How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Unequal local rings with equal completions
Example
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be the localization of at polynomials nonzero at , and let be the ring of holomorphic germs at . The canonical map is faithfully flat and induces the common completion , but it is not surjective: the convergent exponential germ is not in its image.
Example references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, the local rings and , and the exponential germ in the statement.
AC is the principle that every family of nonempty sets has a choice function (The Axiom of Choice).
Every element of has a fraction representative with and (Multiplicative subsets and the localisation as equivalence classes of fractions).
The local algebraic-to-holomorphic map for the finite-type chart at is faithfully flat and induces the common completion (Faithful flatness of finite-type algebraic-to-analytic local rings).
If two coefficient families satisfy bounds and on a common positive radius , and their sums agree throughout , then their coefficients agree (Bounded multivariable power series are holomorphic with unique derivative coefficients).
If its coefficients satisfy on a positive radius , the power series defines a holomorphic function on (Bounded multivariable power series are holomorphic with unique derivative coefficients).
Verification
Apply [F2] to and its closed point . It gives faithful flatness of and identifies both maximal-ideal completions with .
Fix any and put . Choose with . For every , , so induction gives . The finite identity bounds every partial sum of the tail by . Define the explicit finite constant , with an empty initial sum interpreted as zero. For , is one nonnegative summand of ; for , the geometric estimate gives . Thus for every , without passing to an infinite sum; hence for any , . The coefficient family of therefore satisfies the exact uniform bound required by [F4] on radius , so [F4] makes its sum holomorphic on . As is arbitrary, these disks cover a neighborhood of (indeed all of ), and defines a holomorphic germ.
Suppose in , with . Then as germs and evaluation at gives . Write with , and let . Equality of germs supplies such that on . Fix and choose . By step 1.2 the coefficients of satisfy . The coefficient of satisfies . If denotes the coefficient of in , then for all , where . Thus both series satisfy the common-radius bound in [F3], and their sums agree on , so [F3] gives for every . For every integer this yields . Multiplying by gives , where . This is a nonzero polynomial of degree with leading coefficient . To prove the needed root bound locally, a nonzero constant has no roots. If a degree- polynomial with has a root , the finite identities give , where has degree and the same nonzero leading coefficient. Every other root satisfies , hence because the nonzero complex number is invertible. Induction gives at most such roots and at most roots in total. Applying this bound to contradicts its vanishing on the infinitely many distinct integers . This contradiction proves that is not in the image of .
Step 1.1 establishes faithful flatness and equality of completions, while step 2.1 establishes failure of surjectivity.