Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-11-04 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

First Chern class of a complex bundle equals that of its determinant

Statement

Assume AC. If E→B is a numerable complex vector bundle of positive finite rank over a path-connected paracompact Hausdorff CGWH space B of CW homotopy type, then c1(E)=c1(det⁡CE) in H2(B;Z), where det⁡CE=Λrank⁡CEE.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC and a numerable complex vector bundle E→B of rank n≥1 on the stated base.

[A1]

Full AC is the choice-function principle of The Axiom of Choice; it is inherited by the projective-bundle and Chern-class suppliers below.

[F1]

For a numerable complex bundle on a path-connected paracompact Hausdorff CW complex, the flag pullback splits q∗E=L1⊕⋯⊕Ln and q∗ is injective on integral cohomology (Complex splitting principle with integral injective pullback).

[F2]

Pulling a numerable bundle back along a continuous map preserves numerability. For a bundle over a CW model, its flag bundle is an iterated projective bundle with compact CW fibers CPr; the general compact-fiber statement makes every stage paracompact Hausdorff CGWH of CW type. A homotopy equivalence induces an isomorphism on singular cohomology (Complex flag bundle and Chern roots, Compact-fibre bundle totals preserve paracompactness, and CW type under CW-type hypotheses, Homotopic maps induce equal maps in singular cohomology).

[F3]

The projective-bundle definition gives a unique monic relation for each numerable complex bundle over a path-connected paracompact Hausdorff CGWH base of CW type. For a pullback, the projective charts identify P(f∗V) with the base-change B′×BP(V) and identify its tautological line with the pulled-back line. The Thom definition of its Euler class and naturality of Thom classes then pull back the tautological class and the defining relation; coefficient uniqueness gives Chern-class naturality on these bases. On a CW base the total Chern class is multiplicative under Whitney sums (Chern classes from the projective-bundle relation, Naturality, normalization, and Whitney sum for Chern classes).

[F4]

On a line bundle, the first Chern class is its coefficient in the projective-bundle relation (Chern classes from the projective-bundle relation).

[F5]

First Chern class is additive under line-bundle tensor product: c1(L⊗M)=c1(L)+c1(M) (First Chern class of tensor, dual, and conjugate lines).

Proof

technique · splitting principle
1.1F3constructalgebra

We record the pullback naturality used in this proof, including the case of a CW-type target. Let b:B′→B be continuous between path-connected paracompact Hausdorff CGWH bases of CW type, and let V→B be numerable of positive rank. In projective charts, P(b∗V) is B′×BP(V); the induced map b~:P(b∗V)→P(V) pulls the tautological line of V back to that of b∗V. Its oriented Euler class x is therefore natural under b~. Pull back the defining monic relation for V along b~. The result is a monic relation for xb∗V with coefficients b∗ci(V); uniqueness in the projective-bundle theorem on B′ gives ci(b∗V)=b∗ci(V).

1.2A1F1given

Choose a path-connected CW complex K and a homotopy equivalence f:K→B, and put EK=f∗E. The pulled-back numeration makes EK a numerable complex bundle over the CW base K. Apply [F1] to its flag bundle q:F=Fl⁡(EK)→K. It gives a splitting q∗EK=⨁j=1nLj and injectivity of q∗:H2(K;Z)→H2(F;Z).

2.1F2step 1.2

Each projective stage in the flag tower has fiber CPr, a compact finite CW complex. The general compact-fiber conclusion in [F2] makes F paracompact Hausdorff CGWH of CW type. The flag fiber U(n)/Tn is connected and K is path connected, so F is path connected. Choose a path-connected CW model h:W→F that is a homotopy equivalence.

3.1F2F3F5step 1.2step 2.1

Let V=q∗EK. By step 1.1, naturality on CW-type bases gives h∗c1(V)=c1(h∗V) and h∗c1(det⁡CV)=c1(h∗det⁡CV). On the CW base W, the splitting in step 1.2, Whitney multiplicativity, and line-bundle tensor additivity yield c1(h∗V)=∑j=1nc1(h∗Lj)=c1 ⁣(⨂j=1nh∗Lj)=c1(h∗det⁡CV). Here h∗det⁡CV≅det⁡C(h∗V)≅⨂jh∗Lj. Since h∗ is an isomorphism by [F2], this proves c1(V)=c1(det⁡CV) on F. The injectivity of q∗ from step 1.2 then gives c1(EK)=c1(det⁡CEK) on K.

4.1F2F3step 3.1∎

Apply step 1.1 to f:K→B: c1(EK)=f∗c1(E), and exterior powers commute with pullback, so c1(det⁡CEK)=f∗c1(det⁡CE). The map f∗ is an isomorphism by homotopy invariance [F2]. The equality on K from step 3.1 therefore implies c1(E)=c1(det⁡CE) on B.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources