How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A singular two-phase equation map with a four-dimensional solution set
Example
Take components and phases on the open coordinate domain . Set all four chemical-potential coordinate functions identically equal to zero. The two coexistence equations then vanish identically, so the solution set is all of and has local dimension four. The regular formula would give , but its nonsingular-minor hypothesis fails because the equation Jacobian is zero.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The stated component and phase counts, open domain, and constant coordinate functions.
Regular rank form of the finite-component phase dimension count: the dimension is conditional on an invertible square derivative minor for the coexistence equation map.
Verification
For , there are coordinates and equations. Since each is identically zero, both differences equal zero at every point of . Thus the zero set is exactly the open set , which is locally parameterized by its four original coordinates.
The derivative of each identically zero equation is the zero covector, so the equation Jacobian has rank zero and no minor is invertible. Therefore [L1] does not apply; the example does not contradict its regular dimension count, and it shows why equation count alone does not determine local dimension.