫Rh(p) dp=∫Rh(2πℏξ) 2πℏ dξ, so ∫Rh(2πℏξ) dξ=(2πℏ)−1∫Rh(p) dp (A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for L^1 functions).

[F6]

Means, variances and spreads. For an assigned sharp observable (A,uA) and a unit vector ψ∈D(A) the outcome-law mean and second moment exist and equal ⟨Aψ,ψ⟩ and ∥Aψ∥2, and the preparation spread is the square root of the outcome-law variance ∫(λ−m)2dμψA; for the coherent preparations of the model the identity ΔQ ΔP=ℏ/2 is known (Mean, second moment and variance of an assigned observable in a preparation clauses (a), (b); Preparation variance and spread of an assigned sharp observable clauses (b), (c); Fluctuations of the oscillator coherent states and the position-momentum relation of the model clause (a)).

Verification

Given: the data of the Example and [F1]-[F6].

1.1givenF1

[The ground vector] By [F1], ψ0=Dg0 with g0(y)=π−1/4e−y2/2, so its representative is ψ0(x)=ℓ−1/2π−1/4e−x2/(2ℓ2) and ∥ψ0∥=∥g0∥=1 because D is an isometry; H1ψ0=ℏω2ψ0 and ψ0=Ψ0 are also from [F1].

1.2givenF1F2

[The position law] By [F2] and [F1], for every Borel B⊆R the position law of the ground preparation is μψ0Q(B)=∫x−1(B)∣ψ0(x)∣2dx=∫Bℓ−1π−1/2e−x2/ℓ2dx, so f(x)=ℓ−1π−1/2e−x2/ℓ2 is its density, with ∫f=1 because ∣ψ0∣2 is a probability density.

1.3givenF4F5

[The momentum law] By [F4] and [F5], for every Borel B the momentum law is μψ0P(B)=∫g−1(B)∣F2ψ0(ξ)∣2dξ=∫B(2πℏ)−1∣F2ψ0(p/(2πℏ))∣2dp, using the substitution p=2πℏξ in the second step; hence the density is g(p)=(2πℏ)−1∣F2ψ0(p/(2πℏ))∣2.

1.4givenF1F5algebra

[The Fourier transform of the ground vector] By [F5] applied with t=1/(2πℓ2), F2(e−x2/(2ℓ2))(ξ)=(12πℓ2)−1/2e−2π2ℓ2ξ2=2π ℓ e−2π2ℓ2ξ2, so by [F1] F2ψ0(ξ)=ℓ−1/2π−1/42π ℓ e−2π2ℓ2ξ2=2π ℓ1/2π−1/4e−2π2ℓ2ξ2 and ∣F2ψ0(ξ)∣2=2πℓπ−1/2e−4π2ℓ2ξ2=2π ℓ e−4π2ℓ2ξ2.

2.1step 1.1

[Clause (a)] By step 1.1 the ground vector has the displayed representative, is a unit vector, equals Ψ0, and satisfies H1ψ0=ℏω2ψ0.

2.2step 1.2F3

[Clause (b)] By step 1.2 the position density is f(x)=ℓ−1π−1/2e−x2/ℓ2, which equals the heat kernel Γ(x,ℓ2/4); by [F3] it integrates to 1, and its mean and second moment are those of Γ(⋅,ℓ2/4): ∫xf=0 and ∫x2f=2⋅ℓ24=ℓ22.

2.3step 1.3step 1.4F3

[Clause (c)] By steps 1.3 and 1.4, g(p)=(2πℏ)−1⋅2π ℓ e−4π2ℓ2(p/(2πℏ))2=(2πℏ)−12π ℓ e−ℓ2p2/ℏ2=ℓℏπe−ℓ2p2/ℏ2, which equals the heat kernel Γ(p,ℏ2/(4ℓ2)); by [F3] it integrates to 1 and has mean 0 and second moment 2⋅ℏ24ℓ2=ℏ22ℓ2.

3.1step 2.2step 2.3F6

[Clause (d)] By steps 2.2 and 2.3 the ground preparation has position variance ℓ2/2 and momentum variance ℏ2/(2ℓ2), so by [F6] its spreads are Δψ0Q=ℓ/2 and Δψ0P=ℏ/(ℓ2) with product ℏ/2; by [F6] this is the value of the coherent preparations, and by Fluctuations of the oscillator coherent states and the position-momentum relation of the model it is the minimum of the spread product over the common domain.

4.1step 3.1given∎

[Clause (e)] The computation used only the model's ground vector, the multiplication and Fourier forms of the model's position and momentum observables and the Gaussian heat-kernel facts; no measured distribution, apparatus or empirical value entered.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources