Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pendingjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite-support coherent sheaves have finite-dimensional global sections

Example

Assume full AC. Let 0≤r≤3 and let F be a coherent analytic module on Pr(C) whose support S:={x∈Pr(C):Fx≠0} is finite. Assume each stalk Fx is finite-dimensional over C, and put ℓ:=∑x∈Sdim⁡CFx. Then H0(Pr(C),F)≅⨁x∈SFx has complex dimension ℓ, and Hq(Pr(C),F)=0 for every q>0. Here Hq is ordinary right-derived sheaf cohomology and ℓ is the total complex length of the finite-support sheaf.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Full AC; 0≤r≤3; a coherent analytic module F on Pr(C); a finite support set S; and finite-dimensional complex stalks Fx for x∈S.

[F1]

On compact projective space, every cohomology group of a coherent analytic module is finite-dimensional and Hausdorff in the coherent-section Čech topology (Finite-dimensional coherent cohomology on compact projective space). This example determines the exact dimensions for finite support.

[F2]

For a point inclusion ix:{x}↪X and an abelian group A, the skyscraper sheaf ix,∗A has sections A on opens containing x and 0 on opens not containing x (A skyscraper sheaf of abelian groups at a point).

[F3]

A flasque sheaf has surjective restriction maps to every smaller open set, and every flasque abelian sheaf is acyclic for derived global sections (Flasque abelian sheaves are Γ-acyclic).

[F4]

The stalk Fx consists of germs of sections near x, and a sheaf with zero stalk at every point is the zero sheaf (The stalk of a presheaf at a point).

[F5]

For r≥1, Pr(C) has the stated complex-manifold structure and is Hausdorff by definition (Complex manifolds, holomorphic vector bundles and Hermitian metrics). For r=0, its definition as the space of lines in C gives a singleton, which is Hausdorff. In either case, a finite set of distinct points has pairwise disjoint neighborhoods.

[F6]

A sheaf satisfies unique gluing: sections on an open cover that agree on overlaps glue uniquely (A sheaf on a topological space).

[F7]

Degree-zero right-derived sheaf cohomology is canonically the global-sections group (Sheaf cohomology as right derived global sections).

[A1]

Full AC is the set-choice postulate and is the hypothesis of flasque acyclicity (The Axiom of Choice, Flasque abelian sheaves are Γ-acyclic).

Proof

1.1F1F4F5givenconstruct

By [F1], the cohomology groups in the Statement are finite-dimensional under the stated compactness and coherence assumptions. If S=∅, [F4] makes F=0, so all claims hold with ℓ=0. Suppose S≠∅. When r=0, S consists of the unique point of P0; take its neighborhood to be all of P0. When r≥1, [F5] and finite Hausdorff separation give pairwise disjoint open neighborhoods Vx of the points of S. In either case, on each punctured neighborhood Vx∖{x} every stalk of F vanishes by the definition of S, so the restriction there is the zero sheaf by [F4].

2.1F2F4F6step 1.1given

For each x∈S, the germ map from F∣Vx to the skyscraper sheaf ix,∗Fx is an isomorphism. It is injective on sections because a section with zero germ at x and zero stalk at every other point has zero germ everywhere, hence is zero by the uniqueness clause [F6]. It is surjective on sections over an open W⊆Vx containing x: represent a desired germ by a section on a smaller neighborhood of x, restrict to the punctured overlap where F is zero, and glue that section to zero on W∖{x} using [F6]. For W not containing x, both section groups are zero.

3.1A1F2F3F6step 2.1algebra

The open complement Pr∖S has zero restriction of F, and the neighborhoods Vx are pairwise disjoint. The local isomorphisms of step 2.1 therefore glue to a sheaf isomorphism F≅⨁x∈Six,∗Fx, where the sum is finite. Each skyscraper is flasque by [F2], since every restriction is either the identity or the map onto 0; hence their finite direct sum is flasque. By [F3] and the ambient AC [A1], Hq(Pr,F)=0 for q>0.

4.1F2F7step 3.1given∎

Taking global sections of the finite direct-sum decomposition in step 3.1 and using [F7] gives H0(Pr,F)=Γ(Pr,F)≅⨁x∈SFx. Its dimension is the finite sum ℓ from the Statement.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources