Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Constructed one-coordinate positive-quartic example on full L2

Physical scope

One fixed dimensionless coordinate model on full L2(R,dq;C) with a positive quartic potential term, form-selected Hamiltonian, global unitary evolution, and the proved energy-increment bound. No empirical data or continuum field theory.

Example

Choose N=1, a=1, r=1, and λ=1, all dimensionless. The potential is V(q)=q2/2+q4, and the physical Hamiltonian is Hphys=E∗h with E∗>0 joules. The coordinate-space Hilbert space is the full H1=L2(R,dq;C) of Finite-lattice polynomial Hamiltonian data, not a finite matrix truncation. The positive q4 term is present in the potential of the full form-selected operator. This is a one-coordinate model; no field-scattering, continuum, or empirical conclusion is asserted.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The N=1 data above, Countable Choice, and the conditional results below.

[A1]

The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω): every countable family of nonempty sets has a choice function, as assumed by the QFT-IR01 mathematical suppliers.

[F1]

Constructed regulated polynomial-model evolution: for the constructed self-adjoint form realization, the physical evolution is a strongly continuous unitary group for all real seconds, with the generator domain specified in that theorem.

[F2]

Controlled quartic-model ground-energy bound: for the potential Vλ(q)=r2q2/2+λq4, 0≤Egphys(λ)−Egphys(0)≤3E∗aλ/(2r2).

[F3]

Finite-lattice polynomial Hamiltonian data: for N=1 the coordinate space is R, the Hilbert space is L2(R,dq;C), and the polynomial differential expression is defined on Cc∞(R;C); the definition does not assert a self-adjoint operator domain.

Verification

1.1F3algebra

The parameters satisfy a>0, r>0, and λ>0, and V(q)=q2/2+q4≥q2/2, so the coercivity hypotheses hold with c=1/2 and C0=0. The coordinate variable q ranges over R; vectors in H1 are square-integrable complex functions of q, identified up to equality almost everywhere by [F3]. The characteristic functions 1[3n,3n+1), n∈N, are nonzero pairwise orthogonal vectors, so this Hilbert space is infinite-dimensional.

2.1A1F2step 1.1algebra

By [A1], the Countable Choice hypothesis of [F2] holds. Substituting a=r=λ=1 into it gives 0≤Egphys(1)−Egphys(0)≤3E∗/2. This is an exact bound for the selected model, not an exact value of either ground energy.

3.1A1F1step 1.1algebra∎

By [A1], the Countable Choice hypothesis of [F1] holds. Applying [F1] to the same selected model gives a global unitary group Uphys(τ) for every τ∈R, norm preservation for all states, and differentiability precisely on the stated Hamiltonian domain. The quartic coefficient is positive, and the Hilbert space is infinite-dimensional by step 1.1; thus this is a one-coordinate polynomial operator model on the full Hilbert space, not a finite matrix replacement. No observation or continuum extrapolation is asserted.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources