How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Engineering scaling of the Gaussian gradient and quartic actions
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice , meaning every sequence of nonempty sets has a function with for every . Let integer , dimensionless scale factor , and real function be given, where denotes the functions whose partial derivatives of every order exist and are continuous and whose support is compact. Define
For any , define its Gaussian gradient action and quartic integral by
where is the vector of first partial derivatives. Then
Consequently a coefficient multiplying transforms to when the action is re-expressed in the rescaled coordinate . This is engineering power counting on smooth test fields; it neither constructs an interacting probability measure nor proves an interacting critical exponent.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , integer , , and a real smooth compactly supported on .
Under , a diffeomorphism changes a nonnegative Lebesgue integral by its absolute Jacobian (The Axiom of Countable Choice (), A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for nonnegative Lebesgue measurable functions).
The derivative of a composition is given by the chain rule (The chain rule, in one line from Carathéodory: if is differentiable at and is differentiable at , then is differentiable at with ).
Proof
The map is a diffeomorphism of with Jacobian determinant . By [F2], each partial derivative satisfies Thus . Applying [F1] with to this nonnegative integrand gives The compact support and smoothness assumptions make these integrands measurable and finite.
The same change of variables gives Therefore with , as claimed.