Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Canonical mean and variance for a two-level system

Facts & Assumptions

Given: As stated in the item.

[F1]

Countable canonical model: the finite partition sum and normalized state weights are defined as stated there.

[F2]

Summable canonical differentiation: a finite energy list has the required local summable moment envelope on every compact parameter interval (each of finitely many terms is bounded there), so −∂βlog⁡Z is the mean and ∂β2log⁡Z is the variance.

[A1]

E0=0, E1=ε>0, g0=g1=1, and β>0.

Example

Let the state set be {0,1}, with energies E0=0, E1=ε>0, unit weights, and β>0. Writing q=e−βε, the excited-state probability is q/(1+q), the mean energy is εq/(1+q), and the energy variance is ε2q/(1+q)2>0.

Verification

Given: The finite canonical model [F1] with data [A1].

1.1F1A1algebra

Direct summation gives Z=1+e−βε=1+q, hence p1=q/(1+q) and p0=1/(1+q).

2.1F1F2A1step 1.1algebra∎

The finite weighted sum gives Eˉ=εp1=εq/(1+q). The second centered moment is p0(0−Eˉ)2+p1(ε−Eˉ)2=ε2q/(1+q)2, which is positive because q∈(0,1). The values also agree with the finite-list derivative identities of [F2].

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources