Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Antisymmetric contractions vanish and mU′=qΦ(U) preserves η(U,U)

Statement

Let (V,η) be the four-dimensional real Minkowski vector space of The Minkowski affine four-space: the form η, causal cones, frames and Lorentz maps, with the fixed form of signature (−1,1,1,1). Let F:V×V→R be a skew-symmetric bilinear form, F(u,v)=−F(v,u) for all u,v∈V (Bilinear forms, and symmetric, skew-symmetric, and alternating bilinear forms). Since η is nondegenerate, for each u∈V there is exactly one Φ(u)∈V with η(Φ(u),w)=F(w,u) for all w∈V (Bilinear forms on V correspond linearly and bijectively to linear maps V→V∗, The matrix, left and right radicals, rank, and nondegeneracy of a bilinear form on a finite-dimensional space), and Φ:V→V is linear (Linear map between vector spaces over the same field); with Fαβ:=F(eα,eβ) in the fixed ordered basis (e0,e1,e2,e3) of The Minkowski affine four-space: the form η, causal cones, frames and Lorentz maps and (ημα) the inverse matrix of (ηαβ), one has Φ(u)μ=∑α,βημαFαβuβ, the index-raised form of F. Then η(u,Φ(u))=0 for every u∈V; in components uμFμνuν=0, where uμ:=∑αημαuα and Fμν:=∑αημαFαν. Consequently, if J⊆R is a nonempty open interval (Intervals of R: the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length), U:J→V is differentiable (The derivative and the Riemann integral of a vector-valued function: an intrinsic derivative and a componentwise integral), and m U′(s)=q Φ(U(s)) on J for some real m≠0 and q, then s↦η(U(s),U(s)) is constant on J (Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: (f+g)′(c)=f′(c)+g′(c), (αf)′(c)=αf′(c), (fg)′(c)=f′(c)g(c)+f(c)g′(c), and (f/g)′(c)=(f′(c)g(c)−f(c)g′(c))/g(c)2 when g(c)≠0, A function differentiable at c is continuous at c, A function continuous on an interval I whose derivative vanishes at every interior point of I is constant on I; consequently two such functions with the same derivative differ by a constant). The same norm-conservation conclusion holds for a family of skew forms Fs and their pointwise operators Φs defined by η(Φs(u),w)=Fs(w,u), when mU′(s)=qΦs(U(s)): no derivative of Fs is required. In particular one may evaluate a varying field Fx along a differentiable trajectory x(s). This is a conditional statement about the given equation; it does not assert that this equation governs any particle.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The four-dimensional Minkowski vector space (V,η) of The Minkowski affine four-space: the form η, causal cones, frames and Lorentz maps with fixed ordered basis (e0,e1,e2,e3), a skew-symmetric bilinear form F:V×V→R, a nonempty open interval J⊆R, a differentiable curve U:J→V, and real numbers m≠0 and q.

[L1]

η is symmetric and bilinear with matrix ηαβ=η(eα,eβ)=diag⁡(−1,1,1,1) in the basis (e0,e1,e2,e3), that matrix is its own inverse, and η is nondegenerate (The Minkowski affine four-space: the form η, causal cones, frames and Lorentz maps).

[L2]

A bilinear form F is skew-symmetric when F(u,v)=−F(v,u) for all u,v, and over the real field this implies F(u,u)=0 for every u: setting v=u gives 2F(u,u)=0 and division by the nonzero real scalar 2 gives zero (Bilinear forms, and symmetric, skew-symmetric, and alternating bilinear forms, The Minkowski affine four-space: the form η, causal cones, frames and Lorentz maps).

[L3]

A bilinear form B on a finite-dimensional space is nondegenerate exactly when its flat map B♭:V→V∗, B♭(u)(v)=B(u,v), is an isomorphism (The matrix, left and right radicals, rank, and nondegeneracy of a bilinear form on a finite-dimensional space).

[L4]

The assignment B↦B♭ is a linear bijection from bilinear forms on V to linear maps V→V∗ (Bilinear forms on V correspond linearly and bijectively to linear maps V→V∗).

[L5]

A map T:V→V is linear when T(av+bw)=aT(v)+bT(w) (Linear map between vector spaces over the same field).

[L6]

A curve U into R4 is differentiable exactly when all its components are, and then (U′)a=(Ua)′ (The derivative and the Riemann integral of a vector-valued function: an intrinsic derivative and a componentwise integral).

[L8]

Differentiability at a limit point of the domain implies continuity there (A function differentiable at c is continuous at c).

[L10]

A nonempty open interval is order-convex, and every point of it is interior to it and is a limit point of it (Intervals of R: the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenL2algebra

For each u∈V the map w↦F(w,u) is linear: by bilinearity of F [L2] one has F(aw+a′w′,u)=aF(w,u)+a′F(w′,u) for all reals a,a′ and all w,w′∈V, so F(⋅,u)∈V∗.

1.2givenL1L3L4

The flat map η♭:V→V∗, η♭(x)(w):=η(x,w), is a bijection: η is nondegenerate on the four-dimensional space V, so by [L3] its flat map is an isomorphism; equivalently, no nonzero x satisfies η(x,w)=0 for all w.

2.1step 1.1step 1.2L3L4

For each u∈V there is exactly one Φ(u)∈V with η(Φ(u),w)=F(w,u) for all w∈V, namely Φ(u):=(η♭)−1(F(⋅,u)): the functional F(⋅,u) lies in V∗ by step 1.1 and η♭ is a bijection by step 1.2, so exactly one x∈V satisfies η♭(x)=F(⋅,u), that is η(x,w)=F(w,u) for all w.

3.1step 2.1L1L2L5

Φ:V→V is linear: for all u,u′∈V, all reals a,a′ and every w∈V, bilinearity of F and η [L1, L2] gives η(Φ(au+a′u′),w)=F(w,au+a′u′)=aF(w,u)+a′F(w,u′)=aη(Φ(u),w)+a′η(Φ(u′),w)=η(aΦ(u)+a′Φ(u′),w); since w is arbitrary, the uniqueness in step 2.1 gives Φ(au+a′u′)=aΦ(u)+a′Φ(u′), which is linearity in the sense of [L5].

3.2step 2.1L1algebra

Coordinate formula: writing Fαβ:=F(eα,eβ) and letting ηνα denote the entry of the inverse of the matrix (ηαβ)=diag⁡(−1,1,1,1), one has Φ(u)ν=ηναFαβuβ, the sum running over α,β∈{0,1,2,3}: substituting this candidate into the defining pairing gives ημνηναFαβuβ=δμαFαβuβ=Fμβuβ=F(eμ,u), because ημνηνα=δμα is the inverse-matrix identity and the matrix diag⁡(−1,1,1,1) is its own inverse [L1]; the candidate therefore satisfies the defining property in step 2.1, and uniqueness gives the formula, that is Φ(u)0=−F0βuβ and Φ(u)i=Fiβuβ for i=1,2,3.

3.3step 2.1L1L2algebra

η(u,Φ(u))=0 for every u∈V: symmetry of η [L1] and the defining equation of step 2.1 give η(u,Φ(u))=η(Φ(u),u)=F(u,u), which is 0 by the skew-symmetry of F [L2].

4.1step 3.2step 3.3L1L2algebra

Component form: uμFμνuν=0, where uμ:=ημαuα and Fμν:=ημαFαν; indeed uμFμνuν=uαηαμημβFβνuν=uβFβνuν=F(u,u)=0 by [L2], the middle equality using the inverse-matrix identity of step 3.2 and the last equally following from step 3.3 with the coordinate formula, since uβFβνuν=η(u,Φ(u)).

4.2step 3.3L1L6L7L8L9L10algebra

Norm conservation for a constant form: assume m U′(s)=q Φ(U(s)) on J with m≠0; then f(s):=η(U(s),U(s)) is constant on J. Indeed, by [L1] and [L6], f(s)=∑a=03ϵa(Ua(s))2 with ϵ=(−1,1,1,1) is differentiable on J with f′(s)=∑a2ϵaUa(s)(Ua)′(s)=2η(U(s),U′(s)), using the product rule and sum rule [L7]; the equation gives η(U(s),U′(s))=(q/m)η(U(s),Φ(U(s)))=0 by step 3.3, so f′=0 everywhere on J; f is continuous on J by [L8] and the interval J is order-convex with every point interior [L10], so [L9] gives that f is constant on J.

5.1step 4.2L2L6L7L9algebra

Varying-form clause: let Fs, s∈J, be skew-symmetric bilinear forms and let Φs be defined pointwise by η(Φs(u),w)=Fs(w,u), with mU′(s)=qΦs(U(s)) on J; then s↦η(U(s),U(s)) is again constant on J. Indeed the computation of step 4.2 applies verbatim — it differentiates only U, never Φs or Fs — giving f′(s)=2η(U(s),U′(s)), while at each fixed s one has η(U(s),Φs(U(s)))=Fs(U(s),U(s))=0 by the skew-symmetry of Fs [L2]; hence η(U,U′)=(q/m)η(U,Φs(U))=0 and f′=0 on J, so [L9] gives that f is constant as in step 4.2. In particular, for a varying field Fx and a differentiable trajectory x(s) one may take Fs:=Fx(s) and the corresponding pointwise operator Φs.

6.1step 2.1step 3.1step 3.2step 3.3step 4.1step 4.2step 5.1∎

Conclusion: for every u∈V there is exactly one Φ(u) with η(Φ(u),w)=F(w,u) for all w (step 2.1); Φ is linear (step 3.1) and has the index-raised coordinate formula Φ(u)μ=ημαFαβuβ (step 3.2); η(u,Φ(u))=0 (step 3.3), in components uμFμνuν=0 (step 4.1); and both mU′=qΦ(U) and its varying-form version mU′=qΦs(U) make s↦η(U(s),U(s)) constant on the nonempty open interval J (steps 4.2 and 5.1). The statement is conditional on the displayed equation and asserts nothing about particles.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources