Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Nonsmooth Equilibrium — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

These leaf examples check the vertical-separator boundary in biconjugation, a whole flat face of Fenchel minimizers, a singular two-phase equation map where equation counting fails, and a water-formation extent at the boundary of its feasible interval. The reaction example verifies stoichiometric feasibility and atom conservation for the displayed finite model only; its chosen objective is mathematical data and is not an empirical or thermodynamic claim.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, postulates, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, experiments and counterexamples

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)Open item page →

A vertical separator and biconjugation outside the domain

Example

Let f:R→{0,+∞} be the indicator of [0,∞): f(y)=0 for y≥0 and f(y)=+∞ for y<0. At z=(−1,0), the epigraph is separated by a vertical hyperplane (one whose coefficient of the epigraph-height coordinate is zero). The conjugate is f∗(p)=0 for p≤0 and +∞ for p>0, so f∗∗(−1)=+∞=f(−1). The affine minorants ℓk(y)=−ky, k≥0, display the unbounded dual values at y=−1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The indicator function just defined and the Euclidean coordinates (y,s) on its epigraph.

[F1]

Proper, convex, and lower-semicontinuous extended-real functions on Euclidean space: properness, convexity, lower semicontinuity, and the epigraph use the stated extended-real conventions.

[F2]

Fenchel conjugate, biconjugate, and subdifferential: f∗(p)=sup⁡y∈dom⁡f(py−f(y)) and f∗∗(x) is the supremum over p with finite f∗(p).

[F3]

Extended-real convexity and lower semicontinuity are characterized by the epigraph: convexity and lower semicontinuity are equivalent to convexity and closedness of the epigraph.

[L1]

Strictly separate a point from a nonempty closed convex Euclidean set: a point outside a nonempty closed convex Euclidean set has a strict linear separator.

[L2]

Finite-dimensional Fenchel-Moreau biconjugation: a proper closed convex extended-real function on finite-dimensional Euclidean space equals its biconjugate.

Verification

technique · direct calculation
1.1F1F3L1givenalgebra

The domain is [0,∞), so it is nonempty and f is proper. Its epigraph is E={(y,s):y≥0, s≥0}, a nonempty closed convex set; [F3] therefore makes f closed and convex. The point (−1,0) lies outside E. With u=(−1,0) and c=0, every (y,s)∈E satisfies ⟨u,(y,s)⟩=−y≤0<1=⟨u,(−1,0)⟩, so this is the strict vertical separator; its height coefficient is zero.

1.2F2givenalgebrachoose

For p≤0 and y≥0, py≤0, with equality at y=0, so f∗(p)=0. For p>0, given any real M choose y>max⁡{0,M/p}; then py>M, so the defining supremum is +∞. Therefore dom⁡f∗=(−∞,0].

2.1F2step 1.2algebrachoose

At x=−1, the biconjugate is sup⁡p≤0(−p−f∗(p))=sup⁡p≤0(−p)=+∞: for every real bound M, the admissible choice p=−max⁡{M,0}−1 gives −p>M. Thus f∗∗(−1)=f(−1).

3.1F2L2step 1.2step 2.1algebra∎

For each k≥0 and y≥0, ℓk(y)=−ky≤0=f(y), so ℓk is an affine minorant. Its value at −1 is k, and the conjugate choice p=−k has f∗(−k)=0, so the same family realizes arbitrarily large dual values at the point outside the domain. The conclusion is consistent with the full equality in [L2].

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)Open item page →

A flat exposed face with many Fenchel minimizers

Example

Let f be the indicator of [−1,1]. The zero tilt f(y)−0⋅y has every point of the interval as a minimizer, and f∗(0)=0 is attained at every such point. Equivalently, 0∈∂f(x) for every x∈[−1,1]. Thus the supporting face at slope zero is the whole interval, and coercive Fenchel attainment need not be unique.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The indicator f(x)=0 for x∈[−1,1] and f(x)=+∞ otherwise.

[F1]

Proper, convex, and lower-semicontinuous extended-real functions on Euclidean space: the indicator of a nonempty closed convex set is proper, closed, and convex in the given conventions.

[F2]

Fenchel conjugate, biconjugate, and subdifferential: f∗(p) is the supremum of py−f(y) over y∈dom⁡f, and p∈∂f(x) means f(y)≥f(x)+p(y−x) for all y.

[F3]

Extended-real convexity and lower semicontinuity are characterized by the epigraph: a proper indicator with a closed convex epigraph is closed and convex in the local extended-real conventions.

[L1]

Fenchel inequality and its equality condition: equality in Fenchel's inequality at a finite point is equivalent to the subgradient condition and attainment of the conjugate supremum.

[L2]

A coercive Fenchel tilt attains its minimum and conjugate supremum: if the closed proper convex tilt is coercive, it has a finite global minimum and the conjugate supremum is attained, without a uniqueness conclusion.

Verification

technique · direct calculation
1.1F1F2F3given

The epigraph is [−1,1]×[0,∞), a nonempty closed convex rectangle, and the domain [−1,1] is nonempty; hence the indicator is proper, closed, and convex by [F1, F3]. At slope p=0, every y∈[−1,1] contributes 0 to the conjugate supremum, and no other y is in the effective domain, so f∗(0)=0 and every point of the interval attains this supremum.

2.1F2L1step 1.1algebra

Fix any x∈[−1,1]. For every y∈R, f(y)≥0=f(x)+0(y−x): equality holds on the interval and the left side is +∞ outside it. Hence 0∈∂f(x); [L1] also gives f∗(0)=0=0⋅x−f(x) at each such x.

3.1L2step 1.1algebra∎

The zero tilt is g=f. It is coercive as an extended-real function: for any M∈R, choosing R=2 ensures ∣x∣≥R implies g(x)=+∞>M. Its minimum is 0, attained at every x∈[−1,1], so this example satisfies [L2] while exhibiting nonuniqueness and a whole flat supporting face.

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)Open item page →

A singular two-phase equation map with a four-dimensional solution set

Example

Take C=2 components and P=2 phases on the open coordinate domain U=(0,∞)2×(0,1)2⊂R4. Set all four chemical-potential coordinate functions μiα identically equal to zero. The two coexistence equations then vanish identically, so the solution set is all of U and has local dimension four. The regular formula would give C−P+2=2, but its nonsingular-minor hypothesis fails because the equation Jacobian is zero.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The stated component and phase counts, open domain, and constant coordinate functions.

[L1]

Regular rank form of the finite-component phase dimension count: the dimension C−P+2 is conditional on an invertible square derivative minor for the coexistence equation map.

Verification

technique · direct calculation
1.1givenalgebra

For C=P=2, there are n=2+2(2−1)=4 coordinates and q=2(2−1)=2 equations. Since each μiα is identically zero, both differences μi2−μi1 equal zero at every point of U. Thus the zero set is exactly the open set U, which is locally parameterized by its four original coordinates.

2.1L1step 1.1algebra∎

The derivative of each identically zero equation is the zero covector, so the equation Jacobian has rank zero and no 2×2 minor is invertible. Therefore [L1] does not apply; the example does not contradict its regular dimension count, and it shows why equation count alone does not determine local dimension.

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)Open item page →

Water formation at a boundary of the feasible extent interval

Example

For the reaction 2 H2+O2→2 H2O, let extent ξ and species amounts use moles. The dimensionless stoichiometric column is ν=(−2,−1,2)T in the species order (H2,O2,H2O), and take n0=(2,1,0)T. Then the feasible extent interval is [0,1], and at ξ=0 the tangent cone permits only forward directions h≥0. The matrix of hydrogen and oxygen atom counts annihilates ν. For the explicitly mathematical objective Φ(n)=nH2O, the induced extent function is f(ξ)=2ξ and has a boundary minimum at zero. This is a stoichiometric calculation, not a claim about chemical equilibrium or a measured system.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The reaction vector, initial amounts, extent convention, and linear objective in the Example.

[L1]

The feasible tangent cone for nonnegative stoichiometric amounts: the feasible tangent cone is determined by nonnegative changes in species whose amounts are zero at the point; the extent derivative is νTμ for a differentiable potential.

Verification

technique · direct calculation
1.1givenalgebra

The species-amount vector is n(ξ)=n0+νξ=(2−2ξ,1−ξ,2ξ)T. Nonnegativity of its third component requires ξ≥0, and nonnegativity of its first two components requires ξ≤1; hence the feasible set is exactly [0,1].

1.2givenalgebra

The elemental count matrix is D=(202021), with first row counting hydrogen atoms and second row oxygen atoms per molecule. Direct multiplication gives Dν=(−4+4,−2+2)T=(0,0)T, so every change n(ξ)−n0=νξ preserves both atom totals.

2.1L1step 1.1algebra

At ξ∗=0, only the water component is zero. Its directional change is (νh)3=2h, so [L1] gives TF(0)={h:2h≥0}=[0,∞). A negative direction is infeasible because it would make the water amount 2ξ negative.

3.1L1step 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

For Φ(n)=n3, the induced function is f(ξ)=Φ(n(ξ))=2ξ. Its derivative at 0 is Df(0)h=2h≥0 for every feasible tangent h≥0, and f(ξ)≥f(0) for every ξ∈[0,1]. This verifies the boundary first-order condition and minimum directly for this chosen mathematical objective.

Sources