Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Ideal single-mode factorial moment

Physical scope

An ideal one-quantum Fock-state calculation of a single-mode normal-ordered factorial statistic and its passive beam-splitter count distribution. This is a conditional finite-mode model prediction, not a detector observation or experimental antibunching dataset.

Example

For the one-mode number state ∣1⟩ and the ideal number-count model, the mean number is ⟨a∗a⟩=1 while the normally ordered second factorial moment is ⟨a∗a∗aa⟩=0, so the assigned g(2)(0) statistic is zero. If the input ∣1,0⟩ is mixed with vacuum at the declared passive beam splitter, its output has exactly one total count, split between the two ports with probabilities η and 1−η. These are model predictions only; no detector realization or experimental antibunching record is asserted.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The number state ∣1⟩, the ideal single-mode count PVM, the vacuum state in the unused port, a passive two-mode unitary with 0≤η≤1, and the assigned finite-mode model.

[A1]

The finite-mode postulate supplies an ideal number-count PVM but makes no claim about a laboratory detector or a measured count record (Finite-mode dipole and detector assignment).

[A2]

Assume AC and ACω as mathematical prerequisites of the finite-mode passive implementer and Fock suppliers; these are set-theoretic assumptions, not physical postulates (The Axiom of Choice, The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F1]

For the declared number distribution, g(2)(0)=∑nn(n−1)pn/(∑nnpn)2 when the denominator is finite and positive (Ideal single-mode normally ordered second factorial statistic).

[F2]

The ladder actions give a∣1⟩=∣0⟩, a∣0⟩=0, a∗a∣1⟩=∣1⟩, and ∣1⟩,∣0⟩ are orthonormal (Fixed-mode number law).

[F3]

A one-quantum input and vacuum at the second port have joint output state t∣1,0⟩+r∣0,1⟩ and ideal count probabilities ∣t∣2=η, ∣r∣2=1−η (Passive beam-splitter photon statistics).

[F4]

Ideal number-count effects are PVM projections with probabilities given by the Born rule; they do not imply a physical device or recorded data (Declared ideal measurements and instruments of the framework).

Proof

1.1A2F2algebra

Since a∣1⟩=∣0⟩ and a∣0⟩=0 by [F2], a∗a∣1⟩=∣1⟩ and a∗a∗aa∣1⟩=0. Thus the denominator mean number is one and the numerator is zero.

2.1F1step 1.1algebra

Substituting these moments into the definition [F1] gives g(2)(0)=0 for this model state. This is a conditional number-statistic calculation, not an observation.

3.1A1A2F3F4algebra∎

With one input quantum and vacuum in the other port, the beam-splitter theorem [F3] gives output t∣1,0⟩+r∣0,1⟩. The PVM events (1,0) and (0,1) are orthogonal and have probabilities η and 1−η by [F4]; the joint event with a count in each port has probability zero. The total output count is exactly one in this assigned model [A1].

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources