Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Flat Dirichlet Holder estimate by normal-jet lifting and reflection

Statement

Assume Countable Choice and fix 0<α<1. Put BR+=BR(0)∩{x3>0} and TR=BR(0)∩{x3=0}. For any nonempty set A⊆R3 with at least two points and any scalar or finite-dimensional array-valued q on A, define [q]α;A:=sup⁡x,y∈A, x≠y∣q(x)−q(y)∣/∣x−y∣α, set [q]α;A:=0 when A has at most one point, and define ∥q∥∞;A:=sup⁡A∣q∣, using the Euclidean norm for arrays. For a function f on the closed half-ball, C0,α(BR+‾) consists of continuous functions there with finite seminorm and norm ∥f∥C0,α(BR+‾):=∥f∥∞;BR+‾+[f]α;BR+‾; in this statement [f]α and ∥f∥∞ denote [f]α;BR+‾ and ∥f∥∞;BR+‾. Suppose u is bounded and has continuous partial derivatives through order 2 in BR+ which extend continuously to every compact subset of BR∩{x3≥0}, Δu=f in BR+, u=0 on TR, and f∈C0,α(BR+‾). There is no condition on the curved boundary and no requirement that f∣TR=0. Then

∑j=02Rj∥Dju∥∞;BR/2++R2+α[D2u]α;BR/2+≤Cα(∥u∥∞;BR++R2∥f∥∞+R2+α[f]α).

The derivatives extend Hölder continuously to the flat face. The constant is independent of R and of any higher derivative of a smooth approximant.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The radius, exponent, half-ball, classical solution and forcing in the Statement.

[A1]

Countable Choice is assumed for the integration suppliers. The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)

[F1]

The local Newtonian cancellation proof supplies −ΔNG=G and the full scaled C2,α estimate for compactly supported globally Hölder data in three dimensions. Newtonian cancellation and the three-dimensional Holder bound

[F2]

Smooth nonnegative radial bumps, and hence normalized smooth mollifiers, exist in Euclidean balls. A smooth bump between concentric Euclidean balls

[F3]

The divergence theorem on balls gives the mean-value identity for classical harmonic functions, by differentiation of their sphere averages. Divergence on a bounded C1 Euclidean domain

Proof

1.1givenconstructalgebra

Scale first to R=1. Write x=(x′,t), t=x3. The boundary function g(x′)=f(x′,0) on the closed unit disk is bounded by M=∥f∥∞ and has seminorm at most H=[f]α. Extend it to all R2 by taking inf⁡z(g(z)+H∣x′−z∣α) over the original disk and clamping to [−M,M]. The inequality (a+b)α≤aα+bα shows that this infimum is H-Hölder; the original Hölder inequality and z=x′ show agreement on the disk. Clamping is one-Lipschitz and preserves this agreement. For H=0 take the constant extension. Thus no differentiability of the boundary forcing is assumed.

2.1givenF2step 1.1constructalgebra

Choose a two-dimensional mollifier ρ from [F2], set gt(x′)=∫ρ(z)g(x′−tz) dz for t>0, and put L(x′,t)=t2gt(x′)/2. A derivative of total order k≥1 in (x′,t) of the kernel t−2ρ((x′−y′)/t) has integral zero and has the form t−2−kP((x′−y′)/t), with P smooth and compactly supported. Subtract g(x′) under that differentiated integral to obtain ∣Dkgt∣≤CkHtα−k for k=1,2,3, and ∣gt−g∣≤CHtα. Differentiation is legitimate on every compact positive-t interval because the differentiated kernels are bounded and compactly supported there.

3.1step 2.1algebra

Set L=DL=0 on the face. For i,j<3, direct differentiation gives Lij=t2(gt)ij/2, Lit=t(gt)i+t2(gt)it/2 and Ltt=gt+2t(gt)t+t2(gt)tt/2. Consequently D2L(x′,t) differs by at most CHtα from the boundary matrix whose sole nonzero entry is its normal-normal entry g(x′), and ∣D3L∣≤CHtα−1. These are actual boundary jets: L/t2→g/2, Lt/t→g, and Li/t→0. For points X=(x′,t),Y=(y′,s) at distance d, if d<min⁡(t,s)/2, integrate the third-derivative bound along their segment to get CHdmin⁡(t,s)α−1≤CHdα. Otherwise min⁡(t,s)≤2d and max⁡(t,s)≤3d; compare both Hessians to their boundary jets and use the Hölder bound of g. Thus ∥L∥C2,α(R2×[0,1])≤Cα(M+H) and (ΔL)(x′,0)=g(x′).

4.1givenstep 3.1algebra

Let v=u−L and F=f−ΔL. Then v=0 and F=0 on the flat face, Δv=F, and ∥F∥C0,α+∥L∥C2,α≤Cα∥f∥C0,α. Because v is C2 up to the face and has zero face restriction, its tangential first and second derivatives vanish there. The continuous equation then gives vtt=0 there. Its odd reflection V(x′,−t)=−v(x′,t) is therefore C2 across the face: tangential-tangential and normal-normal Hessian entries are odd with zero trace, and mixed entries are even with matching traces. Its equation is ΔV=Fo, with Fo the odd reflection of F. For opposite-side points (x′,t),(y′,−s), the zero trace gives ∣Fo(x′,t)−Fo(y′,−s)∣≤[F]α(tα+sα)≤21−α[F]α∣(x′,t)−(y′,−s)∣α. Same-side pairs use the original bound. Hence Fo∈C0,α(B1) with controlled norm. The original forcing has not been reflected without first removing its possibly nonzero trace.

5.1A1F1F2step 4.1constructalgebra

Choose a fixed radial η equal to one on B3/4 and supported in B7/8, extend G=ηFo by zero, and put W=−NG. The Hölder product inequality and the support buffer give ∥G∥C0,α(R3)≤C∥Fo∥C0,α(B1): a point in B7/8 is at distance at least 1/8 from the exterior of B1. By [F1], ΔW=G and ∥W∥C2,α(B3/4)≤Cα∥f∥C0,α. The radial kernel and cutoff are even in the normal coordinate, so W is odd, and on the upper half-space it is exactly the reflected Green potential −∫y3>0(Φ(x−y)−Φ(x−y∗))η(y)F(y) dy, with y∗=(y′,−y3). This reflection uses the corrected zero-trace Hölder datum, not a discontinuous odd extension of f.

6.1F2F3step 3.1step 5.1algebra

The remainder H0=V−W is harmonic in B3/4 with ∥H0∥∞≤∥u∥∞+Cα∥f∥C0,α. By [F3], its sphere averages equal its center value. Average those identities against a fixed smooth radial kernel supported in B1/16. On B5/8 this writes H0=κ∗H0 using only values in B3/4; differentiation falls on κ, giving ∥DjH0∥∞;B1/2≤Cj∥H0∥∞ for j≤3. Integration along segments then bounds [D2H0]α;B1/2. Combining these bounds with u=L+W+H0 on the upper half-ball proves the unit-radius estimate, including its flat-face limits.

7.1step 1.1step 6.1algebra∎

For general R, apply the unit result to uR(x)=u(Rx) and fR(x)=R2f(Rx). Derivatives scale by Rj and the Hessian Hölder seminorm by R2+α. Thus the displayed estimate follows with the same constant. Only the given C2 boundary regularity was used to justify reflection; no bound on higher derivatives of u or f has entered.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources