Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-11-05 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite generation of the multipoint Jacobi quotient

Statement

Let n≥1 and let W0,…,Wn+1 be C1-cofinite, quasi-finite-dimensional grading-restricted generalized modules with real weights over a conformal vertex algebra of CFT type. Put Rn=C[z1±1,…,zn±1,(zi−zj)−1:i<j],T=Rn⊗W0⊗⋯⊗Wn+1. The Jacobi-relation submodule J defined explicitly below has the following properties: there is a real M such that T=J+Rn⊗(⨂iWi)≤M, and the latter weight-cutoff space is finite dimensional. In particular T/J is finitely generated over Rn. Every scalar coefficient of a composable product of logarithmic intertwining operators with inputs W1,…,Wn+1 and target W0′ annihilates J, when interpreted in its formal radial expansion. For each fixed tuple of inputs and each l=1,…,n, there are ml≥1 and ak,l∈Rn, independent of the intertwiners, such that its scalar coefficient φ satisfies ∂zlmlφ+∑k=1mlak,l∂zlml−kφ=0 in the formal radial expansion. No assertion of analytic convergence or regular singularities is made.

For notation write Ui(a) for applying an operator a to tensor factor i and leaving the other factors alone; w=w0⊗⋯⊗wn+1. For a homogeneous u∈Vd, d>0, let uk∗ be the opposite mode on any factor, equivalently the adjoint of the ordinary mode uk on its contragredient. Define the finite-on-each-vector conjugated operator Ki(uk)=ezi−1L(1)(−zi2)L(0)uk(−zi−2)L(0)e−zi−1L(1). The middle conjugation is multiplication of uk by the integral power (−zi2)d−k−1; thus this definition uses no branch on module weights. Let J be the Rn-span of the following vectors for all such u,w and all i=1,…,n: Ai=∑k≥0(−1)k(−zi)kU0(u−1−k∗)w−Ui(u−1)w−∑j≠i∑k≥0(−1)k(−(zi−zj))−1−kUj(uk)w−∑k≥0(−1)k(−zi)−1−kUn+1(uk)w, C=U0(u−1∗)w−∑i=1n∑k≥0(−1)kzi−1−kUi(uk)w−Un+1(u−1)w, D=U0(u−1)w−∑i=1n∑k≥0(−1)kzi1+kUi(Ki(uk))w−Un+1(u−1∗)w.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The modules, tensor product, ring and relations in the statement, with the trivial auxiliary group grading.

[F1]

C1-cofinite generalized module in the ungraded HLZ convention and Quasi-finite-dimensional generalized module supply finite-dimensional positive-state (-1)-mode quotients and finite real weight cutoffs.

[F2]

Opposite fields under formal coordinate inversion supplies the opposite modes, their weight shift k+1−d, and coordinate inversion; The restricted dual with opposite action is a contragredient module identifies the opposite action as the transpose on restricted duals.

[F3]

Logarithmic intertwining operator supplies Jacobi and the derivative property of each operator in the product.

[F4]

Hilbert basis theorem: if R is Noetherian then R[x] is Noetherian, Every quotient and every localisation of a Noetherian ring is Noetherian and Submodules of finite modules over a Noetherian ring are finite by induction supply respectively polynomial Noetherianity, localization Noetherianity, and finite generation of submodules of finite modules over a Noetherian ring.

Proof

1.1givenF1F2algebra

Every displayed sum is finite on w. For ordinary uk this is module truncation; for u−1−k∗ it is upper truncation of the opposite field. The operator L(1) is locally nilpotent on each module because it lowers real weight by one and the weights are bounded below. Hence both exponentials in Ki are finite on the vector where they act, and the k sum is finite after the right exponential is expanded. Expanding Ki gives Laurent-polynomial scalar coefficients: a term L(1)aukL(1)b has weight shift d−k−1−a−b. Thus the three families are actual elements of T.

1.2F1algebra

Choose finite homogeneous representatives Pi⊂Wi for Wi/C1(Wi). They exist because C1(Wi) is graded and the quotient is finite dimensional. Choose M at least the largest sum of weights in P0⊗⋯⊗Pn+1. Decompose each factor as a representative plus a sum of u−1w terms. Consequently every homogeneous tensor of weight s>M is a sum of tensors with at least one such factor; any term with all representative factors has weight at most M and hence cannot occur in its weight-s component.

2.1F1F2step 1.1step 1.2algebra

Reduce a factor u−1wi with 1≤i≤n by Ai, the last factor by C, or factor zero by D. The designated term has total weight σ+d, where σ is the weight before insertion. Every other term of Ai or C has weight either σ−d−k or σ+d−k−1, hence strictly less. In D, step 1.1 shows that every finite-factor term has weight σ+d−k−1−a−b<σ+d and its last term has weight σ−d. All changes are integral, and all tensor weights have a common real lower bound. Thus each sequence of reductions terminates after finitely many strict integer weight decreases. Applying step 1.2 at each remaining weight above M proves T=J+Rn⊗(⨂iWi)≤M. This argument needs no induction over a nondiscrete ordering of real numbers.

2.2F2F3step 1.1algebra

For completeness the annihilation assertion uses actual Jacobi residues rather than an arbitrary quotient. Insert the current Y(u,t) into the formal product of intertwiners. Apply intertwiner Jacobi successively across each insertion; it equates the expansion at infinity paired with w0 with the sum of residues at t=zi and t=0. Take the residue with multiplier (t−zi)−1. At infinity its expansion is ∑k≥0zikt−1−k; at zj, j≠i, its expansion is ∑k≥0(−1)k(zj−zi)−1−k(t−zj)k; at zero it is ∑k≥0(−1)k(−zi)−1−ktk. At zi the residue is u−1. Pairing the infinity expansion transposes ordinary modes to u−1−k∗ on W0. These four contributions are precisely Ai, since (−1)k(−zi)k=zik. Taking multiplier t−1 instead gives C, by the expansion t−1=∑k≥0(−1)kzi−1−k(t−zi)k at zi. All equalities are formal residues of Jacobi with the displayed binomial expansions, so no analytic contour deformation is assumed.

3.1F1step 2.1algebra

If Bi is a lower weight bound for Wi, each factor of a tensor of total weight at most M has weight at most M−∑j≠iBj. Its span is therefore contained in the tensor product of finitely many finite cutoff spaces, finite dimensional by F1 (use a strict cutoff larger by one). Choose a finite basis of that subspace. Its image generates T/J over Rn, proving finite generation.

3.2F2F3step 2.2algebra

Apply the same t−1 residue after changing the global coordinate to t−1, interchanging zero and infinity. The finite insertion coordinates become zi−1; their state transformation is A(zi) and its inverse. F2 gives the exact conjugation of the local uk action as Ki(uk); the coefficient (−1)k(zi−1)−1−k is (−1)kzi1+k. The infinity and zero terms are respectively u−1 on W0 and u−1∗ on Wn+1. Thus this residue is exactly D. Steps 2.2 and 3.2 prove annihilation of every generator, and Rn-linearity in its specified radial expansion proves annihilation of J.

4.1F3F4step 3.1step 3.2algebra∎

The field C is Noetherian, since its only ideals are zero and itself. Iterating the polynomial result and localizing at the multiplicative system of coordinates and their differences makes Rn Noetherian. For fixed l set bj=[w0⊗⋯⊗L(−1)jwl⊗⋯⊗wn+1]∈T/J. Its Rn-span is a submodule of the finite module in step 3.1, hence is finitely generated. Express finitely many generators as finite combinations of the bj, and let ml−1 be at least every index that occurs. Thus b0,…,bml−1 generate that span and bml+∑k=1mlak,lbml−k=0 for some ak,l∈Rn. Applying the coefficient map from steps 2.2–2.2 and using the derivative identity of each intertwiner turns bj into ∂zljφ. This proves the claimed scalar differential equations as formal identities. It gives no pole-order estimate for their coefficients at a boundary divisor.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources