How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Constructed one-coordinate positive-quartic example on full
One fixed dimensionless coordinate model on full with a positive quartic potential term, form-selected Hamiltonian, global unitary evolution, and the proved energy-increment bound. No empirical data or continuum field theory.
Example
Choose , , , and , all dimensionless. The potential is , and the physical Hamiltonian is with joules. The coordinate-space Hilbert space is the full of Finite-lattice polynomial Hamiltonian data, not a finite matrix truncation. The positive term is present in the potential of the full form-selected operator. This is a one-coordinate model; no field-scattering, continuum, or empirical conclusion is asserted.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The data above, Countable Choice, and the conditional results below.
The Axiom of Countable Choice (): every countable family of nonempty sets has a choice function, as assumed by the QFT-IR01 mathematical suppliers.
Constructed regulated polynomial-model evolution: for the constructed self-adjoint form realization, the physical evolution is a strongly continuous unitary group for all real seconds, with the generator domain specified in that theorem.
Controlled quartic-model ground-energy bound: for the potential , .
Finite-lattice polynomial Hamiltonian data: for the coordinate space is , the Hilbert space is , and the polynomial differential expression is defined on ; the definition does not assert a self-adjoint operator domain.
Verification
The parameters satisfy , , and , and , so the coercivity hypotheses hold with and . The coordinate variable ranges over ; vectors in are square-integrable complex functions of , identified up to equality almost everywhere by [F3]. The characteristic functions , , are nonzero pairwise orthogonal vectors, so this Hilbert space is infinite-dimensional.
By [A1], the Countable Choice hypothesis of [F2] holds. Substituting into it gives . This is an exact bound for the selected model, not an exact value of either ground energy.
By [A1], the Countable Choice hypothesis of [F1] holds. Applying [F1] to the same selected model gives a global unitary group for every , norm preservation for all states, and differentiability precisely on the stated Hamiltonian domain. The quartic coefficient is positive, and the Hilbert space is infinite-dimensional by step 1.1; thus this is a one-coordinate polynomial operator model on the full Hilbert space, not a finite matrix replacement. No observation or continuum extrapolation is asserted.