Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A charge-one BPST saddle and its formal sector weight

Physical scope

Conditional classical SU(2) Euclidean Yang–Mills example on compactified oriented S4; the displayed exponential is only a formal single-saddle factor, not a continuum observable or measured value.

Example

Assume full AC, meaning that every family of nonempty sets has a choice function; in particular, countable choice holds. Let S4={z∈R5:∣z∣=1} have its unit round metric. Put p∞=(0,0,0,0,−1) and p0=(0,0,0,0,1). Specify the inverse stereographic maps κN:R4→UN:=S4∖{p∞} and κS:R4→US:=S4∖{p0} by κN(x)=(2x/(1+∣x∣2),(1−∣x∣2)/(1+∣x∣2)) and κS(y)=(2y/(1+∣y∣2),(∣y∣2−1)/(1+∣y∣2)). Here x and y denote their inverse coordinates on UN and US, respectively; orient S4 so dx1∧dx2∧dx3∧dx4>0. In the north chart put r2=∑μ=14(xμ)2; the metric is 4(1+r2)−2∑μ(dxμ)2. In the south chart put y=x/r2; the metric is 4(1+∣y∣2)−2∑μ(dyμ)2. Define SU(2)={U∈M2(C):U∗U=I2,det⁡U=1}, with Lie algebra su(2)={X∈M2(C):X∗=−X,tr⁡2X=0} and commutator bracket; for U∈SU(2) set Ad⁡UX:=UXU−1. Use the Pauli matrices σ1=(0110), σ2=(0−ii0), σ3=(100−1) and anti-Hermitian generators Ta=−iσa/2 with tr⁡2(TaTb)=−12δab. Let ϵijk be totally antisymmetric with ϵ123=1, set ηaij=ϵaij, ηai4=δai, ηˉaij=−ϵaij, and ηˉai4=δai for i,j∈{1,2,3}, and extend both arrays antisymmetrically in their last two indices. For any ρ>0, put u(x)=(x4I2−ixjσj)/r on the overlap, and glue two trivial right SU(2) bundles with local sections satisfying sS=sNu−1. Call the resulting bundle P, require its sector code [P] to belong to the Euclidean model's admitted set Σ, and supply this P as that sector's representative in the compact branch. The local connection potentials are

AN=2ηaμνxνr2+ρ2Ta dxμ,AS=−2ρ2ηˉaμνyν1+ρ2∣y∣2Ta dyμ.

On the overlap the potentials obey AS=Ad⁡uAN+u d(u−1), with the right-action section convention above. Their curvature representatives are FN=dAN+12[AN∧AN] and FS=dAS+12[AS∧AS], using the alternating wedge–Lie bracket normalized by 12[A∧A](Y,Z)=[A(Y),A(Z)]; the transition makes them representatives of one global adjoint-bundle-valued curvature F. For smooth su(2)-valued forms α=∑aTaαa and β=∑bTbβb with real coefficient forms, use κ(α∧β)=∑a,bκ(Ta,Tb)αa∧βb, where κ(X,Y)=−2tr⁡2(XY). The conditional Euclidean action is SE=(2gYM2)−1∫S4κ(F∧∗F), and the compactified charge ν=−(8π2)−1∫S4tr⁡2(F∧F), for fixed gYM>0. For this specified smooth two-chart connection, the charge is ν=1, the curvature is self-dual, and SE=8π2/gYM2. A classical saddle means a smooth admissible connection whose first variation of SE vanishes for every smooth compactly supported adjoint-bundle-valued one-form variation preserving the supplied data. This connection is a classical saddle, and its nonzero charge and self-duality make it an instanton saddle. If the formal sector expression includes the dimensionless theta coupling θ, the corresponding formal single-saddle factor is e−8π2/gYM2+iθ. This factor is not an evaluated continuum path integral.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Full AC; the conditional Euclidean SU(2) model and compactified charge convention of the assigned Definition; gYM>0; the oriented round S4 charts, Pauli matrices, symbols, scale ρ>0, two-chart gluing, and local potentials in the Example.

[A1]

Full AC means that every family of nonempty sets has a choice function; it implies the ACω model hypothesis and the full-choice hypotheses of the charge, action-bound, and BPST suppliers. The Axiom of Choice, Trace-normalized instanton number and self-dual sectors, Euclidean Yang–Mills self-dual action bound, Explicit charge-one BPST connection on the round four-sphere

[A2]

The Definition assumes ACω for its smooth gauge data and connections, fixes the Euclidean action as SE=(2gYM2)−1∫κ(F∧∗F) with positive invariant κ=−2tr⁡2=2Btop, and defines a saddle by vanishing first variation under smooth compactly supported connection variations. Euclidean Yang–Mills sectors and instanton interpretation

[F1]

The explicitly specified two-chart BPST connection obeys AS=Ad⁡uAN+u d(u−1), so its potentials define a smooth global connection on the glued bundle; it has F=∗F, qB=1 in the stated orientation and trace normalization, and SB(g)=g−2∫S4Btop(F∧∗F)=8π2/g2<∞. Explicit charge-one BPST connection on the round four-sphere

[F2]

The charge supplier defines qB=(8π2)−1∫XBtop(F∧F) with Btop=−tr⁡2 in the defining SU(2) representation. Trace-normalized instanton number and self-dual sectors

[F3]

For every self-dual supplied connection, the local Bianchi identity implies the source-free Euclidean equation DA(∗FA)=0, where DAη=dη+[A∧η]. Euclidean Yang–Mills self-dual action bound

[F4]

Assume ACω. If X is an oriented smooth four-manifold with boundary and η is a compactly supported smooth three-form, then ∫Xdη=∫∂Xη; an empty boundary contributes zero. The general Stokes theorem

[F5]

The sector expression contains the factor eiθν and is only a formal continuum notation; it supplies no measure, gauge-fixing prescription, determinant, or limiting argument. Euclidean Yang–Mills sectors and instanton interpretation

Verification

1.1givenA2F1F2

The actual two-chart construction in [F1] supplies a smooth global connection with the stated curvature and qB=1. Its bundle is the supplied representative of an admitted sector by the Example, so it is admissible in the compact branch of [A2]. By [F2], its charge convention is exactly ν=qB of the assigned Definition, so ν=1.

1.2F1F3

Self-duality and Bianchi give DA(∗FA)=DAFA=0 by [F3]. Therefore the first-variation calculation below has a vanishing Euler–Lagrange term.

2.1A1F1F2step 1.1algebraA2

Since κ=2Btop, the Euclidean action is SE=(1/gYM2)∫S4Btop(F∧∗F), which is the SB(g) of [F1] at g=gYM. Thus SE=8π2/gYM2.

2.2A1F3F4step 1.2algebraA2

Let a be any smooth adjoint-bundle-valued one-form on compact S4 and vary At=A+ta. Expanding FAt=dAt+12[At∧At] gives FAt=FA+t(da+[A∧a])+12t2[a∧a], because the bracket of two one-forms is symmetric under exchange. Symmetry of κ and the two-form Hodge inner product then give ddt∣0SE[At]=gYM−2∫S4κ((da+[A∧a])∧∗FA). The graded product rule gives dκ(a∧∗FA)=κ(da∧∗FA)−κ(a∧d∗FA). Infinitesimal Ad-invariance, κ([X,Y],Z)=κ(X,[Y,Z]), gives κ([A∧a]∧∗FA)=κ(a∧[A∧∗FA]) after the degree-one wedge reorder; adding the identities yields dκ(a∧∗FA)=κ((da+[A∧a])∧∗FA)−κ(a∧DA∗FA). The scalar three-form κ(a∧∗FA) is globally defined since κ is Ad-invariant, and is compactly supported because S4 is compact. By [F4] its exterior derivative integrates to zero on the closed manifold; using step 1.2, the first variation is gYM−2∫S4κ(a∧DA∗FA)=0. This holds for every such a, proving the saddle condition in [A1].

3.1F5step 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

Substitution of ν=1 and the action from steps 1.1 and 2.1 into the formal sector factor e−SE+iθν in [F5] gives e−8π2/gYM2+iθ. The Definition supplies only a formal expression and no continuum measure, gauge fixing, determinant, or limiting argument, so this is not a partition-function value.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources