Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pendingverified 2026-10-23 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Difference energy for given smooth incompressible and symmetric solutions

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. Let d∈{1,2,3}, T>0, and Qd=Rd/(2πZ)d with normalized measure dμ=(2π)−ddx. For z:Qd→RM, use componentwise Fourier coefficients z^(k)=∫Qdz(x)e−ik⋅x dμ(x), weights wk=(1+∣k∣2)1/2, and the weighted coefficient completion norm ∥z∥Hs2=∑k∈Zdwk2s∣z^(k)∣2; the normalized Fourier isometry gives ∥z∥22=∑k∣z^(k)∣2, where ∥z∥2=(∫Qd∣z∣2 dμ)1/2 and the pointwise component norm is Euclidean. In particular, H0=L2. For a map z:[0,T]×Qd→RM, smooth on the closed cylinder means that for every m∈N0 and spatial multi-index α, ∂tm∂xαz exists on (0,T)×Qd and extends continuously to [0,T]×Qd; spatial derivatives are those of its periodic lift. For a spatial vector field define div⁡z=∑j=1d∂jzj and Δz=∑j=1d∂j2z. Write ∇z for the spatial Jacobian and ∥∇z(t)∥∞=sup⁡x∈Qd∣∇z(t,x)∣F, where ∣⋅∣F is the Euclidean Frobenius matrix norm. Let P be the coefficientwise vector multiplier with P0=I and Pk=I−kkT/∣k∣2 for k≠0. The equations below hold pointwise on (0,T)×Qd and at the time endpoints by continuous extension.

(i) If ν≥0 and u,v∈C∞([0,T]×Qd;Rd) satisfy, for each z∈{u,v}, zt+P((z⋅∇)z)=νΔz,div⁡z=0, then for every t∈[0,T], with w=u−v, ∥w(t)∥22≤∥w(0)∥22exp⁡ ⁣(2∫0t∥∇v(τ)∥∞ dτ).

(ii) Let N≥1 and, for 1≤j≤d, let Aj:RN→RN×N be a fixed real-linear map whose image consists of symmetric matrices. If q,r∈C∞([0,T]×Qd;RN) satisfy, for each z∈{q,r}, zt+∑j=1dAj(z)∂jz=0, then for every t∈[0,T], ∥q(t)−r(t)∥22≤∥q(0)−r(0)∥22exp⁡ ⁣(Cd,N,A∫0t(∥∇q(τ)∥∞+∥∇r(τ)∥∞) dτ), where Cd,N,A depends only on d,N and the operator norms of the finitely many maps Aj. For either pair (z1,z2)=(u,v) or (q,r), put w=z1−z2. Let Γ≥0 be any uniform rate for which the corresponding squared L2 estimate above gives ∥w(t)∥22≤∥w(0)∥22eΓt. If s≥1 and max⁡t∈[0,T]max⁡(∥z1(t)∥Hs,∥z2(t)∥Hs)≤M for some M≥0, define Bs(M)={1,s=1,(2M)(s−1)/s,s>1. Then for every t∈[0,T], ∥w(t)∥Hs−1≤Bs(M)∥w(0)∥21/seΓt/(2s). These are conditional estimates for already given smooth maps on the stated cylinder and assert no existence theorem. All quantities are mathematical and no physical units are assigned to ν.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The hypotheses and conventions stated in the formulation.

[F1]

The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω): Countable Choice is the explicit periodic Fourier coefficient assumption.

[F2]

Periodic fluid Fourier Sobolev spaces: Hs is the weighted Fourier coefficient completion with wk=(1+∣k∣2)1/2; for s≥0 it has a unique L2 representative, and H0=L2 isometrically with ∥z∥22=∑k∣z^(k)∣2.

[F3]

Periodic Leray and pressure maps: P is self-adjoint, is a projection, and commutes with derivatives.

[F4]

Periodic Fourier embeddings and products: Hs controls C1 when s>1+d/2, and periodic Fourier truncations converge in the stated Sobolev norms.

Proof

Given: The fixed [0,T], Countable Choice, and either of the two pairs of smooth solutions in the Statement.

1.1givenF3algebra

In case (i), subtract equations and set w=u−v to get wt+P(u⋅∇w+w⋅∇v)=νΔw. Pair with w; [F3] and Pw=w remove P, periodic integration and div⁡u=0 give ∫(u⋅∇w)⋅w=0, and diffusion contributes −ν∥∇w∥22. Thus (∥w∥22)′≤2∥∇v∥∞∥w∥22.

1.2givenalgebra

In case (ii), linearity of Aj gives wt+∑jAj(q)∂jw=−∑jAj(w)∂jr, where w=q−r. Symmetry implies ∫wTAj(q)∂jw=−12∫wT(∂jAj(q))w. The fixed linear maps Aj are bounded in finite dimension, so pairing the equation with w yields (∥w∥22)′≤C(∥∇q∥∞+∥∇r∥∞)∥w∥22.

2.1givenF1F2F4step 1.1step 1.2algebra∎

In either case, multiplying the differential inequality by its integrating factor proves the corresponding L2 estimate, with a finite uniform rate Γ because the stated derivatives are continuous on the compact cylinder. For s>1, weighted coefficient H"older gives ∑kwk2(s−1)∣w^(k)∣2≤(∑k∣w^(k)∣2)1/s(∑kwk2s∣w^(k)∣2)(s−1)/s. Taking square roots and using ∥w(t)∥Hs≤2M proves the Hs−1 estimate with factor (2M)(s−1)/s; if M=0, both fields vanish in Hs and the same estimate holds. When s=1, Hs−1=H0=L2 by [F2], and the squared L2 estimate gives the stated bound with B1(M)=1, including M=0. No solution is constructed by this comparison.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources