Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pendingjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Compact charged-scalar action variations at classical finite regularity

Statement

Use the classical finite-regularity configuration, relative actions and compact smooth directions of Classical finite-regularity charged-scalar system and relative action. In particular the underlying manifold is smooth, g∈C3, A,φ∈C2, F=dA, P=Dφ, and the constants and potential have exactly that Definition's hypotheses. Then all compact first variations exist, and

δS=c316πGNIM ⁣([Gab+Λgab−κE(TabEM+Tabφ)]qabvolg)+1μ0cIM ⁣((∇aFab+μ0jb)αbvolg)+KφcRe⁡IM ⁣(η‾Eφvolg).

The scalar and free Maxwell summands separately have first variations

δSφ=−12cIM(Tabφqabvolg)+1cIM(jaαavolg)+KφcRe⁡IM(η‾Eφvolg),

δSEM=−12cIM(TabEMqabvolg)+1μ0cIM((∇aFab)αbvolg).

Thus compact stationarity is equivalent to all the pointwise classical charged-scalar equations in that Definition. The homogeneous equation dF=0 holds identically in the global-potential domain.

Without assuming the Einstein, Maxwell or scalar field equations, one also has the classical identities

∇aja=KφλIm⁡(φ‾Eφ),∇a(Tφ)ab=KφRe⁡(Eφ‾Pb)+Fbaja,

∇a(TEM)ab=μ0−1Fba∇cFca.

Consequently the scalar equation implies current conservation, and the scalar and sourced Maxwell equations together imply ∇a(TEM+Tφ)ab=0 before any Einstein equation is used. These conclusions are valid for the stated classical fields with continuous coefficients; they claim no lower roughness threshold, smoothing, physical adoption or coupled-solution existence.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The fields, compact smooth directions and relative action of the Definition in [F1].

[F1]

Classical finite-regularity charged-scalar system and relative action fixes g∈C3, A,φ∈C2, all tensors, the continuous compact top-form integral, the positive constants, arbitrary real λ, the open potential domain, and actual compact variations staying in that domain.

[F2]

Finite chart localization gives choice-free integration and compact Stokes supplies finitely many smooth chart cutoffs summing to one near a given compact set. Its smooth Stokes conclusion is not being applied to a merely C1 field; the necessary classical integration by parts is proved below.

[F3]

Every continuous function on a closed nondegenerate rectangle in Rm is Riemann integrable makes every continuous coefficient and every continuous partial derivative integrable on a bounding rectangle.

[F4]

Riemann--Fubini on product rectangles, with lower and upper section integrals and content-zero exceptional sections identifies an ordinary iterated integral with the multiple integral when every section in that order is integrable; the continuous coefficients here satisfy that condition.

[F5]

The second fundamental theorem: if G is differentiable on [a,b] with G′=f and f is integrable, then ∫abf=G(b)−G(a) gives ∫abH′=H(b)−H(a) on a nondegenerate closed interval when H is differentiable there and H′ is integrable, including its endpoint derivatives.

[F6]

Linearity, monotonicity, the absolute-value estimate and coordinate-slice additivity for the Riemann integral in Rm gives finite linearity, monotonicity and ∣∫f∣≤∫∣f∣ for Riemann-integrable functions on a nondegenerate rectangle. The Darboux sums of a constant equal that constant times the rectangle volume.

Proof

technique · justify classical compact integration, compute the three variations in coordinates, separate their continuous coefficients, and differentiate the explicit current and stresses
1.1givenF1F2F3F5F6algebra

Fix the compact support K of the directions. Use [F2]'s finite smooth localization near K, independently of the variation parameter. In each chart the localized density difference and its parameter derivative are continuous on a fixed compact parameter-rectangle product: every density is a smooth algebraic expression in the nondegenerate metric, its derivatives through order two, and the matter fields through order one. The families in [F1] have the required joint derivatives. The one-variable fundamental theorem gives the difference quotient as the average of those parameter derivatives along the parameter segment. Uniform continuity on this compact product makes that quotient converge uniformly to the derivative at zero. Monotonicity and the absolute-value estimate [F6], compared with the constant sup⁡Q∣f∣, give ∣∫Qf∣≤vol⁡(Q)sup⁡Q∣f∣; this passes the limit through each finite Riemann integral. Thus the relative actions can be differentiated by differentiating their densities, even when the background global actions diverge.

1.2givenF1F2F3F4F5algebra

Let W be any compactly supported C1 vector field. Write w=∣det⁡g∣. The Christoffel formula and determinant derivative give Γaab=∂blog⁡w, hence ∇aWavolg=∂a(wWa)d4x in a positive chart. For each finite cutoff χi in [F2], wχiWa extends by zero to a C1 compactly supported coefficient on a bounding rectangle. Its partial derivatives and all sections are continuous, so [F3]–[F5] integrate its coordinate divergence to zero: the opposite-face values vanish. Summing over i gives the same result for W, because ∑iχi=1 and ∑idχi=0 near its support. Therefore IM((∇aWa)volg)=0 for this C1 field. No smoothness approximation or unproved rough Stokes assertion is used.

2.1givenF1step 1.1step 1.2algebra

Put hab=δgab=−gacgbdqcd. Differentiation of gacgcb=δba and of the determinant gives δw=−12wgabqab. Differentiating the coordinate formula for the Christoffel symbols and collecting the terms containing h gives δΓabc=12gad(∇bhcd+∇chbd−∇dhbc). To differentiate Ricci, use Rab=∂cΓcab−∂bΓcac+ΓccdΓdab−ΓcbdΓdac. The differentiated quadratic terms are exactly the connection terms that complete the two derivatives to δRab=∇cδΓcab−∇bδΓcac. Metric compatibility in this coordinate connection then gives δ((R−2Λ)w)=w(Gab+Λgab)qab+∂a(wVa),Va=gbcδΓabc−gabδΓcbc. All expressions exist classically: g,h are C3, δΓ is C2, and V is a compactly supported C2 vector field. Steps 1.1–1.2 therefore yield the Einstein–Hilbert first variation c3(16πGN)−1IM((G+Λg)abqabvolg).

3.1givenF1step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1algebra

At fixed metric, δFab=∂aαb−∂bαa=2∇[aαb]; torsion-freeness follows directly from symmetry of the Christoffel formula. Thus δ(FabFab)=4Fab∇aαb. The C1 compact vector Wa=Fabαb satisfies ∇aWa=(∇aFab)αb+Fab∇aαb. Steps 1.1–1.2 give δASEM=(μ0c)−1IM((∇aFab)αbvolg). At fixed lower F, direct inverse-metric differentiation gives δ(FcdFcd)=2FacFbcqab. Combining it with δw from step 2.1 gives δgSEM=−(2c)−1IM(TabEMqabvolg). This uses only F∈C1 and the declared metric class.

3.2givenF1step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1algebra

For η=δφ, direct differentiation gives δφLφ=2Re⁡(Daη‾Pa+V′η‾φ). The product rule is ∇a(η‾Pa)=Daη‾Pa+η‾DaPa: the opposite gauge signs cancel. Its real and imaginary parts are C1 compact vector fields. Integrating their divergence by step 1.2 yields δφSφ=(Kφ/c)Re⁡IM(η‾Eφvolg). At fixed g,φ, δAPa=−iλφαa, so δALφ=−2λIm⁡(φ‾Pa)αa, giving the claimed j. At fixed lower A and fixed φ, δgLφ=Re⁡(Pa‾Pb)qab; the volume term then gives the displayed Tφ. These calculations require no derivative beyond φ∈C2 and A∈C2.

4.1givenF1F3F6step 2.1step 3.1step 3.2constructalgebra

Add steps 2.1, 3.1 and 3.2. The equality (2c)−1=[c3/(16πGN)]κE gives exactly the total first variation in the Statement, with its three independent directions. Its coefficients are continuous; the metric coefficient is symmetric. To see that testing detects a nonzero continuous component, take a positive chart where that component has one strict sign. A nonnegative smooth bump supported inside that chart, positive on a smaller closed rectangle, has a strictly positive signed pairing with the component times w>0. Such a bump can be taken as e−1/(r2−∣x∣2) inside a coordinate ball and zero outside. The resulting integral is nonzero: on the smaller rectangle the continuous sign-adjusted coefficient has a positive lower bound a>0, so its integral is at least a times that rectangle volume by [F6]. Cutting a containing rectangle along the smaller rectangle faces and using coordinate-slice additivity in [F6] shows the full integral is at least that positive value, since the integrand is nonnegative on the remainder. A one-form test isolates any connection component; diagonal and symmetrized off-diagonal metric tests isolate every symmetric component. Scalar tests η=f and η=if isolate the real and imaginary parts of Eφ. Therefore stationarity for all these tests forces all three coefficients to vanish pointwise. Conversely their pointwise vanishing makes every first variation zero. The identity dF=0 in [F1] supplies the remaining homogeneous equation.

4.2givenF1step 3.2algebra

The charged product rule gives ∇aja=KφλIm⁡(Pa‾Pa+φ‾DaPa). The first contraction is real and V′ is real, giving the stated current identity. Differentiating Tφ and using ∂bLφ=2Re⁡(Pa‾DbPa)+2V′Re⁡(φ‾Pb) gives ∇a(Tφ)ab=KφRe⁡(Eφ‾Pb+Pa‾(DaPb−DbPa)). The symmetric Christoffel terms cancel in the difference. Expanding P=∂φ−iλAφ and commuting the continuous second scalar partial derivatives gives DaPb−DbPa=−iλFabφ. Its contribution to the real part is −KφλFabIm⁡(φ‾Pa)=Fbaja. This proves the two scalar off-shell identities using only first derivatives of P and C2 scalar partials.

5.1givenF1step 4.2algebra∎

Since F=dA with A∈C2, its homogeneous identity is ∇aFbc+∇bFca+∇cFab=0. Contraction with Fac gives 2Fac∇aFbc=12∂b(FcdFcd). The product rule in the explicit Maxwell tensor therefore yields ∇a(TEM)ab=μ0−1[(∇aFac)Fbc+Fac∇aFbc−14∂b(FcdFcd)]=μ0−1Fba∇cFca. These are continuous identities for F∈C1. If the sourced Maxwell equation holds, the last expression is −Fbaja, which cancels the scalar force term in step 4.2 when Eφ=0. This proves total-stress conservation and current conservation before any Einstein equation. No smooth-only stress or Noether theorem is invoked at the classical regularity.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources