Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Transformation between adapted charts and its kinematic consequences

Statement

Let (V,τ,g,A) be as in Affine time space with Euclidean simultaneous slices and adapted charts and let (o,u,(e1,e2,e3)) and (o′,u′,(e1′,e2′,e3′)) be two adapted charts, with coordinate functions (t,x) and (t′,x′) of Existence and uniqueness of adapted coordinates, and the affine structure of simultaneous slices.

  1. There are b∈R, a,v∈R3 and a matrix R∈O(3) such that for every p∈A

t′(p)=t(p)+b,x′(p)=R x(p)+v t(p)+a.

If (e1,e2,e3) and (e1′,e2′,e3′) are both positively oriented for the fixed orientation of K, then R∈SO(3) (The orthogonal group O(3) and the rotation group SO(3)).

  1. Let I⊆R be a nondegenerate interval and let γ:I→A be a map whose first-chart time coordinate satisfies t(γ(s))=s for all s∈I. Write x(s):=x(γ(s)) and y(s):=x′(γ(s)). The regularity hypothesis below means that this coordinate function x:I→R3 is continuously differentiable (respectively, twice continuously differentiable); no additional smooth structure on A is assumed. If x is continuously differentiable then y is continuously differentiable with

y′(s)=R x′(s)+v(s∈I),

and if x is twice continuously differentiable then y′′(s)=R x′′(s) for all s∈I. Equivalently, in the differentiated variables of the two charts, dx′/dt′=R dx/dt+v and d2x′/dt′2=R d2x/dt2.

  1. Consequently x′′=0 on I if and only if y′′=0 on I: the two charts agree on which time-parametrized curves have zero coordinate acceleration.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Two adapted charts (o,u,(e1,e2,e3)) and (o′,u′,(e1′,e2′,e3′)) of the data (V,τ,g,A), with coordinate functions (t,x) and (t′,x′); for clauses 2 and 3 a map γ:I→A with t(γ(s))=s, and its first-chart spatial coordinate x(s) of the stated regularity.

[L1]

Affine displacement identities: p+(q−p)=q, (q−p)+(r−q)=r−p, and displacements are additive over the action, as recorded in Affine time space with Euclidean simultaneous slices and adapted charts.

[L2]

τ is linear with τ(u)=τ(u′)=1 and K=ker⁡τ; hence τ(u−u′)=0, so u−u′∈K; moreover τ(o−o′)=t′(o)−t(o) is a constant (Affine time space with Euclidean simultaneous slices and adapted charts).

[L3]

Adapted coordinates are unique, and for each slice At the coordinate vector of p−o−tu∈K in the basis (e1,e2,e3) is x(p); likewise for the primed chart (Existence and uniqueness of adapted coordinates, and the affine structure of simultaneous slices).

[L4]

Both ordered bases are g-orthonormal and positively oriented; if M is the change-of-basis matrix defined by ej=∑kMkjek′, then MTM=I3, and det⁡M>0 because the two bases lie in the same orientation class. Determinant multiplicativity and invariance under transpose give (det⁡M)2=det⁡(MTM)=1; positivity and uniqueness of the positive square root give det⁡M=1. Hence M∈O(3), and M∈SO(3) under the orientation hypothesis of clause 1 (Orientation of a finite-dimensional real vector space, Orthogonal vectors and subspaces, orthogonal and orthonormal sets, and orthonormal bases, The orthogonal group O(3) and the rotation group SO(3), For every square matrix over a commutative ring, det⁡(AT)=det⁡(A), For same-sized finite square matrices over a commutative ring, det⁡(AB)=det⁡(A)det⁡(B), Square roots exist: a unique a≥0 with (a)2=a; the positives are {x2:x≠0}).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L1L2L3algebra

By the slice formula of [L3] applied at p and at o, t′(p)−t(p)=τ(p−o′)−τ(p−o)=τ(o−o′), which does not depend on p; put b:=τ(o−o′). This proves the first display of clause 1.

2.1step 1.1L1L2L3algebra

Let k:=p−o−tu=∑ixi(p)ei∈K and k′:=p−o′−t′u′=∑ixi′(p)ei′∈K. Subtracting the second expansion from the first and using [L1], k′=k+(o−o′)+(t−t′)u+t′(u−u′). Here (o−o′)+(t−t′)u∈K because its τ-value is b−b=0 by step 1.1 and [L2], and t′(u−u′)∈K by [L2]; hence the displayed equality is an identity in K.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1L1L3L4algebra

Let c∈R3 be the coordinate vector in the unprimed basis of the constant vector (o−o′)+(t−t′)u∈K, and let d∈R3 be the coordinate vector of u−u′∈K; by step 2.1 and [L3], the coordinate vector of k′ in the unprimed basis is x(p)+c+t′(p)d. Since the coordinate vector of k′ in the primed basis is x′(p) and changes of coordinates are given by [L4], x′(p)=M(x(p)+c+t′(p)d)=Mx(p)+(Md)t′(p)+Mc. Using t′=t+b from step 1.1 and setting R:=M, v:=Md, a:=Mc+bv, this reads x′(p)=Rx(p)+vt(p)+a, the second display of clause 1.

4.1step 3.1L4algebra

By [L4], MTM=I3, so R=M∈O(3); and if both bases are positively oriented then det⁡M>0, which with det⁡M=±1 gives det⁡M=1 and R∈SO(3). This completes clause 1.

4.2step 3.1L5algebra

For the map γ with t(γ(s))=s, clause 1 gives y(s)=x′(γ(s))=Rx(s)+vs+a. By [L5], this coordinate function is C1 with y′(s)=Rx′(s)+v, and if x is C2 it satisfies y′′(s)=Rx′′(s). Since t′(γ(s))=s+b, one has dt′/ds=1, giving the equivalent differentiated-coordinate formulas. This proves clause 2.

5.1step 4.2L4algebra∎

If x′′=0 on the interval then y′′=Rx′′=0 by step 4.2; conversely if y′′=0 then 0=RTy′′=RTRx′′=x′′ because RTR=I3 by [L4]. This proves clause 3.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources