Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Closed adjoint sector domains

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). Let H be a complex Hilbert space (Hilbert space) with completed tensor powers H⊗n, symmetric projections P+(n), contraction maps Ψf(n), Fock space F(H) and core operators S±(f) on the finite-particle space F0 as in Creation contraction bounds. For f∈H define D(A+(f)):={ψ∈F(H): ∑n∈N(n+1)∥P+(n+1)(f⊗ψn)∥2<∞},(A+(f)ψ)n:=n P+(n)(f⊗ψn−1) (n≥1), (A+(f)ψ)0:=0, D(A−(f)):={ψ∈F(H): ∑n∈N(n+1)∥Ψf(n)(ψn+1)∥2<∞},(A−(f)ψ)n:=n+1 Ψf(n)(ψn+1). Put D1:={ψ∈F(H):∑n(n+1)∥ψn∥2<∞}. Then:

(a) A+(f) and A−(f) are well-defined linear operators on F(H) with the displayed domains, and they are the closure and the adjoint of the core operator: A+(f)=S+(f)‾=S−(f)∗,A−(f)=S+(f)∗=S−(f)‾ (Adjoint of a densely defined operator, Densely defined, closed and closable operators, and cores, Symmetric, self-adjoint and essentially self-adjoint operators);

(b) both A±(f) are closed, densely defined and satisfy A+(f)∗=A−(f), A−(f)∗=A+(f); in particular F0⊆D1⊆D(A±(f));

(c) for every ψ∈D1, ∥A+(f)ψ∥≤∥f∥ ∥ψ∥1 and ∥A−(f)ψ∥≤∥f∥ ∥ψ∥1, where ∥ψ∥12=∑n(n+1)∥ψn∥2;

(d) for every g∈H and ψ∈D1 the identity ∥A+(g)ψ∥2=∥A−(g)ψ∥2+∥g∥2∥ψ∥2 holds.

No boundedness of A±(f) on F(H), no self-adjointness of A±(f), and no physical interpretation is asserted.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the complex Hilbert space H, the Fock space F(H) with dense finite-particle subspace F0, the core operators S±(f):F0→F0 and contraction maps Ψf(n), vectors f,g∈H, and vectors φ,ψ∈F(H).

[F1]

F(H) is a Hilbert space, F0 is dense, and ∥ψ∥2=∑n∥ψn∥2 (Hilbert direct-sum construction).

[F2]

S+(f) and S−(f) are densely defined linear (resp. conjugate-linear in f) operators on F0 with the sector formulas (S+(f)ψ)n=nP+(n)(f⊗ψn−1), (S−(f)ψ)n=n+1Ψf(n)(ψn+1), and ⟨S+(f)φ,ψ⟩=⟨φ,S−(f)ψ⟩ for φ,ψ∈F0; Ψf(n)(ran⁡P+(n+1))⊆ran⁡P+(n) (Creation contraction bounds).

[F3]

If T is a densely defined operator with S⊆T for a densely defined S, then T∗⊆S∗; if T is closed and S‾=T then T=S∗∗; adjoints are closed operators (Adjoint of a densely defined operator, Densely defined, closed and closable operators, and cores, Symmetric, self-adjoint and essentially self-adjoint operators).

[F4]

Cauchy-Schwarz in the Hilbert space F(H): ∣⟨η,θ⟩∣≤∥η∥ ∥θ∥ (Cauchy–Schwarz: ∣⟨x,y⟩∣≤∥x∥ ∥y∥, with equality exactly for dependent pairs).

Proof

1.1F1F2F3algebra

[The raising operator and its closure] For every n the map ψ↦P+(n+1)(f⊗ψn) is bounded with norm at most ∥f∥ by [F2], so D(A+(f)) is a linear subspace containing F0 and A+(f) is a linear operator extending S+(f) with (A+(f)ψ)n∈ran⁡P+(n) for all ψ∈D(A+(f)) and ∑n∥(A+(f)ψ)n∥2<∞, so A+(f)ψ∈F(H). If ψ(k)∈D(A+(f)) with ψ(k)→ψ and A+(f)ψ(k)→η, then for each m≥1 continuity of ψ↦P+(m)(f⊗ψm−1) gives ηm=mP+(m)(f⊗ψm−1), and η0=0. For every finite N, continuity of the norm and the finite sum gives ∑n=0N(n+1)∥P+(n+1)(f⊗ψn)∥2=lim⁡k∑n=0N(n+1)∥P+(n+1)(f⊗ψn(k))∥2≤lim⁡k∥A+(f)ψ(k)∥2=∥η∥2. Taking the supremum over N shows ψ∈D(A+(f)); the coordinate formulas then give A+(f)ψ=η, so A+(f) is closed. For ψ∈D(A+(f)) the truncations ψ(N) lie in F0, satisfy ψ(N)→ψ, and A+(f)ψ(N)→A+(f)ψ because the defining series of ψ converges; hence F0 is a core and A+(f)=S+(f)‾.

1.2F1F2F3F4algebra

[The lowering operator is the core adjoint] For ψ∈F(H) set ηn:=n+1 Ψf(n)ψn+1. For φ∈F0, [F2] gives ⟨S+(f)φ,ψ⟩=∑n≥0⟨φn,ηn⟩, a finite sum because φ has finite support. If ∑n∥ηn∥2<∞, Cauchy--Schwarz shows this functional is bounded on F0 and its representing vector is (ηn)n=A−(f)ψ. Conversely, if the functional is bounded with norm C, let φ(N) have coordinates ηn for n≤N and zero thereafter. Then φ(N)∈F0 and SN:=∑n≤N∥ηn∥2=∣⟨S+(f)φ(N),ψ⟩∣≤C∥φ(N)∥=CSN, so SN≤C2 for every N. Hence (ηn)n∈F(H) and the functional is represented by A−(f)ψ. Thus ψ∈D(S+(f)∗) exactly when ∑n(n+1)∥Ψf(n)ψn+1∥2<∞, and S+(f)∗=A−(f). As an adjoint A−(f) is closed, and it is densely defined because it contains F0.

1.3F1F2algebra

[Weighted domain and bounds] For ψ∈D1, ∑n(n+1)∥P+(n+1)(f⊗ψn)∥2≤∥f∥2∑n(n+1)∥ψn∥2<∞ and likewise ∑n(n+1)∥Ψf(n)(ψn+1)∥2≤∥f∥2∑n(n+1)∥ψn+1∥2<∞, so D1⊆D(A±(f)) and the bounds of (c) follow from the same estimates; since F0⊆D1, this also gives the density in (b).

2.1F2F3step 1.1step 1.2algebra

[Mutual adjoints] Since A+(f)=S+(f)‾=S+(f)∗∗ by step 1.1, [F3] gives A+(f)∗=S+(f)∗∗∗=S+(f)∗=A−(f) by step 1.2. Applying the same step 1.2 with the roles of S+ and S− exchanged (the adjoint relation of [F2] is symmetric in the two core operators) gives S−(f)∗=A+(f), hence A−(f)∗=S+(f)∗∗=A+(f). Consequently both operators are closed with the stated adjoint pairs, proving (a) and (b) apart from the domain inclusion.

3.1F1F2step 1.1step 1.3algebra∎

[The weighted norm identity] Let ψ∈D1 and let ψ(N) be its truncations; then ψ(N)→ψ and, by the sector formulas and the convergence of the defining sums of ψ, A±(g)ψ(N)→A±(g)ψ. The identity of Creation contraction bounds (d) applies to ψ(N)∈F0; passing to the limit in ∥A+(g)ψ(N)∥2=∥A−(g)ψ(N)∥2+∥g∥2∥ψ(N)∥2 using continuity of the norm and of addition in F(H) gives the displayed identity for ψ. This proves (d) and completes the proof.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources