Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck pendingjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Unequal local rings with equal completions

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let A=C[t](t) be the localization of C[t] at polynomials nonzero at 0, and let B=C{t} be the ring of holomorphic germs at 0. The canonical map A→B is faithfully flat and induces the common completion C⟦t⟧, but it is not surjective: the convergent exponential germ e(t)=∑n=0∞tn/n! is not in its image.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, the local rings A and B, and the exponential germ e(t) in the statement.

[A1]

AC is the principle that every family of nonempty sets has a choice function (The Axiom of Choice).

[F1]

Every element of A=C[t](t) has a fraction representative p(t)/q(t) with p,q∈C[t] and q(0)≠0 (Multiplicative subsets and the localisation S−1R as equivalence classes of fractions).

[F2]

The local algebraic-to-holomorphic map for the finite-type chart AC1 at 0 is faithfully flat and induces the common completion C⟦t⟧ (Faithful flatness of finite-type algebraic-to-analytic local rings).

[F3]

If two coefficient families satisfy bounds ∣cn∣≤Mr−n and ∣cn′∣≤M′r−n on a common positive radius r, and their sums agree throughout ∣t∣<r, then their coefficients agree (Bounded multivariable power series are holomorphic with unique derivative coefficients).

[F4]

If its coefficients satisfy ∣cn∣≤Mr−n on a positive radius r, the power series defines a holomorphic function on ∣t∣<r (Bounded multivariable power series are holomorphic with unique derivative coefficients).

Verification

1.1givenA1F2

Apply [F2] to X=Spec⁡C[t] and its closed point t=0. It gives faithful flatness of A→B and identifies both maximal-ideal completions with C⟦t⟧.

1.2givenF4algebra

Fix any R>0 and put un=Rn/n!. Choose N with N+1≥2R. For every k≥0, uN+k+1/uN+k=R/(N+k+1)≤1/2, so induction gives uN+k≤uN2−k. The finite identity ∑k=0K2−k=2−2−K≤2 bounds every partial sum of the tail by 2uN. Define the explicit finite constant MR=∑n=0N−1un+2uN, with an empty initial sum interpreted as zero. For n<N, un is one nonnegative summand of MR; for n≥N, the geometric estimate gives un≤uN≤MR. Thus Rn/n!≤MR for every n, without passing to an infinite sum; hence for any 0<r<R, 1/n!≤MRR−n≤MRr−n. The coefficient family of e(t) therefore satisfies the exact uniform bound required by [F4] on radius r, so [F4] makes its sum holomorphic on ∣t∣<r. As R is arbitrary, these disks cover a neighborhood of 0 (indeed all of C), and e defines a holomorphic germ.

2.1F1F3step 1.2algebra

Suppose e(t)=p(t)/q(t) in A, with q(0)≠0. Then q(t)e(t)=p(t) as germs and evaluation at 0 gives p(0)=q(0)≠0. Write q(t)=∑j=0dqjtj with qd≠0, and let m=deg⁡p. Equality of germs supplies ε>0 such that qe=p on ∣t∣<ε. Fix R>0 and choose 0<r<min⁡(R,ε). By step 1.2 the coefficients cn=1/n! of e satisfy ∣cn∣≤MRr−n. The coefficient bN=∑j=0min⁡(d,N)qjcN−j of qe satisfies ∣bN∣≤MRr−N∑j=0d∣qj∣rj. If pN denotes the coefficient of tN in p, then ∣pN∣≤Mpr−N for all N, where Mp=max⁡0≤N≤m∣pN∣rN. Thus both series satisfy the common-radius bound in [F3], and their sums agree on ∣t∣<r, so [F3] gives bN=pN for every N. For every integer N>max⁡(d,m) this yields ∑j=0dqj/(N−j)!=0. Multiplying by N! gives Q(N)=0, where Q(z)=∑j=0dqjz(z−1)⋯(z−j+1). This is a nonzero polynomial of degree d with leading coefficient qd. To prove the needed root bound locally, a nonzero constant has no roots. If a degree-d polynomial P with d>0 has a root a, the finite identities zj−aj=(z−a)∑ℓ=0j−1zj−1−ℓaℓ give P(z)=P(z)−P(a)=(z−a)S(z), where S has degree d−1 and the same nonzero leading coefficient. Every other root b≠a satisfies (b−a)S(b)=0, hence S(b)=0 because the nonzero complex number b−a is invertible. Induction gives at most d−1 such roots and at most d roots in total. Applying this bound to Q contradicts its vanishing on the infinitely many distinct integers N>max⁡(d,m). This contradiction proves that e(t) is not in the image of A.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1∎

Step 1.1 establishes faithful flatness and equality of completions, while step 2.1 establishes failure of surjectivity.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources