Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Fock sector projections

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). Let H be a complex Hilbert space (Hilbert space) with completed tensor powers H⊗n and symmetric projections P+(n) as in Hilbert direct-sum construction, so that F(H)={ψ=(ψn)n∈N: ψn∈ran⁡P+(n), ∑n∥ψn∥2<∞} is a Hilbert space. For n∈N define Πn:F(H)→F(H),Πnψ:=(0,…,0,ψn,0,… ) (the entry ψn in coordinate n and 0 in all other coordinates). Then:

(a) each Πn is a bounded linear operator with ∥Πnψ∥=∥ψn∥ and ∥Πn∥≤1; it satisfies Πn2=Πn, Πn∗=Πn (The Hilbert-space adjoint of a bounded operator), and Πn is the Hilbert orthogonal projection of F(H) onto the closed subspace ιn(ran⁡P+(n)) of vectors supported in coordinate n (The Hilbert orthogonal projection onto a closed subspace);

(b) ΠnΠm=0 for n≠m, so the ranges are pairwise orthogonal and ∥Πn∥=1 whenever ran⁡P+(n)≠{0} (which holds for every n when H≠{0});

(c) for every ψ∈F(H) the series ∑nΠnψ converges in norm to ψ, the expansion is orthogonal, ψ=∑n∈NΠnψ,∥ψ∥2=∑n∈N∥Πnψ∥2, and the partial sums ∑n≤NΠn converge to the identity in the strong operator topology, i.e. ∥ψ−∑n≤NΠnψ∥→0 for every ψ∈F(H) (Dense, nowhere dense and codense subsets of a topological space, and the criterion by basic open sets, A bounded linear operator between normed spaces);

(d) Πn=0 as an operator if and only if ran⁡P+(n)={0}; for H≠{0} no Πn vanishes.

No physical interpretation of the Fock space or of its sectors is asserted.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the complex Hilbert space H with completed tensor powers H⊗n and symmetric projections P+(n) (n≥1, P+(0)=idC), the Hilbert space F(H) with inner product ⟨ψ,φ⟩=∑n⟨ψn,φn⟩, the vacuum Ω=(1,0,0,… ), and vectors ψ,φ∈F(H).

[F1]

F(H) is a Hilbert space; for ψ∈F(H) one has ψn∈ran⁡P+(n), ∑n∥ψn∥2=∥ψ∥2<∞, and coordinatewise operations; the truncations ψ(N)=(ψ0,…,ψN,0,0,… ) satisfy ψ(N)→ψ (Hilbert direct-sum construction).

[F2]

For each n≥1, P+(n) is an orthogonal projection on the Hilbert space H⊗n, hence ran⁡P+(n) is a closed linear subspace (Permutation sector projections on the n-fold tensor power, Hilbert direct-sum construction).

[F3]

The Hilbert orthogonal projection onto a closed subspace M is characterized by Px∈M and x−Px∈M⊥ for every x; it is self-adjoint, idempotent and contractive (The Hilbert orthogonal projection onto a closed subspace, Hilbert projections are linear, self-adjoint and contractive, The operator norm as the least bound and as the unit-sphere or unit-ball supremum).

[F4]

For ψ∈F(H) its truncation ψ(N) has squared norm ∑n≤N∥ψn∥2 and converges in norm to ψ (Hilbert direct-sum construction).

Proof

1.1F1algebra

[Algebraic properties] For ψ∈F(H) the tuple Πnψ lies in F(H) because its coordinate n is ψn∈ran⁡P+(n) and all other coordinates vanish ([F1]); clearly Πn(ψ+cχ)=Πnψ+c Πnχ, so Πn is linear, and ∥Πnψ∥2=∥ψn∥2≤∥ψ∥2 gives ∥Πn∥≤1. Obviously Πn2=Πn. For the adjoint: ⟨Πnψ,φ⟩=⟨ψn,φn⟩=⟨ψ,Πnφ⟩ for all ψ,φ∈F(H), so Πn∗=Πn by uniqueness of the Hilbert-space adjoint.

1.2F2F3algebra

[Orthogonality and ranges] For n≠m, ΠnΠm=0 because the tuple Πmψ is supported in coordinate m and Πn reads coordinate n. The range of Πn is exactly the set of vectors of F(H) supported in coordinate n, a closed subspace that is identified with ran⁡P+(n) by the isometry ιn ; it is closed in F(H) because if Πnψ(k)→η, then ηm=0 for m≠n and ηn∈ran⁡P+(n) by closedness ([F2]). For every ψ, the difference ψ−Πnψ has zero coordinate n and is orthogonal to every vector supported there by the direct-sum inner product; hence [F3] identifies Πn with the orthogonal projection onto its range. This range identification also proves Πn=0 exactly when the sector is zero; when ran⁡P+(n)≠{0} choose a unit u there and note ∥Πnιn(u)∥=1, so ∥Πn∥=1. For H≠{0} and n≥1 one has 0≠e⊗n∈ran⁡P+(n) for any e≠0 in H, and ran⁡P+(0)=C, so no Πn vanishes. If H={0}, every positive tensor power is zero, F(H) consists only of its scalar vacuum coordinate, Π0=I, and Πn=0 for n≥1; the same coordinate arguments apply. Thus (b), (d) hold.

2.1F1F4step 1.2algebra

[Orthogonal expansion] For ψ∈F(H) put ψ(N):=∑n≤NΠnψ and r(N):=ψ−ψ(N), whose coordinates are ψn for n>N and 0 otherwise. Then ∥r(N)∥2=∑n>N∥ψn∥2→0 by [F1], so ∑nΠnψ converges to ψ in norm. The terms Πnψ=ιn(ψn) are pairwise orthogonal by step 1.2, and [F4] gives ∥ψ(N)∥2=∑n≤N∥ψn∥2; passing to the limit and using continuity of the norm and of the inner product gives ∥ψ∥2=∑n∥Πnψ∥2.

3.1step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1algebra∎

[Strong convergence and conclusion] Since ∥ψ−∑n≤NΠnψ∥2=∑n>N∥ψn∥2→0 for every ψ∈F(H) by step 2.1, the partial sums of (Πn) converge to the identity in the strong operator topology; combined with steps 1.1, 1.2 and 2.1 this proves (a)-(d).

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources