How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Finite square well: an exactly solvable bound state and exact bound-state counts
Finite checks in the declared line model of the pair for the finite square well: an exactly solvable depth at which the unique bound state has energy minus one half of the depth, and exact bound-state counts and branch parities for declared depths. The example is a conditional computation in the model; it reports no measurement, no material well and no empirical value, and asserts no conclusion about nature.
Example
Work in the declared line model The declared one-dimensional line model: state space, Hamiltonian, bound states and generalized stationary solutions with mass parameter and action constant , energies, lengths and the depth read in the units of Dimensions, SI unit conventions and quantity types of the framework, and consider the finite square well for , for of Finite square well: bound-state conditions, simplicity and count with half-width and depth .
(i) Exact boundary case of the first branch. Declare Then , the count parameter is , there is exactly one bound state, it is an even (cosine-type) state, and its binding energy is exactly For this declared depth the root of the even condition is exactly .
(ii) Exact counts at declared depths. With one has and , so there are exactly three bound states, with types even, odd and even in order of increasing energy. With one has and exactly one bound state; with one has and exactly two bound states. For every declared depth there is at least one bound state.
(iii) Rational bracket of the first case. so the count equals one in case (i).
The example is a conditional computation in the declared well model and asserts no measured binding energy; the identities in (i) and (ii) are exact in the model at the displayed declared data.
Verification
Proof technique: direct; verify the exact root condition at the declared depth using the special value , read the count and branch criterion from the finite-well theorem with exact rational comparisons, and bracket the count parameter by rationals.
Given: The line model and the finite-well theorem Finite square well: bound-state conditions, simplicity and count; half-width , mass , action ; the depths declared in (i) and (ii).
[F1] Finite-well conclusions. For every the assigned well operator is self-adjoint, its negative eigenvalues are exactly the numbers whose parameters , satisfy or , each such eigenvalue is simple with the stated parity of the eigenfunction, there are no eigenvalues outside , the count is with , the solutions lie one in each branch whose left endpoint satisfies and nowhere else, and the types alternate with the parity of (Finite square well: bound-state conditions, simplicity and count clauses (a)-(c)).
[F2] Special value of the tangent. : by Cofunction, supplementary, quarter-turn, and reflection identities for the six trigonometric functions, ; by Pi is the first positive zero of sine, ; applying the half-angle identity of Half-angle identities with the sign determined by the quadrant at , where and by Quarter-turn values and shifts by pi/2 and pi, gives ; hence by Tangent, cotangent, secant, and cosecant on their exact natural domains and the positivity of .
[F3] Rational order. For positive integers, iff , and ; if and then .
[First case: data and root] With one has , hence . Put ; then , and by [F2], so the even condition of [F1] holds with . By [F1] this is a simple eigenvalue with an even eigenfunction.
[Second case: three states] With one has , so and . The admissible branches are those with left endpoint , i.e. ; by [F3] this holds exactly for (for , ; for , ), so by [F1] there are exactly three negative eigenvalues, one in each of the branches , with types even, odd, even.
[First case: count] The count parameter is . Since and , [F3] gives ; and . Hence by [F1]; the branch with has left endpoint , while the branch with has left endpoint and because , equivalently , which holds since and . So the unique branch is , the even branch, consistent with step 1.1.
[Thresholds and the ground state] For the count parameter is and the branch is admissible while has left endpoint , not strictly smaller, so exactly one bound state; for the count parameter is and the admissible branches are (left endpoints and ), so exactly two. Since for every and the branch is always admissible, every well with has at least one bound state.
[Bracket and reading] The bracket follows from [F3] because ; hence in case (i) and the count is one. No measured quantity is produced: the identities above are exact relations between the declared model data and the model's binding energies.
Remarks
- Why the first case is exactly solvable. At the declared depth the radius circle of the even root condition passes through the point of the first branch, where , so the transcendental root condition is satisfied by an exact rational multiple of and the signed binding energy is exactly (its positive magnitude is ).
- What the counts show and what they do not. The comparisons verify the branch criterion and the ceiling formula at declared depths. They are not a numerical solution of the transcendental equations at generic depths, do not compare with data and assert nothing about any physical well.
Depends on
Finite square well: bound-state conditions, simplicity and count
The declared one-dimensional line model: state space, Hamiltonian, bound states and generalized stationary solutions
Dimensions, SI unit conventions and quantity types of the framework
Quarter-turn values and shifts by pi/2 and pi
Half-angle identities with the sign determined by the quadrant
Cofunction, supplementary, quarter-turn, and reflection identities for the six trigonometric functions
Pi is the first positive zero of sine
Tangent, cotangent, secant, and cosecant on their exact natural domains
The Axiom of Countable Choice ()
The Axiom of Choice
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Sources
- D. Tong, Quantum Mechanics (author-hosted lecture set), Section 2.3.1, printed pages 42-48 (PDF pages 45-51): the finite well, the even and odd root conditions and the graphical solution count
- J. Binney and D. Skinner, The Physics of Quantum Mechanics, Section 5.1, printed pages 75-79 (PDF pages 83-87): the square well, the condition k tan(ka)=K, the always-present ground state and the count thresholds