Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Hilbert direct-sum construction

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). Let H be a complex Hilbert space with inner product linear in the first argument (Hilbert space, Real and complex inner-product spaces and their induced length). Let H⊗0:=C, H⊗1:=H and H⊗(n+1):=H⊗n⊗^H be the completed tensor powers with elementary tensors u1⊗⋯⊗un (Hilbert tensor construction: inner product, completion and product bases); for n≥1 let P+(n)∈B(H⊗n) be the symmetric projection of Permutation sector projections on the n-fold tensor power and set P+(0):=idC. Write ran⁡P+(n) for its range and define

F(H):={ψ=(ψn)n∈N: ψn∈ran⁡P+(n) for all n, ∑n∈N∥ψn∥2<∞}.

Then:

(a) for ψ,φ∈F(H) the scalar series ∑n∈N⟨ψn,φn⟩ converges absolutely and defines a sesquilinear form, linear in the first argument, with respect to which F(H) is a complex vector space with inner product ⟨ψ,φ⟩:=∑n∈N⟨ψn,φn⟩ (Cauchy–Schwarz: ∣⟨x,y⟩∣≤∥x∥ ∥y∥, with equality exactly for dependent pairs, Series and absolute convergence in a normed space);

(b) (F(H),⟨⋅,⋅⟩) is a Hilbert space, i.e. the induced norm is complete (Hilbert space);

(c) the vacuum vector Ω:=(1,0,0,… ) satisfies ∥Ω∥=1, and the finite-particle space F0:={ψ∈F(H):ψn=0 for all but finitely many n} is a dense linear subspace of F(H) (Dense, nowhere dense and codense subsets of a topological space, and the criterion by basic open sets);

(d) for every n the map ιn:ran⁡P+(n)→F(H), ιn(u):=(0,…,0,u,0,… ) (entry in coordinate n) is a linear isometry of ran⁡P+(n) onto the closed subspace of vectors supported in coordinate n;

(e) if H admits a countable complete orthonormal family (ei)i∈I, I at most countable (Orthonormal families, complete orthonormal systems and Hilbert bases), then F(H) is separable (Separability: the existence of an at most countable dense subset);

(f) direct sums of self-adjoint operators: if for every n∈N, including n=0, a self-adjoint operator Tn on the Hilbert space ran⁡P+(n) with domain D(Tn)⊆ran⁡P+(n) is given (so T0 is a self-adjoint operator on C), (Symmetric, self-adjoint and essentially self-adjoint operators, Unbounded linear operators: domain, graph and extension), and

D(T):={ψ∈F(H): ψn∈D(Tn) for all n, ∑n∈N∥Tnψn∥2<∞},(Tψ)n:=Tnψn,

then T is self-adjoint and D(T) is dense; if in addition every Tn is bounded with sup⁡n∥Tn∥<∞, then T is bounded with ∥T∥=sup⁡n∥Tn∥ (A bounded linear operator between normed spaces).

No physical interpretation of F(H), of the tensor powers or of the direct-sum operators is asserted.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the complex Hilbert space H with inner product linear in the first argument, the completed tensor powers H⊗n with symmetric projections P+(n), the set F(H), vectors ψ,φ∈F(H), and, in part (f), self-adjoint operators Tn on ran⁡P+(n).

[F1]

For every n∈N, P+(n) is an orthogonal projection (with P+(0)=idC), so ran⁡P+(n) is a closed linear subspace of the complete space H⊗n; for fixed v∈H⊗m the map u↦u⊗v is linear and bounded (Permutation sector projections on the n-fold tensor power, Hilbert tensor construction: inner product, completion and product bases).

[F2]

Cauchy-Schwarz holds in each sector by Cauchy–Schwarz: ∣⟨x,y⟩∣≤∥x∥ ∥y∥, with equality exactly for dependent pairs. For square-summable scalar sequences, apply that theorem to the finite nonnegative real vectors (∣a0∣,…,∣aN∣) and (∣b0∣,…,∣bN∣) in RN+1 with inner product ⟨a,b⟩:=∑n=0Nanbn, then let N→∞ in the nonnegative partial sums; this gives ∑n∣anbn∣≤(∑n∣an∣2)1/2(∑n∣bn∣2)1/2.

[F3]

A self-adjoint operator is closed and symmetric; a densely defined symmetric operator S satisfies S⊆S∗ (Symmetric, self-adjoint and essentially self-adjoint operators, Adjoint of a densely defined operator, Densely defined, closed and closable operators, and cores).

[F4]

A subset A of a normed space is dense exactly when every vector is the norm limit of a sequence from A (Dense, nowhere dense and codense subsets of a topological space, and the criterion by basic open sets).

Proof

1.1F2algebra

[Absolutely convergent pairing] Let ψ,φ∈F(H). Coordinatewise addition preserves the defining square-summability because ∥ψn+φn∥2≤2∥ψn∥2+2∥φn∥2, and scalar multiplication does as well, so F(H) is a complex vector space. By [F2] with an:=∥ψn∥, bn:=∥φn∥, ∑n∣⟨ψn,φn⟩∣≤∑n∥ψn∥ ∥φn∥≤(∑n∥ψn∥2)1/2(∑n∥φn∥2)1/2=∥ψ∥ ∥φ∥<∞, so the series defining ⟨ψ,φ⟩ converges absolutely (Series and absolute convergence in a normed space); termwise addition and scalar multiplication give sesquilinearity and linearity in the first argument, inherited from the pairings on the H⊗n. If ∥ψ∥2=∑n∥ψn∥2=0 then ψn=0 for every n, so the displayed form is positive definite and is an inner product.

1.2F1algebra

[Completeness] Let (ψ(k))k be a Cauchy sequence in F(H) and let ε>0. For each n, ∥ψn(k)−ψn(l)∥≤∥ψ(k)−ψ(l)∥, so (ψn(k))k is Cauchy in the complete space H⊗n ([F1]) and converges to some ψn∈H⊗n; since ran⁡P+(n) is closed, ψn∈ran⁡P+(n) ([F1]). Choose K with ∥ψ(k)−ψ(m)∥≤ε for k,m≥K. Fix k≥K. For every finite N, ∑n≤N∥ψn∥2≤2∑n≤N∥ψn(k)∥2+2∑n≤N∥ψn−ψn(k)∥2≤2∥ψ(k)∥2+2ε2, where the last term uses the limit as m→∞ in ∑n≤N∥ψn(m)−ψn(k)∥2≤ε2. Taking the supremum over finite N shows ψ=(ψn)n∈F(H). Also, for each k≥K and finite N, ∑n≤N∥ψn(k)−ψn∥2≤ε2 by letting m→∞ in ∑n≤N∥ψn(k)−ψn(m)∥2≤ε2; taking the supremum gives ∥ψ(k)−ψ∥≤ε. Thus ψ(k)→ψ and F(H) is complete, proving (b).

1.3F1F4algebra

[Vacuum, density and embeddings] The vacuum has ∥Ω∥=∣1∣=1. For ψ∈F(H) the truncations ψ(N):=(ψ0,…,ψN,0,0,… )∈F0 satisfy ∥ψ−ψ(N)∥2=∑n>N∥ψn∥2→0, so F0 is dense by [F4]; F0 is a linear subspace because each ran⁡P+(n) is one ([F1]). Each ιn is linear and ∥ιn(u)∥2=∥u∥2, and its range is the set of vectors supported in coordinate n, a closed subspace identified isometrically with ran⁡P+(n).

1.4F2F3algebra

[The direct sum is closed] Let (Tn) be as in (f) and let (ψ(k))k⊆D(T) with ψ(k)→ψ and Tψ(k)→η in F(H). For each n, ψn(k)→ψn and Tnψn(k)=(Tψ(k))n→ηn; since Tn is self-adjoint, hence closed ([F3]), ψn∈D(Tn) and Tnψn=ηn. For every finite N, continuity of the norm and the finite sum give ∑n≤N∥Tnψn∥2=lim⁡k∑n≤N∥Tnψn(k)∥2≤lim⁡k∥Tψ(k)∥2=∥η∥2. Taking the supremum over finite partial sums shows ∑n∥Tnψn∥2≤∥η∥2<∞, so ψ∈D(T) and Tψ=η; thus T is closed. It is symmetric because for ψ,φ∈D(T) the middle series below converges absolutely by [F2] applied to the square-summable families (∥Tnψn∥)n, (∥φn∥)n and (∥Tnφn∥)n: ⟨Tψ,φ⟩=∑n⟨Tnψn,φn⟩=∑n⟨ψn,Tnφn⟩=⟨ψ,Tφ⟩.

1.5F3algebra

[Density of the direct-sum domain] Let ψ∈F(H) and ε>0. Choose N so that ∑n>N∥ψn∥2<ε2/4. For each of the finitely many n≤N, the self-adjoint operator Tn is densely defined, so choose φn∈D(Tn) with ∥φn−ψn∥<ε/(2N+1); put φn=0 for n>N. The vector φ belongs to D(T) because it has finite support and every retained coordinate belongs to its operator domain. Moreover, ∥φ−ψ∥2=∑n≤N∥φn−ψn∥2+∑n>N∥ψn∥2<ε2/2<ε2. Thus D(T) is dense in F(H).

2.1F2F3step 1.4step 1.5algebra

[The adjoint is the same diagonal sum] Let φ∈D(T∗) with C:=∥T∗φ∥, so ∣⟨Tψ,φ⟩∣≤C∥ψ∥ for all ψ∈D(T). Testing with ψ supported in a single coordinate n shows that the functional ψn↦⟨Tnψn,φn⟩ on the dense domain D(Tn) is bounded by C∥ψn∥; hence φn∈D(Tn∗)=D(Tn) and Tnφn=(T∗φ)n. Since T∗φ∈F(H), the coordinate identity gives ∑n∥Tnφn∥2=∥T∗φ∥2<∞. Therefore D(T∗)⊆D(T) and T∗φ=Tφ; with T⊆T∗ from step 1.4, T=T∗ is self-adjoint, and D(T) is dense by step 1.5. If every Tn is bounded by M:=sup⁡n∥Tn∥<∞, then ∥Tψ∥2=∑n∥Tnψn∥2≤M2∥ψ∥2 for every ψ∈F(H) and testing on unit vectors in individual nonzero sectors where ∥Tn∥ approaches M gives the reverse inequality.

3.1F1step 1.3algebra∎

[Separability] Assume (ei)i∈I is a complete orthonormal family of H with I at most countable. For n≥1 the elementary tensors ei1⊗⋯⊗ein, (i1,…,in)∈In, have dense linear span in H⊗n by the product-bases statement of Hilbert tensor construction: inner product, completion and product bases; since P+(n) is bounded, the image P+(n) of a dense set is dense in ran⁡P+(n) (given u=P+(n)u in the range and approximants vj→u, continuity gives P+(n)vj→u). Hence the at most countable set D:={ιn(P+(n)(ei1⊗⋯⊗ein)):n≥1, i1,…,in∈I}∪{Ω} has dense span in F(H): any ψ∈F(H) is the limit of its truncations, and each ψn is approximated in ran⁡P+(n) by finite combinations from D. A normed space with a countable set whose finite linear combinations are dense is separable.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources