Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-11-04 (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Virasoro vacuum construction, minimal-model cofiniteness, and vacuum unitarity

Statement

For every c∈C, the induced vacuum module Vc=U(Vir)⊗U(span⁡{C,Ln:n≥−1})Cc has its universal conformal vertex-algebra structure and a unique simple CFT-type quotient L(c,0). Here C acts by c and every Ln, n≥−1, kills the inducing vacuum. For coprime p,q≥2, set cp,q=1−6(p−q)2/(pq) and D=(p−1)(q−1)/2. Then dim⁡L(cp,q,0)/C2(L(cp,q,0))≤D. For real c<1, a positive-definite invariant Hermitian form on the simple vacuum module exists exactly when c=1−6/(m(m+1)) for an integer m≥2. The form is conjugate-linear in the first variable and satisfies Ln†=L−n and C†=C. Consequently among the coprime minimal parameters the vacuum form exists exactly for ∣p−q∣=1. No complete simple-module classification, Zhu-ideal factorization or rationality conclusion is asserted.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The parameters and mode/form conventions of the Statement. Write P(n) for the partition number, with P(n)=0 for n<0. All fields and Fock spaces used in the proof are algebraic; no Hilbert completion or analytic sewing is required.

[F1]

Virasoro algebra in the Lm convention, Virasoro Verma modules and contravariant forms and PBW basis and grades of Virasoro Verma modules supply the Virasoro bracket, induced module, normalized contravariant form, and ordered PBW basis with its unique simple quotient.

[F2]

Kac determinant for Virasoro Verma modules proves the all-complex-parameter determinant with its nonzero constant independent of c,h and b. Every determinant use below is that proved polynomial identity.

[F3]

Mutually local creative generators determine a state–field map constructs the unique vertex algebra from creative, translation-covariant mutually local spanning fields. Its proof gives the finite normal-product mode formulas used to identify ideals.

[F4]

Jacobi and residue calculus from the state-field locality axioms supplies state Jacobi, translation of state fields and mode derivative/weight identities. Conformal vertex algebra of CFT type fixes CFT type, and C2-cofiniteness defines the actual C2 quotient.

[F5]

Sugawara modes and their normal ordering, Sugawara modes act on affine currents with weight one and Sugawara modes satisfy Virasoro at every noncritical complex level give locally finite, basis-independent Sugawara modes on every restricted affine-current module at noncritical level, with their exact current commutator and central charge. These are the actual published module interfaces, not an assumed integrable branching theorem.

Proof

1.1F1givenalgebra

For c∈C put bvac=span⁡{C,Ln:n≥−1}; it is a Lie subalgebra. Let Cc be its one-dimensional representation with C=c and every Ln=0. It is consistent: the central bracket coefficient vanishes for n=−1,0,1, so no bracket within bvac gives a nonzero scalar. Set Vc=U(Vir⁡)⊗U(bvac)Cc. PBW with the negative block {L−n:n≥2} proves that the ordered monomials L−n1⋯L−nr1, n1≥⋯≥nr≥2, are a basis. In particular 1≠0, V0c=C1, every homogeneous degree is finite dimensional, and L0 acts by its nonnegative integer degree.

2.1F1givenalgebrastep 1.1

Let T=L−1 and Ω(z)=∑n∈ZLnz−n−2. It is a field on Vc: a positive Ln lowers the degree by n, so kills a fixed homogeneous vector when n exceeds its degree. We have T1=0 and [T,Ln]=−(n+1)Ln−1, proving [T,Ω(z)]=∂_zΩ(z). For ω=L−21, repeated brackets give Tjω=j!L−j−21, so Ω(z)1=ezTω.

3.1F1F3givenalgebrastep 2.1

The Virasoro commutator gives the exact distribution identity [Ω(z),Ω(w)]=∂wΩ(w)δ(z,w)+2Ω(w)∂wδ(z,w)+(c/12)∂w3δ(z,w). For example the coefficients of the central term are (c/12)(m+1)m(m−1)δm+n,0 in the Lm,Ln convention. The identities (z−w)δ=0 and (z−w)∂wjδ=j∂wj−1δ imply (z−w)4[Ω(z),Ω(w)]=0. Thus Ω is local with itself. Its negative field modes are Ω(m)=Lm−1, m<0, hence are precisely the L−n, n≥2, which span Vc on the vacuum by PBW. All four hypotheses of the actual reconstruction lemma are now verified. It supplies the unique vertex-algebra state-field map with Y(ω,z)=Ω(z). The Virasoro relations, T=L−1, and the proved nonnegative finite grading verify the local conformal-vertex-algebra definition for Vc.

4.1F1F3F4givenalgebrastep 3.1

A Virasoro-stable subspace U⊂Vc is stable under every reconstructed state mode. Indeed every state is a linear combination of the negative Ω-mode words above. The field of Ω_{(−k)}b is the corresponding negative field product, obtained inductively by the actual reconstruction proof. Its coefficient on a fixed vector is a finite sum of compositions of Ω-modes and modes of the shorter state's field, by the explicit iterate formula in that supplier. Induction on the state word therefore proves preservation of U. Conversely a vertex ideal is stable under Ω-modes. Thus the two notions coincide. Translation is already an Ω-mode. Every Virasoro-stable subspace is graded, since L0 has distinct integer eigenvalues and polynomial interpolation projects the finite support of any vector to its components. A proper one has no grade-zero vector, since 1 generates Vc. The sum J of all proper Virasoro submodules still has zero grade-zero space, so is proper; it is the unique maximal proper submodule. By the preceding paragraph it is a vertex ideal, and L(c,0)=Vc/J is a simple vertex algebra with the descended conformal vector. Its vacuum remains nonzero, its grade-zero space is C1, and its grades are finite dimensional and nonnegative. Thus it is a simple conformal vertex algebra of CFT type exactly as used by the minimal-model Statement. This includes c=0: the simple quotient may be C with zero conformal vector, which the local definition allows. No nonzero-conformal-vector or nontriviality assumption has been silently added.

5.1F1F2givenalgebrastep 4.1

Let BN(c) be the real PBW Gram matrix on the universal vacuum quotient Vc=M(c,0)/U(Vir⁡)L−11, using partitions of N with all parts≥2. It is polynomial in real c. If GN(c,h) is the Verma Gram matrix, then generically in c det⁡BN(c)=2−P(N−1)lim⁡h→0det⁡GN(c,h)/(hP(N−1)det⁡GN−1(c,1)). To verify this, choose at grade N the PBW block consisting of all descendants of L−1vh and the complementary PBW block with no rightmost L−1. All entries pairing a descendant of L−1vh with any vector vanish at h=0, because L−1v0 is singular and lies in the radical. The first block, divided by 2h, tends to the normalized Verma form of weight1: moving positive modes across the pairing proves contravariance in the limit, the top pairing is 2h, and the order-h errors in the positive-mode highest-vector equations vanish after pairing against the other singular-descendant block. More explicitly L1L−1vh=2hvh and LnL−1vh=0 for n>1; pairing the exceptional vh term against a descendant of L−1vh introduces one more factor h by the preceding radical vanishing. Thus the limit is the unique normalized contravariant form on M(c,1). The off-diagonal blocks are O(h). When det GN−1(c,1) is nonzero, the Schur complement of the first block therefore tends to BN(c), giving the displayed formula. It extends as an identity of rational functions in c and then by polynomial continuation wherever cancellation is needed.

6.1F1givenalgebrastep 5.1

For sufficiently large positive c, BN(c) is positive definite. Rescale a PBW vector of length l by c−l/2. At c→+∞ only complete central contractions survive. Two distinct partitions have no complete matched central contraction, and the limiting matrix is diagonal with entries ∏n≥2mn!((n3−n)/12)mn>0. Every noncentral commutator lowers the power of c after this scaling. Hence the determinant is positive at sufficiently large c.

7.1F1F2givenalgebrastep 6.1

The Kac factors locate every possible zero of BN. Put c=1−6(b−b−1)2 and hr,s=((rb−sb−1)2−(b−b−1)2)/4. Apart from the identically zero h1,1, a zero at h=0 solves (r−1)b2=s−1 or (r+1)b2=s+1. For a reduced positive ratio b2=q/p, p,q≥2 coprime, the first possible additional zero occurs at (r,s)=(p−1,q−1), grade N0=(p−1)(q−1); the other family begins at (p+1,q+1), and multiples have larger grade. Ratios with p=1 or q=1 give c≤−2 and do not occur at positive c. At c=1 the numerator zeros with r=s≥2 cancel the denominator zeros with ∣r−s∣=2: the numerator factor hr,r=(r2−1)(1−c)/24 is simple in c, while the pair of denominator factors with indices (s+2,s),(s,s+2) has a simple product zero in c (their individual leading terms are opposite nonzero multiples of 1−c). Their multiplicities match because N−1−s(s+2)=N−(s+1)2. Thus c=1 is not an extra zero of BN. For c>1, choose b with the stated central charge and put u=b2. A numerator zero at h=0 forces u>0 by the two equations above. A denominator zero requires hr,s=1, equivalently (r2−1)u2−2(rs+1)u+(s2−1)=0. For r>1 its roots are (s−1)/(r+1) and (s+1)/(r−1); after discarding a zero root, every remaining root is positive. For r=1 its only possible nonzero root is (s−1)/2, which is positive. Thus every such root is positive, which gives c=1−6(u−1)2/u≤1, a contradiction. So neither numerator nor denominator has a nontrivial Kac zero for c>1, and BN has no zero there.

8.1F1F2givenalgebrastep 7.1

For coprime p,q≥2 put c=1−6(p−q)2/(pq), N=(p−1)(q−1), D=N/2. This proof uses the actual all-parameter Kac determinant and the universal vacuum construction. It proves the original minimal-model C2 clause, including a nonzero pure L−2 coefficient; it does not assume a Feigin–Fuchs singular-vector formula or classify modules. Use the vacuum determinant identity proved above: det⁡Bn(c)=2−P(n−1)lim⁡h→0det⁡Gn(c,h)/(hP(n−1)det⁡Gn−1(c,1)). Here Bn is the Gram matrix on the universal vacuum module in its parts≥2 PBW basis. At b²=q/p, the positive-index solutions of hr,s(c)=0, other than (1,1), have (r,s)=(kp−1,kq−1) or (kp+1,kq+1), with k≥1. Their first grade is N, attained only by (p−1,q−1). The positive-index solutions of hr,s(c)=1 have (r,s)=(kp+1,kq−1) or (kp−1,kq+1), k≥1; their first grades are (p+1)(q−1) and (p−1)(q+1), both strictly greater than N. These statements follow by solving qr−ps=±(p−q) or ±(p+q), respectively, using gcd(p,q)=1. Thus the determinant formula makes every Bn with n<N nondegenerate and BN degenerate. The exceptional h1,1 factor is exactly the factor hP(n−1) removed before the limit. The derivative of the additional h=0 Kac factor at this parameter is nonzero (b>0 and b≠1), so the formula has a simple zero at n=N, though only existence of a null vector is needed. Choose v≠0 in the radical of BN. Contravariance makes Lm v orthogonal to every vector of grade N−m, for every m>0. When N−m≥0, that grade is nondegenerate by the preceding paragraph, so Lmv=0; when N−m<0 it vanishes by the vacuum grading. Hence v is an actual singular vector, not just a vector with determinant zero. The integer N is even: if p and q are both odd, both p−1,q−1 are even; otherwise one of them is even because p,q cannot both be even.

9.1F1F4givenalgebrastep 8.1

Filter the vacuum PBW space by word length in the modes L−n, n≥2. Its associated graded is the polynomial ring C[x2,x3,…], where xn is the symbol of L−n; at a fixed conformal degree only finitely many variables and words occur. On the top-length symbol, every positive Lm acts as the derivation Dm=∑n≥m+2(m+n)xn−m∂/∂xn. Indeed [Lm,L−n]=(m+n)Lm−n plus a central term. When n≥m+2 the new negative mode still has index at most−2 and preserves word length. When n=m+1 it is L−1; moving it to the right until it kills the vacuum replaces two negative factors by one in every surviving commutator. When n=m it is L0 or the scalar central term and lowers length by at least one; when n<m the positive mode must commute through another factor before surviving, again lowering length. Thus there are no other top-length contributions. Lower-length components of v cannot contribute at its top length under any positive mode.

10.1F1givenalgebrastep 9.1

Let f be the nonzero highest-length symbol of v. Singularity gives Dmf=0 for every m≥1. If xR, R>2, is the largest variable occurring in f, then DR−2f=(2R−2)x2∂f/∂xR, because no variable of index greater than R occurs. The polynomial ring is an integral domain in characteristic zero, so f is independent of xR, a contradiction. Repeating removes every variable except x2. Homogeneity of v forces f=ax2D with a≠0. Therefore v has a nonzero coefficient of L−2D1, and every other PBW monomial in it has at least one part≥3. This proves the needed coefficient, rather than asserting it from determinant vanishing.

11.1F1F4givenalgebrastep 10.1

Let L(c,0) be the simple quotient of the constructed universal vacuum module. The vector v is in its proper radical, so its image is zero. Any PBW monomial with some part n≥3 is in C2 of this quotient: order that part leftmost, write L−n=ω(−n+1), and use the state derivative formula (Tn−3ω)(−2)=(n−2)!ω(−n+1). Thus v=0 gives a nonzero multiple of L−2D1 equal to a linear combination of C2 vectors. Moreover the span of PBW monomials with a part≥3 is stable under L−2: reorder using [L−2,L−n]=(n−2)L−n−2, whose new index remains at least3. Applying L−2 repeatedly to the relation therefore places every pure power L−2j1, j≥D, in C2 as well. All remaining PBW monomials already lie in C2 by the same leftmost-part argument. Consequently L(c,0)/C2 is spanned by 1, L−21,…,L−2D−11 and has dimension at most D. The case p,q=2,3 gives N=2,D=1 and the one-dimensional trivial quotient, as expected.

12.1F1F2givenalgebrastep 11.1

Set cm=1−6/[m(m+1)], m≥2. Fix cm<c<cm+1 and N=m(m+1)=A. There is precisely one possible determinant zero above cm, namely cm+1, and it is simple. Here is the elementary bound excluding every other rational root. If cp,q>cm, with d=∣p−q∣, then pq>d2A. The increasing function x−sqrt(d²+4x)+1 gives (p−1)(q−1)>d²A−d(2m+1)+1. For d≥2 this is greater than A: (d2−1)m(m+1)−d(2m+1)+1>0 for m≥2, starting already at d=2 and increasing thereafter. If d=1, write q=p+1. Then cp,p+1>cm implies p≥m+1, while (p−1)p≤A implies p≤m+1. Thus only p=m+1,q=m+2 occurs, with N0=A. At that root the additional Kac factor has multiplicity P(0)=1. The denominator det GN−1(c,1) is nonzero there: the equation hr,s=1 gives qr−ps=±(p+q), whose first positive solutions are (p+1,q−1) and (p−1,q+1), both of product greater than N−1. There are no other h=0 numerator factors at grade≤N there. Hence det BN has one simple zero at cm+1 and no other zero in (cm,+∞). It is positive for large c, so it is negative on (cm,cm+1).

13.1F1givenalgebrastep 12.1

A positive invariant Hermitian form on the simple vacuum quotient pulls back, after normalizing the vacuum norm to1, to the canonical vacuum Gram form, because adjointness determines each PBW pairing. Every BN would therefore be positive semidefinite. The preceding negative determinant excludes every open interval (cm,cm+1). Negative c is already excluded by ∣∣L−21∣∣2=c/2. Since cm increases from0 to1, the only allowed c in [0,1) are the cm. This proves precisely the necessary vacuum restriction used below, without an unproved FQS curve argument.

14.1givengivenalgebrastep 13.1

Construct the algebraic NS Fock space on two complex fermion species pra,qra, a=1,2, r∈Z+1/2, with {pra,qsb}=δabδr+s,0, the other anticommutators zero, and all positive modes killing a vacuum of norm1. Fix the order of negative generators by increasing positive frequency, then by species and by p before q. Ordered negative-mode exterior monomials are an orthonormal basis, with (pra)†=q−ra, (qra)†=p−ra. This defines a positive Hermitian space directly. Give each negative generator p−ra,q−ra, r>0, degree r, the vacuum degree0, and each exterior monomial the sum of its generator degrees. This is a grading by nonnegative half-integers. Each degree E has finitely many monomials, because only the four generators at each positive half-integer frequency r≤E can occur and each occurs at most once. CAR makes every mode pra,qra homogeneous of degree−r: negative modes create, and positive modes contract the paired negative generator. Consequently each normally ordered summand of Jnab below has degree−n; so does its locally finite sum. In particular Jnab kills degree E whenever n>E. Define Jnab=∑r:praqn−rb:, with creators left and the fermionic sign on interchange. Each sum is locally finite on a finite exterior monomial. Direct CAR commutation gives [Jnab,psc]=δbcpn+sa and [Jnab,qsc]=−δacqn+sb. Therefore the current-current commutator differs from δ_bc Jm+nad−δadJm+ncb by an operator commuting with all fermions, hence a scalar. The joint kernel of the positive modes is exactly the vacuum line: the annihilator paired with a negative generator contracts it from each ordered exterior word containing it, with sign ±1; distinct words containing that generator give distinct shortened words. Thus annihilation forces every coefficient of a word containing that generator to vanish, and applying this to every generator leaves only the empty word. A commuting operator sends the vacuum into this joint kernel, so its value there is scalar; commuting with all creators fixes that same scalar on the entire exterior basis. Energy forces that scalar to vanish unless m+n=0. For m>0 its vacuum matrix coefficient counts the m half-integers between−m and0 in the two creating modes, giving mδ_adδ_bc. Antisymmetry gives all other m. Hence [Jmab,Jncd]=δbcJm+nad−δadJm+ncb+mδadδbcδm+n,0, (Jnab)†=J−nba.

15.1F5givenalgebrastep 14.1

Take E=J12, F=J21, H=J11−J22. These are restricted sl2 currents at level1, with normalized form B(E,F)=1,B(H,H)=2 and adjoints En†=F−n, Hn†=H−n. Every nonnegative current mode kills the vacuum. Tensor l+1 copies of this explicitly positive Fock representation. The sum of currents in the first l factors has level l; the last factor has level1; their diagonal has level l+1. The affine brackets follow by adding independent-factor brackets. All current actions are restricted and homogeneous for the finite-piece fermion energy grading.

16.1F5givenalgebrastep 15.1

Apply the published Sugawara current-action and Virasoro theorems to these three actions. For sl2 the adjoint Casimir for B is4, so h∨=2; this follows immediately from the basis E,F,H and their three brackets. Their stress tensors have central charges 3l/(l+2), 1 and 3(l+1)/(l+3). The Sugawara modes are Hermitian in the stated adjoint convention: the quadratic Casimir sum is H H/2+EF+FE, which is fixed by adjoint and index reversal; reindexing the finite-on-vectors normal-order sums gives Ln†=L−n. Put Cn=Ln(l)+Ln(1)−Lndiag(l+1). The published current-action formula gives [Cm,Jndiag]=0. Since the denominator Sugawara modes are locally finite quadratic expressions in those currents, Cm commutes with every denominator Sugawara mode as well. Subtracting the two Virasoro brackets therefore proves that Cn is Virasoro with charge 3l/(l+2)+1−3(l+1)/(l+3)=1−6/[(l+2)(l+3)].

17.1F1F3F5givenalgebrastep 16.1

No branching or integrable-module classification is used. These Cn inherit Cn†=C−n on the same positive Fock space. The vacuum is killed by Cn for n≥−1: each Sugawara term has this property because every nonnegative current kills the vacuum and two strictly negative integer indices cannot sum to−1 or a larger integer. Let S be the cyclic Virasoro module on that vacuum under Cn. It has finite-dimensional nonnegative integer graded pieces: every Cn has fermion energy degree−n, and C0 acts by grade on its cyclic span, since C0 kills the vacuum and [C0,C−n]=nC−n. Thus a word of total index N has both fermion degree N and C0 eigenvalue N, including the empty word at N=0. Thus its inherited positive form is an actual vacuum invariant Hermitian form. It is simple. Indeed any proper submodule is graded by interpolation in C0, has zero vacuum grade, and has a grade-by-grade orthogonal complement stable under every Cn by the adjoint relation. That complement contains the vacuum and hence all its cyclic span S, so the submodule is zero. The universal vacuum construction therefore identifies S with L(c,0) at c=1−6/[(l+2)(l+3)]. Taking l=m−2 gives every cm for m≥3. For m=2 use the one-dimensional trivial Virasoro representation at c=0, whose vacuum norm is positive. This proves sufficiency for every cm, including the degenerate minimal model.

18.1F1givenalgebrastep 17.1∎

For coprime p,q≥2 set d=∣p−q∣ and c=cp,q. If c<0 there is no positive form by the L−2 norm. If c=0, pq=6d² and gcd(d,pq)=1 force d=1. If 0<c<1, the necessary restriction gives c=cm, so pq=d²m(m+1). Again gcd(d,pq)=1 forces d=1. Conversely d=1 means {p,q}={m,m+1} for some m≥2, and the explicit construction above supplies the positive form. Thus the original vacuum unitarity clause holds exactly for |p−q|=1, independently of the still-separate general minimal-model Zhu polynomial/classification/cofiniteness proof.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources