How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Zero-point energy and ground-degeneracy entropy
A direct low-temperature comparison of the one-dimensional harmonic oscillator and the zero-field two-state spin model covered by the linked theorem. It records a model result, not a universal third-law statement or observation.
Example
For an oscillator with gap , the canonical state approaches the nondegenerate ground level, with energy and entropy zero. For the separate spin Hamiltonian , choosing leaves two exactly degenerate states equally occupied at every temperature, with entropy . These model calculations show why ground degeneracy must be included when stating a low-temperature entropy limit.
Verification
Given: (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()), , the oscillator and spin models in Exact quantum oscillator and spin ensembles with their adopted canonical Gibbs preparations, and .
[F1] Exact quantum oscillator and spin ensembles, Statement: oscillator energy tends to and entropy to zero; the spin entropy is when .
Since as , the oscillator formulas give , , and the entropy function in [F1] tends zero.
With , the spin Gibbs weights are both , so independently of . Both conclusions follow from these Hamiltonians together with the adopted canonical Gibbs preparations.