Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A hard core stabilizes an attractive power tail

Example

Fix an integer d≥1 and constants c,ϵ>0. Set p=d+ϵ and define the even radial pair potential ϕatt(x):={+∞,∥x∥2<1,−c∥x∥2−p,∥x∥2≥1. It has a hard core and a nonzero attractive power tail.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The model conventions of Stable power-tempered pair-potential model, d≥1 an integer, and c,ϵ>0.

[F1]

Stable power-tempered pair-potential model defines the pair energy UN, stability, Euclidean norm, and power-tempering bound.

[F3]

The integers as equivalence classes of pairs of naturals: the number of lattice points k∈Zd with ∥k∥∞=m is (2m+1)d−(2m−1)d, by subtracting the integer box of radius m−1 from the box of radius m.

[F4]

Series in the nonnegative extended real line defines the nonnegative series by its partial sums, and The p-series for a real exponent p converges exactly when p is greater than one gives ∑m=2∞m−1−ϵ<∞ because 1+ϵ>1.

Verification

1.1givenF1F2algebra

From the coordinate formula in [F1], ∥x∥2=∑r=1dxr2 is continuous: each coordinate square is continuous by u2−v2=(u−v)(u+v), and for u,v≥0, ∣u−v∣≤∣u−v∣, since, if u≥v, (u−v)2≤(u−v)(u+v)=u−v, with the other case symmetric. Thus the square-root composition is continuous, including at x=0. The map r↦r−p is continuous on r>0 by [F2]. The regions {∥x∥2<1} and {∥x∥2≥1} are Borel, so the piecewise potential is Borel; radiality makes it even. For ∥x∥2≥1, ∣ϕatt(x)∣=c∥x∥2−d−ϵ, so it is power-tempered with C=c and R=1.

1.2givenF1F3constructalgebra

Put δ:=1/(2d). For a fixed particle qi, the half-open cubes Dk:=qi+δk+[0,δ)d, k∈Zd, partition Rd. Their Euclidean diameters are at most d δ=1/2<1. The example's definition makes every pair at distance less than 1 forbidden, so centers in a finite-energy configuration are separated by at least 1. Thus each cube contains at most one center and D0 contains no center other than qi. The cells in max-norm shell m number (2m+1)d−(2m−1)d by [F3]. For m≥1, factor the difference of powers: (2m+1)d−(2m−1)d=2∑r=0d−1(2m+1)d−1−r(2m−1)r≤2d3d−1md−1, since 2m+1≤3m.

2.1givenF2step 1.2algebra

A neighbor of qi in shell m=1 has distance at least 1 and contributes at most c in absolute value; there are 3d−1 such cells. For m≥2, choose a coordinate r with ∣kr∣=m. If kr=m, every point of Dk differs from qi in coordinate r by at least δm; if kr=−m, the absolute difference is greater than δ(m−1). Hence every point of Dk is at Euclidean distance at least δ(m−1) from qi. By [F2], each such neighbor contributes at most cδ−p(m−1)−p. The shell count in step 1.2 therefore bounds its total contribution by 2d3d−1md−1cδ−p(m−1)−d−ϵ.

3.1F3F4step 1.2step 2.1algebra

For m≥2, m−1≥m/2, so the last bound is at most 2d3d−1cδ−p2pm−1−ϵ. Summing over shells and using [F4], every fixed particle satisfies ∑j≠i∣ϕatt(qi−qj)∣≤C∗:=c(3d−1)+2d3d−1cδ−p2p∑m=2∞m−1−ϵ<∞.

4.1F1step 1.1step 3.1algebra∎

For a finite-energy configuration, every pair term is negative and −UN=∑i<j∣ϕatt(qi−qj)∣=12∑i∑j≠i∣ϕatt(qi−qj)∣≤C∗2N by step 3.1. A configuration containing a forbidden pair has UN=+∞ and also satisfies the lower bound. Hence the potential is stable with B=C∗/2. Together with step 1.1, this proves membership in the stated stable power-tempered class.

Remarks

The negative algebraic tail is genuinely attractive at every allowed separation; the hard core and lattice-shell summation give a uniform stability constant. The example does not say that every attractive power tail is stable. The A-page theorem remains a free-cube grand-pressure result and gives no canonical fixed-density or arbitrary-boundary conclusion.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources