Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-11-04 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Canonical section-ring lifting on K3 surfaces and Fano ladders

Statement

For a proper complex variety Z and line bundle M, write R(Z,M)=⊕n≥0H0(Z,Mn), with multiplication induced by tensor product. Say M is normally generated when every multiplication SymⁿH⁰(Z,M)→H⁰(Z,Mⁿ) is onto. The conclusion below asserts normal generation in this precise sense.

(K3) Let S be a smooth integral projective complex surface with KS≅OS and H1(S,OS)=0. Let L be an ample line bundle and C∈|L| a smooth integral curve. Assume the complete canonical morphism of C is a closed immersion, so the separate Max Noether construction supplies that R(C,KC) is generated by degree one. Then H1(S,Ln)=0 for every n≥0, L is normally generated, and L is very ample. No very-ampleness of L is needed as a hypothesis for this implication.

(Ambient lift) Let Y be a smooth integral projective complex variety with H1(Y,OY)=0. Let A be ample, and suppose a smooth integral member S∈|A| has normally generated restriction L=A∣S and H1(S,Ln)=0 for all n≥0. Then H1(Y,An)=0 for all n≥0, A is normally generated, and A is very ample. In particular this applies to a threefold with smooth anticanonical K3 member and A=−KY, provided the stated H1(Y,OY)=0 is supplied, and can be repeated for a smooth index-two Fano fourfold with an actual smooth member Y∈|A|. The ambient H¹ hypothesis is explicit in this general algebraic interface. In a smooth ample ladder of dimensions at least three above the stated K3 it follows from the relative-handle and compact-Kähler Hodge suppliers, as proved below; the word Fano is not used as an implicit invocation of Kodaira vanishing.

Facts & Assumptions

[A1]

Assume the Axiom of Choice as the ambient convention of the named geometric and cohomological suppliers. No classification, Kodaira vanishing, or canonical-embedding criterion is inferred from terminology. In particular the general ambient H1(O)=0 hypotheses remain explicit; the smooth ample ladder case is discharged by the named relative-handle and Hodge suppliers.

[F1]

The exact suppliers are Canonical curve section-ring generation by inner projection, Serre duality for locally free sheaves on a smooth projective variety, Serre duality for line bundles on a smooth proper curve, and the residue realization, Adjunction formula for effective divisors on a smooth projective surface, High powers of an ample line bundle embed a proper scheme, Ample divisor relative handles and primitive integral restriction, Compact Kähler Hodge decomposition from elliptic harmonic forms, The Axiom of Choice. The first supplies all canonical multiplication maps under the exact complete-canonical-embedding hypothesis. Surface and curve Serre duality supply the vanishing calculation; the surface adjunction supplier gives the numerical genus equality, while the local conormal determinant in step 4.1 identifies L|C with KC; a sufficiently high ample power supplies the final embedding. The ambient divisor restriction sequences and their exact section-ring quotients are constructed in the proof.

Proof

Given: Exactly the Statement objects, hypotheses and conventions.

1.1givenA1F1algebra

Let Z be integral proper with H0(OZ)=C, let M be a line bundle, and let the nonzero section s∈H⁰(Z,M) have an effective Cartier zero divisor W with H0(W,OW)=C. Suppose H1(Z,Mn−1)=0 for every n≥1. Multiplication by s and restriction give exact sequences 0→H0(Z,Mn−1) --s→ H⁰(Z,Mⁿ) → H⁰(W,(M|W)ⁿ)→0.

2.1givenA1F1step 1.1algebra

The left injection follows because s is a nonzerodivisor. In degree zero restriction is the isomorphism C→C by the additional H0(W,OW)=C hypothesis; in every positive degree it is onto by step 1.1. Thus the restriction of graded rings is onto, its kernel is the ideal generated by the single degree-one element s, and R(Z,M)/(s)≅R(W,M|W).

3.1givenA1F1step 2.1algebra

If the latter ring is generated in degree one, lift its degree-one generators to H⁰(Z,M). For a homogeneous u of degree n, its restriction is a linear combination of products of n degree-one restricted sections. Subtract the same linear combination of products of their chosen lifts. The remainder is s v with v of degree n−1. Starting with n=0, induction writes v, and hence u, as a polynomial in degree-one sections. Therefore M is normally generated. This argument proves the actual symmetric-power multiplication assertion, not merely finite generation in unspecified degrees.

4.1givenA1F1step 3.1algebra

Put g=g(C). For the actual smooth Cartier divisor C in S, a local defining equation f gives the conormal sequence 0→L−1∣C→ΩS1∣C→ΩC1→0, with first map f mod f²↦df. Smoothness of both C and S makes df nonzero in the normal direction, so this sequence is locally an injection of a rank-one summand with locally free quotient. If fi=uij fj, then dfi=uij dfj on C; these are precisely the transitions of L⁻¹|C. Taking determinants therefore gives KS∣C=(L−1∣C)⊗KC, hence KC=(KS⊗L)∣C=L∣C. The named numerical adjunction supplier gives 2g−2=L2>0, so g≥2. On S, Serre duality gives H2(S,L)=H0(S,L−1)∗=0: a nonzero section of the inverse ample line bundle would have an effective zero divisor of negative L degree, impossible; a nowhere-zero section would trivialize L, also impossible since L2>0. Also H2(S,OS)=C because KS=OS and S is integral proper.

5.1givenA1F1step 4.1algebra

For 0→OS→L→KC→0, the cohomology sequence includes 0=H1(OS)→H1(L)→H1(KC)→H2(OS)→H2(L)=0.

6.1givenA1F1step 5.1algebra

Curve Serre duality gives H1(KC)=H0(OC)∗=C. The displayed map between these one-dimensional spaces is onto, hence an isomorphism. Consequently H1(L)=0. This is the n=1 step that must not be omitted from an inductive vanishing argument.

7.1givenA1F1step 6.1algebra

For n≥2, the exact sequence 0→Ln−1→Ln→KCn→0 and curve Serre duality give H1(C,KCn)=H0(C,KC1−n)∗=0, since that line bundle has negative degree. Inductively H1(S,Ln−1)=0, and the long exact sequence then forces H1(S,Ln)=0. The case n=0 is the K3 hypothesis. Thus every restriction in Section 1 is onto, including n=1.

8.1givenA1F1step 7.1algebra

The separately proved Max Noether output says R(C,KC) is generated by H0(KC). Since C is smooth integral proper over C, H0(C,OC)=C. Apply Section 1 to S,L,C: the full K3 section ring is generated by H⁰(S,L). This establishes all multiplication maps in every degree, not just the quadratic multiplication map.

9.1givenA1F1step 8.1algebra

For the ambient data, tensor the divisor sequence by Aⁿ to obtain 0→An−1→An→Ln→0.

10.1givenA1F1step 9.1algebra

The base H1(Y,OY)=0 and H1(S,Ln)=0 imply inductively H1(Y,An)=0: the relevant segment is H1(Y,An−1)→H1(Y,An)→H1(S,Ln). Both outside groups vanish. Since S is smooth integral projective over C, H0(S,OS)=C. Section 1 then applies at every degree and lifts normal generation from L to A.

11.1givenA1F1step 10.1algebra

The same local equation and conormal determinant argument in any smooth ambient Z gives KD=(KZ⊗OZ(D))∣D for each actual smooth Cartier divisor D. Thus for the smooth threefold with Sin∣−KY∣ one obtains KS=OS, but H1(S,OS)=0 is a further K3 input, not a consequence of this line-bundle identity alone. For the smooth fourfold V with −KV=2A and actual smooth Y∈|A| it gives KY=(KV⊗A)∣Y=−A∣Y, equivalently −KY=A∣Y. If the explicit H¹(O) hypotheses hold at each level, the preceding algebra applies twice. No new cohomological vanishing theorem enters at the second lift.

12.1givenA1F1step 11.1algebra

For an actual smooth ample divisor S in Y with dim Y≥3, Ample divisor relative handles and primitive integral restriction gives H₁(S,Z)≅H₁(Y,Z). By Compact Kähler Hodge decomposition from elliptic harmonic forms, H1(S,OS)=0 implies H1(S,C)=0, because H¹ splits into the conjugate (1,0) and (0,1) parts. The homology isomorphism gives H1(Y,C)=0 and hence H1(Y,OY)=0. Repeat the same argument for any next smooth ample ambient inclusion of dimension at least three. Thus the needed ambient vanishing is actually supplied throughout the smooth K3/Fano ladder, without Kodaira vanishing or simple-connectivity assumptions.

13.1givenA1F1step 12.1algebra

Let M be any ample line bundle on a projective variety and suppose all its section-ring multiplications are onto. Choose N>0 with Mᴺ very ample. At a point where every degree-one section vanished, every product of N such sections would vanish; surjectivity would make all sections of Mᴺ vanish, contradicting its global generation. Therefore M is globally generated and defines a morphism φM.

14.1givenA1F1step 13.1algebra∎

The degree-N multiplication surjection identifies the complete Mᴺ linear system with the restrictions to φM(Z) of all degree-N homogeneous polynomials in its degree-one coordinates, modulo those vanishing identically. Consequently the morphism given by Mᴺ is the restriction of the Nth Veronese of φM to its linear span. Since Mᴺ gives a closed immersion and the Veronese is a closed immersion, φM is itself a closed immersion: identifying the Veronese image with its source identifies φM(Z), with its closed subscheme structure, with the Mᴺ image. Thus M is very ample.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources