Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Fixed-mode number law

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). Let H:=C with its standard inner product (linear in the first argument), let F(C) be its Fock space as in Hilbert direct-sum construction, let en∈F(C) be the unit vector supported in coordinate n (so (en)n∈N is a complete orthonormal family of F(C)), let N be the number operator and let A±(1) be the maximal creation and annihilation operators of Closed adjoint sector domains for the vector 1∈C. Then:

(a) oscillator coefficients: for every n∈N, A+(1)en=n+1 en+1,A−(1)en=n en−1 (n≥1),A−(1)e0=0;

(b) coherent vectors: for every z∈C the series ψz:=e−∣z∣2/2∑n∈Nznn! en converges absolutely in F(C) (The complex exponential by its power series, The complex exponential series converges absolutely for every complex argument), ∥ψz∥=1, ψz∈D(A−(1)) with A−(1)ψz=z ψz, and for all z,w∈C, ⟨ψz,ψw⟩=e−(∣z∣2+∣w∣2)/2+zw‾;

(c) number law: for every n∈N, ∣⟨en,ψz⟩∣2=e−∣z∣2∣z∣2nn!, and ∑n∈N∣⟨en,ψz⟩∣2=1.

The numbers in (c) are squared moduli of overlaps of unit vectors; identifying them with outcome probabilities of a number measurement requires a separately adopted measurement postulate, and no such physical claim is made here.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the one-dimensional Hilbert space C with its standard inner product, the Fock space F(C) with complete orthonormal family (en)n∈N, the maximal operators A±(1) and the number operator N on F(C), and z,w∈C, n∈N.

[F1]

F(C) is a Hilbert space with ⟨em,en⟩=δmn and ∥ψ∥2=∑n∣⟨en,ψ⟩∣2, and it is complete so that every absolutely convergent series converges (Hilbert direct-sum construction).

[F2]

For H=C one has C⊗m=C, P+(m)=id and ran⁡P+(m)=C for every m (Hilbert tensor construction: inner product, completion and product bases, Permutation sector projections on the n-fold tensor power).

[F3]

A±(1) are closed operators. For a finite-sector vector ψ, their coordinate formulas are (A+(1)ψ)0=0, (A+(1)ψ)n=n ψn−1 for n≥1, and (A−(1)ψ)n=n+1 ψn+1 for n≥0, under the identifications of [F2] (Closed adjoint sector domains).

[F5]

The complex exponential satisfies exp⁡(z+w)=exp⁡(z)exp⁡(w) for all complex z,w (exp⁡(z+w)=exp⁡z exp⁡w, and the complex exponential extends the real exponential).

[F4]

For every z∈C the series ∑nzn/n! converges absolutely, so its value exp⁡z is defined and the partial sums of ∑n∣z∣2n/n! converge to exp⁡(∣z∣2) (The complex exponential by its power series, The complex exponential series converges absolutely for every complex argument).

Proof

1.1F2F3algebra

[Oscillator coefficients] For em supported in coordinate m, the raising formula of [F3] has its only nonzero coordinate at m+1, with value m+1, so A+(1)em=m+1em+1. For m≥1 the lowering formula has its only nonzero coordinate at m−1, with value m, so A−(1)em=m em−1; for m=0 every lowering coordinate is zero. This proves (a).

1.2F1F4F5algebra

[Convergence and normalization] Let z∈C and SN:=e−∣z∣2/2∑n≤Nzn/n! en. Orthogonality of the en gives ∥SN−SM∥2=e−∣z∣2∑M<n≤N∣z∣2n/n!, and ∑n∣z∣2n/n!=exp⁡(∣z∣2) by [F4], so (SN) is Cauchy and converges in the complete space F(C) to a vector ψz; moreover ∥ψz∥2=lim⁡N∥SN∥2=e−∣z∣2exp⁡(∣z∣2)=1, so ∥ψz∥=1. For z=0 only the zeroth term survives, so convergence is absolute. For z≠0, convergence is absolute because the ratio of consecutive moduli of ∑n∣z∣n/n! is ∣z∣/n+1→0, so that series converges by the ratio test (Ratio test: lim sup⁡∣ak+1/ak∣<1 gives absolute convergence and hence convergence, and lim inf⁡∣ak+1/ak∣>1 gives divergence); and ∑n∣z∣2n/n!=exp⁡(∣z∣2) is the exponential series of the real number ∣z∣2≥0 ([F4]).

2.1F3step 1.1step 1.2algebra

[Annihilation eigenvalue] Every finite combination SN∈F0 lies in the domain of the closed operator A−(1), and A−(1)SN=e−∣z∣2/2∑1≤n≤Nzn/n!n en−1=z e−∣z∣2/2∑0≤m≤N−1zm/m! em→zψz by step 1.2. Since SN→ψz and A−(1) is closed, ψz∈D(A−(1)) and A−(1)ψz=zψz.

2.2F1F4F5step 1.2algebra

[Overlaps and the number law] For z,w∈C, the series ψz and ψw have absolutely convergent coordinate expansions, so the inner product may be computed termwise: ⟨ψz,ψw⟩=e−(∣z∣2+∣w∣2)/2∑nznwn‾/n!=e−(∣z∣2+∣w∣2)/2+zw‾, the last equality by the exponential series [F4] and its addition law [F5]. In particular ∥ψz∥2=⟨ψz,ψz⟩=e−∣z∣2+∣z∣2=1. Since ∣⟨en,ψz⟩∣2=∣e−∣z∣2/2z‾n/n!∣2=e−∣z∣2∣z∣2n/n! and ∑n∣z∣2n/n!=exp⁡(∣z∣2), the weights in (c) sum to 1.

3.1step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1step 2.2algebra∎

[Conclusion and scope] Steps 1.1-2.2 prove (a), (b) and (c); the square roots n! and n are the positive real roots. The final statement records that no measurement postulate, and hence no probability interpretation of the displayed weights, is asserted; the Fock vectors and the eigenvalue relation are purely mathematical.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources