Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-11-05 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Pole bounds for the Jacobi quotient at a finite divisor

Statement

Use the modules, ring Rn, module T, and explicit submodule J of the multipoint Jacobi-quotient lemma. Let s be one of za or za−zb with a≠b, and put D={zi:1≤i≤n}∪{zi−zj:1≤i<j≤n},Bs=C[z1,…,zn][t−1:t∈D, t∉C×s]. Thus the localization excludes every nonzero scalar multiple of s, including −s when a>b, and Rn=Bs[s−1]. Its geometric domain includes the smooth part of the divisor s=0 away from all other boundary divisors. Fix a homogeneous input tuple of total weight σ, and fix an insertion l with ∂zls=1 or −1. The associated formal scalar coefficient f satisfies an equation ∂zlmf+∑j=0m−1cjsj−m∂zljf=0,cj∈Bs, for some m≥1, with coefficients independent of the intertwiners. In particular, after fixing the other coordinates near a smooth point of this divisor, this equation is a Fuchsian scalar equation. This statement concerns one finite divisor at a time; it does not assert convergence of a formal solution or a simultaneous expansion at intersections of divisors.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The homogeneous tuple, divisor and derivative direction in the statement. All pole orders below are along this one divisor.

[F1]

Finite generation of the multipoint Jacobi quotient gives the relations Ai,C,D, their finite expansions, terminating strict integral weight reduction to a fixed finite-dimensional tensor cutoff E=(⨂iWi)≤M, annihilation of J by the formal coefficient map, and the derivative identity.

[F2]

Starting with the field C, Hilbert basis theorem: if R is Noetherian then R[x] is Noetherian and Every quotient and every localisation of a Noetherian ring is Noetherian give polynomial and localization Noetherianity, hence Noetherianity of Bs. Then Submodules of finite modules over a Noetherian ring are finite by induction makes every submodule of Bs⊗E finite.

Proof

1.1givenF1algebra

For real r let GrT be the span of s−pbv with p≥0, b∈Bs, and homogeneous tensor v of weight τ satisfying p+τ≤r. We check the reduction in F1 preserves this filtration. For a relation obtained from a positive integral weight state u∈Vd and a base tuple of weight τ, its designated u−1 term has weight τ+d. Ordinary-mode terms have weight τ+d−k−1; their coefficient has pole order at most k+1. Opposite-mode terms u−1−k∗ have weight τ−d−k and their coefficients are regular at every finite divisor. These bounds cover every term of Ai and C, including za=0 and za=zb. Thus each has pole order plus tensor weight at most τ+d.

2.1F1step 1.1algebra

In D, the last opposite-mode term has weight τ−d. A term L(1)aukL(1)b in Ki(uk) has weight shift d−k−1−a−b and scalar factor a constant times zi2(d−k−1)−a−b. After multiplication by zik+1 in D, its scalar power is zi2d−k−1−a−b. At a collision divisor, or a zero divisor other than zi=0, this factor is regular. At zi=0 its pole order is max⁡(0,k+1+a+b−2d); adding its weight shift gives either d−k−1−a−b≤d or −d≤d. All terms of D therefore satisfy the same bound. Multiplication by an existing s−pb preserves the bound additively. Every non-designated term also has strictly smaller tensor weight, exactly as in F1.

3.1F1step 1.1step 2.1choosealgebra

Apply the terminating reductions of F1, keeping the scalar factors rather than discarding their poles. Steps 1.1–2.1 show that every element of GrT has a representative in (Rn⊗E)∩GrT modulo J∩GrT. Let B be a common lower bound for the total tensor weights. Choose S such that σ+S is a nonnegative integer and S+B≥0. Set bk=w0⊗⋯⊗L(−1)kwl⊗⋯⊗wn+1 and choose a reduced representative vk∈(Rn⊗E)∩Gσ+kT with bk−vk∈J. In each term s−pbv of vk, the bound p+wt(v)≤σ+k implies p≤σ+k+S. Consequently qk=sσ+k+Svk belongs to the finite Bs-module Bs⊗E. The exponent is an integer for every k.

4.1F1F2step 3.1algebra

The submodule generated by q0,q1,… is finite by F2. Express a finite generating set as finite combinations of these vectors; for some m≥1 the initial segment q0,…,qm−1 therefore generates the entire submodule. There are cj∈Bs such that qm+∑j<mcjqj=0. Divide in Rn⊗E by sσ+m+S to get vm+∑j<mcjsj−mvj=0. Subtracting the relations bk−vk∈J gives the same identity for the classes [bk]∈T/J. Applying F1's annihilating coefficient map and its derivative identity proves the displayed equation. No differentiation of the chosen representatives vk is used.

5.1step 4.1algebra∎

Write ϵ=∂zls∈{1,−1} and keep the other coordinates fixed, so ∂zl=ϵ∂s. After division by ϵm the equation has the same form in ∂s, with coefficients c~j=ϵj−mcj holomorphic at the chosen smooth divisor point. Put Uj=sj∂sjf, 0≤j<m. Then s∂sUj=jUj+Uj+1 for j<m−1, and s∂sUm−1=(m−1)Um−1−∑j<mc~jUj. Hence s∂sU=A(s)U with A holomorphic there, the explicit Fuchsian first-order system. This proves precisely the asserted pole bound and its Fuchsian interpretation.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources