Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-11-05 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Geometric parity consequences of an O3/O7 involution

Statement

Let X be a compact smooth complex threefold without boundary, with complex structure I, a Kähler metric g (a positive Riemannian metric satisfying g(Iu,Iv)=g(u,v) whose fundamental two-form J(u,v)=g(Iu,v) is closed), and a nowhere-zero holomorphic three-form Ω. Give X its complex orientation and interpret integrals as the choice-free finite-chart compact-support integrals (every smooth form on compact X has compact support). Let σ:X→X be a holomorphic isometry with σ2=id⁡, σ∗J=J, and σ∗Ω=−Ω. Write Ap,q(X)=Γ∞(X,ΛpT∗1,0X⊗ΛqT∗0,1X) for smooth complex-valued forms of bidegree (p,q), and let ∂ˉ be the Dolbeault differential. Define Hp,q(X)=ker⁡(∂ˉ:Ap,q(X)→Ap,q+1(X))/im⁡(∂ˉ:Ap,q−1(X)→Ap,q(X)), with Ap,−1(X)=0. Let dg∗ be the formal adjoint of the exterior derivative d for the L2 inner product induced by g and the complex orientation, and put Δg=ddg∗+dg∗d on smooth complex-valued forms. Define Hgp,q(X)={η∈Ap,q(X):Δgη=0}. The pullback action of σ on Hp,q(X) is the one induced by its action on Dolbeault classes. Then:

  1. Both Hp,q(X) and Hgp,q split as the direct sum of the +1 and −1 eigenspaces of σ∗.
  2. For smooth real two-forms ωα,ωa∈Γ∞(X,Λ2T∗X) satisfying σ∗ωα=ωα and σ∗ωa=−ωa, use Greek indices for the even forms and lowercase Latin indices for the odd forms, and set κABC=∫XωA∧ωB∧ωC. This integral vanishes whenever an odd number of A,B,C are odd; for closed forms this defines the real triple intersection pairing on HdR2(X;R):=ker⁡(d:A2(X;R)→A3(X;R))/dA1(X;R) by ([u],[v],[w])↦∫Xu∧v∧w, independently of representatives. Here Ar(X;R) denotes smooth real r-forms; no integral normalization or integrality is asserted.
  3. With Fix⁡(σ):={x∈X:σ(x)=x}, every connected component of Fix⁡(σ) has complex dimension 0 or 2.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The compact complex threefold, Kähler metric, complex orientation, nowhere-zero holomorphic three-form, and holomorphic isometric involution with the pullback conditions in the Statement.

[A1]

The pullback of forms and cohomology by σ is the ordinary functorial pullback; σ2=id⁡ is assumed in the Given clause.

[F1]

The holomorphic inverse function theorem in several complex variables gives a biholomorphic local coordinate map for a holomorphic map between open subsets of Cm whose complex Jacobian is invertible at the chosen point.

[F2]

Finite chart localization of compactly supported top forms, including boundary supplies, in ZF, a finite smooth chart localization equal to one near any compact set, an intrinsic linear integral of compactly supported top forms, and its invariance under orientation-preserving diffeomorphisms. Its nonnegative integral is strictly positive on a nonzero nonnegative top form.

[F3]

Compact-support Stokes on Euclidean space states that ∫Rndη=0 for every smooth compactly supported (n−1)-form, n≥1.

Proof

Given: The data and pullback conditions in the Statement.

1.1givenA1F2algebra

At each point, the real determinant of a holomorphic differential is ∣det⁡CDσ∣2>0. Therefore σ preserves the complex orientation, and the choice-free change-of-variables clause of [F2] gives ∫Xσ∗η=∫Xη for every smooth top-degree form η.

1.2givenA1algebra

Fix p∈Fix⁡(σ) and set A=Dσp. Holomorphicity makes A complex-linear and σ2=id⁡ gives A2=I, so A is diagonalizable with eigenvalues +1 and −1. The pullback condition on the nonzero three-form gives det⁡CA=−1; therefore the number m of −1 eigenvalues is odd and, in complex dimension three, is either 1 or 3. The +1 eigenspace has complex dimension 2 or 0.

1.3givenF2F3algebra

For any smooth real five-form θ, take the finite chart localization (χi) of [F2] on compact X. Then dθ=∑id(χiθ) since ∑iχi=1. In each boundaryless chart, the coordinate form χiθ extends smoothly by zero to a compactly supported five-form on R6; [F3] makes its derivative integral zero. Locality and linearity in [F2] give ∫Xdθ=0. For closed two-forms u,v,w, replacing u by u+dλ changes the triple integral by ∫Xd(λ∧v∧w)=0. Applying this successively in each argument proves representative independence and trilinearity of the stated real pairing. Only a finite family of charts is used, so no choice axiom is added.

2.1givenA1step 1.1algebra

Pullback is an involution on each Hp,q(X) because σ2=id⁡, and holomorphicity preserves bidegree. For any vector u in such a cohomology space, u+=(u+σ∗u)/2 and u−=(u−σ∗u)/2 satisfy u=u++u− and σ∗u+=u+, σ∗u−=−u−. If a vector belongs to both eigenspaces then it equals its own negative, hence is zero. This proves the direct-sum decomposition on cohomology.

2.2givenstep 1.1algebra

For three eigenforms, σ∗(ωA∧ωB∧ωC)=ϵAϵBϵC ωA∧ωB∧ωC, where each ϵ is +1 for an even index and −1 for an odd index. By step 1.1 the integral is unchanged by pullback. If an odd number of indices are odd, then ϵAϵBϵC=−1, so κABC=−κABC and hence κABC=0.

3.1givenF2step 1.1step 2.1algebra

Put T=σ∗ and write (u,v)=∫X⟨u,v⟩gvol⁡g for the Hermitian L2 product, linear in its first argument. The isometry and step 1.1 give (Tu,Tv)=(u,v); also T2=1 and Td=dT. For smooth forms u,v of adjacent degrees, (du,Tv)=(Tdu,v)=(dTu,v)=(Tu,dg∗v)=(u,Tdg∗v). The defining identity of the formal adjoint also makes the left side (u,dg∗Tv). Thus (u,dg∗Tv−Tdg∗v)=0 for all u, so dg∗T=Tdg∗, by taking u to be that smooth difference and using positive definiteness of the integral from [F2]. Hence TΔg=ΔgT. Holomorphicity preserves bidegree and commutes with ∂ˉ (the (0,1) part of d); applying the two projections of step 2.1 to harmonic forms proves their direct-sum decomposition.

4.1givenF1step 1.2constructalgebra∎

In a holomorphic chart centered at p, write the local involution as s(z) with derivative A. Define w(z)=12(z+As(z)). Then Dw(0)=12(I+A2)=I. The map w is holomorphic on an open neighborhood in C3, so [F1] gives a biholomorphic local coordinate map. Shrink the original chart to its intersection with its image under s so that both z and s(z) remain in the coordinate domain. Then w(s(z))=12(s(z)+Az)=Aw(z). Hence the fixed set in this chart is exactly the +1 eigenspace of A, a complex submanifold of the dimension found in step 1.2. Every fixed point has such a chart, so each fixed component has complex dimension 0 or 2.

Remarks

The vanishing intersection statement is purely mathematical. In the Type IIB application, complex fixed components of dimensions 0 and 2 give the internal loci of space-filling O3- and O7-planes, respectively; source charges and tadpole conditions are separate physical data.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources