Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck pendingjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Scalar structure-sheaf cohomology of P2

Example

Assume full AC and let X be the complex lines in C3, equivalently X=P2(C)=(C3∖{0})/C×. Use the standard charts Ui={[Z0:Z1:Z2]:Zi≠0} for i=0,1,2, ordered 0<1<2. Let OX be the sheaf of holomorphic functions on X. For each nonempty I⊆{0,1,2} set UI=⋂i∈IUi and define Cp=∏∣I∣=p+1OX(UI)(0≤p≤2),(δc)i0⋯ip+1=∑ν=0p+1(−1)νci0⋯iν^⋯ip+1∣Ui0⋯ip+1, with increasing indices, and Cp=0 for p<0 or p>2; Čech cohomology means the cohomology of this complex. For m=(m0,m1,m2)∈Z3 with m0+m1+m2=0, write N(m)={i:mi<0} and call the degree-zero homogeneous Laurent monomial the mode m; in frame ei(0) its coefficient is ∏j≠i(Zj/Zi)mj. A mode occurs in the Čech component on UI exactly when N(m)⊆I. The zero mode contributes one copy of C in degree zero, every nonzero mode contracts, and therefore H0(X,OX)=C,Hq(X,OX)=0(q>0). The contraction is the ordered three-chart Laurent calculation and its subseries converge locally uniformly on every output intersection. For 0≤q≤2, let AX0,q be the sheaf of smooth antiholomorphic q-forms, with differential the ∂ˉ part of the exterior derivative, and set the terms to zero for q>2. The same groups are the cohomology of the global complex Γ(X,AX0,∙) by the canonical projective Dolbeault comparison.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Full AC; the standard ordered three-chart cover of P2; and the structure sheaf OX.

[A1]

Full AC means every family of nonempty sets has a choice function (The Axiom of Choice).

[F1]

The standard projective charts have coordinates Zj/Zi and cover the complex lines in C3∖{0} (Complex projective space and its holomorphic charts).

[F2]

The line bundle O(0) has identical transition factors and is the trivial line bundle; its holomorphic-section sheaf is OX (Projective twisting line bundles by coordinate transitions).

[F3]

Under full AC, on each nonempty standard-cover intersection, sections of O(k) have unique normally convergent mixed Laurent–Taylor modes; modes occur exactly for N(m)⊆I, restrictions preserve the coefficient, every proper nonempty N(m) mode contracts by the stated insertion formula with locally uniform convergence, and the fixed-cover Čech cohomology computes analytic sheaf cohomology (Laurent–Čech cohomology of the projective coordinate cover).

[F4]

Under full AC and for 0≤r≤3, sheaf cohomology of a holomorphic vector bundle is canonically the cohomology of its global smooth Dolbeault complex (Projective Dolbeault comparison and scalar structure-sheaf cohomology).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1givenalgebra

The degree-zero exponents satisfy m0+m1+m2=0. If N(m)=∅, all three exponents are nonnegative, so their sum is zero only for m=(0,0,0). If N(m)={0,1,2}, all three are negative and their sum is negative, impossible. Thus every other mode has nonempty proper negative set, one of the six sets {0},{1},{2},{0,1},{0,2},{1,2}. The least vertex outside these sets is respectively 1,0,0,2,1,0.

2.1A1F3step 1.1algebra

For each nonzero mode choose its least j∉N(m). On an increasing output index I of size p, put (hmc)I=0 if j∈I and otherwise put (hmc)I=(−1)#{i∈I:i<j}cI∪{j}. For an input index I of size p+1 with j∉I, the term of hmδc deleting j has the same sign as the insertion sign, hence contributes +cI; for every i∈I, the term deleting i in hmδc and the term deleting i in δhmc have opposite signs because the order of inserting j and deleting i is reversed. If j∈I, then hmδc vanishes and the only nonzero term in δhmc deletes j; its two signs agree and give +cI. Terms deleting a vertex of N(m) vanish because the resulting index does not contain N(m). Therefore δhm+hmδ=id in every degree for all six possible N(m).

2.2F2step 1.1algebra

By [F2], the zero mode of the structure sheaf is a scalar constant on each nonempty intersection. Its Čech complex is C0=C3, C1=C3, C2=C, with maps δ0(c0,c1,c2)=(c1−c0,c2−c0,c2−c1) and δ1(a01,a02,a12)=a12−a02+a01. The kernel of δ0 consists exactly of (c,c,c), hence is C. The image of δ0 is the plane a02=a01+a12, which is exactly the kernel of δ1; δ1 is onto because (0,0,1) maps to 1. Thus this mode has H0=C and H1=H2=0.

3.1A1F3step 2.1

The modewise formula defines a homotopy on actual holomorphic cochains: by [F3], each output component is a sum of subseries grouped by at most the three choices of j∉I, each retained mode has no negative exponent at the added coordinate, and the subseries converge locally uniformly on UI. Consequently their sums are holomorphic on UI, including across the added coordinate hyperplane, and the coefficient identity in step 2.1 is an identity of analytic cochains.

4.1A1F3step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1step 2.2algebra

Every nonzero mode is contractible by steps 1.1, 2.1 and 3.1, while the zero mode has the cohomology computed in step 2.2. The unique normally convergent coefficient expansions and their cochain homotopies make this coefficientwise computation valid for holomorphic sections, and [F3] identifies the resulting fixed-cover Čech cohomology with analytic sheaf cohomology. Hence the displayed sheaf-cohomology values follow.

5.1A1F4step 4.1algebra∎

Apply [F4] to the trivial line bundle E=OX. Its global smooth Dolbeault complex has the same cohomology as the sheaf groups computed in step 4.1, giving the asserted Dolbeault-cohomology values.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources